User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 32

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

Franco Iacomella article

Hi, thanks for your message. Im new in Wikipedia. I added that article because its about an important free software referent and GNU hacker of latin america and because other important figures of the free software foundation as Fernanda G. Weiden, Federico Heinz or Christiano Anderson have acepted articles. Why this case is different? Thanks for your help.

--Maximus99 (talk) 07:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

James Brown (scout)

You obviously do not releaise how significant this fellow is in the world of illeagal abseiling. More information will be included as i go along with this, you can not just delte it in a second. You should find more out about this guy he is one of the most reputable memebers of the young abseilers of australia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sometung (talk • contribs) 11:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Sometung (talk) 12:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Dude Where are youuuuuuuuuuuuuu. Stop deleting my stuff and look at this Sometung (talk) 12:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Bit confused about what I can post

I have just tried to post a page on Pen Heaven which is a great company I have bought from in the past and not found on Wiki. I thought it would be a great way of my adding to Wiki. I found Parker and Lamy so thought it was fine to create a page on a company. It has been speedily deleted but I can't understand why Parker can stay but Pen Heaven can't? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by EmmaPJs (talk • contribs) 11:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

• You need to show that Pen Heaven is notable per WP:CORP, by citing reliable sources per WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of crooker (again)

Ya'll really need to stop deleting the crooker page. They are legitimate and if wikipedia can't understand that, you're way too narrowminded! Bring it back! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thorton wilder (talk • contribs)

20:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

FKorning deleted (A7)

are there any restrictions on User: Pages?

Wetpaint is a veribiable source. The crooker needs to be on wikipedia. What more would you like us to put on it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Durkola 6 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

You deleted the article about 'Jigni' because it doesn't emphasize the importance of it? the article clearly stated that the website is unique in its concept and is clearly not 'pure advertising' Grnavigator (talk) 13:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

• It's not enough for you to give your opinion that a website is unique or important. It needs to be recognized as such by reliable independent sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Ƿynnþorneð is salted???

User:Ƿynnþorneð made an edit to Verner's Law today and I would like to talk to him about it. Imagine my surprise when I found that his talk page was protected. Oddly enough his user page isn't. This looks like such an un-random salting that I figured I'd come to you and ask what's up rather than do something abnormal like post on his user page instead. Is there a reason why this person's talk page has been protected against creation? By the way his username is "wynn thorn eth" in Old English, which are three letters of the alphabet. It actually curiously resembles "wtf" but I am assuming that is a coincidence. Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 22:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Evansville Lincoln High School Article Deleted

I looked up this high school. It says the article was deleted because "This was a high school that consolidated into another high school". Are you kidding? First of all, so what? It's still worthwhile knowing about high schools that consolidated. More significantly, in this case, Lincoln was not "consolidated". It was an all-black K-12 school established in order to keep black students out of schools in Southwestern Indiana. Other counties bussed their black students in. The schol became an elementary school in the '60's due to the Supreme Court mandate. These things are worth noting. It wasn't just a school that was around for a while before closing due to enrollment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.68.176.153 (talk) 22:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

• Not quite. The article was deleted for being too short, because its entire content was one sentence: "Evansville Lincoln was a high school that ended up being consolidated into another high school.'" This does not prevent anyone from recreating the article with information such as you've provided above, as long as it's backed by reliable independent sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Email

You got a serious email I need you to read. Thanks Secret ^account 02:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

• Responded by email. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • • I responded back, I need the info. Secret ^account 20:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I would like to write an article about AsiaPay but is speedy deleted. As there is many article about online payment gateway, may AsiaPay also included in Wiki? May you please kindly advice how I can write to meet the Wiki standard?

Here is the article being deleted. "AsiaPay Limited is an online payment service provider, strives to electronic payment processing solutions and services to banks, corporate, SMEs, charities and others in Asia market for credit card, debit card and other prepaid card payments. AsiaPay serves as accredited TPP processor and payment gateway solution vendor for banks, certified IPSP for merchants, certified international 3D-Secure vendor for Visa, MasterCard and JCB. Headquartered in Hong Kong, AsiaPay operates 5 other offices across Asia including Thailand, Philippines, Singapore, Macau and China."

Thank you, Bowie —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bowielkk (talk • contribs) 03:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

• You're going to need to find reliable independent sources which show that this company meets the notability standards of WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

We are listed as the vendor of visa and master, ie. http://www.visa-asia.com/ap/hk/en_US/cardholders/offers/vbv_index.shtml, http://www.mastercard.com/us/merchant/solutions/securecode_vendor_list.html We are shown in some news, i.e. TDC: http://ict.hktdc.com/suc-e263.htm Are those sources good enough? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bowielkk (talk • contribs) 04:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

• Nope. A lot of nonnotable companies have big corporations as clients, and the last source you listed is a PR press release. Please read WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Visa and master is not AsiaPay's client, while AsiaPay is the authorized vendor of 3D-secure in industry. Besides, AsiaPay is in the Registry PCI DSS Service Provider list (http://www.visa-asia.com/ap/sea/merchants/riskmgmt/vrsp_list.html). That's what I write in the article, isn't it?

Josueaguilera10

I think you might have missed putting this where you wanted. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for unprotecting your talk page and giving us anonoymous and new users a chance to get in touch with one of the most active admins on any wiki project there is. By protecting you were only punishing us innocent users and doing such a thing only serves to make the sheep laugh harder and longer. I thank you for the work you have done in combating the vandalism on the wiki and hope that you will not take such a stance in regard to your page again. There are a number of things you can do apart from doing the easy thing and pressing that protect tab which serves no purpose. You could ask East718 and his bot to look after your page, you could create a subpage like so many users have done or you could also just get over the rubbish and improve the encyclopedia. Is that not what we're all here for? I hope you take the above comments in mind. It is in your hands. You still have my respect. Cheers 211.30.110.181 (talk) 12:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy fingers, speedy eyes?

Did you even read the note on Talk:Allison Stokke, or did you just blindly delete it in your recent spree? Mahalo. --Ali'i 16:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

• I read it. Given the two AFD deletions, you probably need to use Wikipedia:Deletion review rather than the talk page of the deleted article. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Don't tell me that... tell those other people who had commented. --Ali'i 16:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Block

Thank you for blocking User:Restlessskies232. The comments this user left were quite racist and sexist! Bearian (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Pickbothmanlol

Thanks. I was just filling out another SPI report on him. Wronkiew (talk) 17:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

P.O.O.P.

Gee, I hope I get past RC patrol with that section header. :)
I was just about to decline the G1 tag on the P.O.O.P article, for two reasons: It wasn't "patent nonsense" per the definition, and it wasn't vandalism either per google (See this search, seems to be a well known concept from the show). From what I can see, the author created this in good fait. Although it is clearly not something we want to keep as an article it's not covered by any of the SD criteria. --Amalthea 22:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

• Recreated as a redirect to SpongeBob SquarePants -- that work for you? Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 22:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  • It does, thanks. If I were you I'd probably restore the deleted revisions (possibly including the two oldest ones, which were about the same thing) so that you won't be bugged should the redirect be deleted at some point in the future. Cheers, and thanks, Amalthea 23:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Stevie "Keys" Roseman

I have found numerous references to this musician and I attempted to begin an article but unfortunately did not get very far. Can you (or anyone) help by perhaps adding even one link which I don't know how to do? Guess I will learn as I go. Thanks much! (Jets23615 (talk) 09:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC))

• Wikified and formatted. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Writing a wiki

Hello. I noticed that you deleted Writing a wiki, which I had proposed for deletion, under WP:CSD A3. At the time that I PRODed it, it had quite a bit of content, and was a recognizable guide to electronic storage methods. Was it blanked in the time between the PROD and the Deletion?--Unscented (talk) 12:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

• No, but it just wasn't very useful -- it had short descriptions of smart cards, flash drives, and compact discs, all of which have their own articles, as does the general topic Data storage device. And Writing a wiki isn't a good redirect to Data storage device. So maybe A3 wasn't right, but I don't see any reason to restore this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Taylor Perkinson

The article I wrote about Taylor Perkinson was not an attack page. All I said is that he was a same-sex activist and a autism activist. You are being prejudice and assume that he is not actually gay, or that he supports gays and autistic societies. I feel like the page was wrongly deleted and should be put back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcannon98188 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

No he really is a stinking gay rights activist. Your are such a retard. You just assume that I am being a jerk to him because I am making a wiki that says he is a gay activist. HE IS A GAY ACTIVIST. You sir are being prejudice and need to stop. People can legitimately support gay rights retard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcannon98188 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Actually, the article was deleted as an attack page because it contained negative, unsourced statements about its subject. In this case, while you may believe that being gay or autistic is an insult, in point of fact there were other claims in the article that were unsubstantiated and really were negative, unsourced content. Please see WP:BLP, and while you're at it, it may help to read this overview of what can happen to editors who continue to disrupt the project.  Frank  |  talk  21:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Taj semi-protection

As a major editor to Taj Mahal, I'm very grateful for this article's semi-protection. Before semi-protection, it was practically a full-time job cleaning up the mess left by vandalism and tests from anonymous IPs. Since semi-protection, the page is still actively edited by new editors, often to very good effect. Glad you're on the case. --nemonoman (talk) 00:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Astronomy/Importance ratings deletion

Please could you clarify why you deleted Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy/Importance ratings? We are using this for our astronomy WikiProject ratings. It is completely unclear why G3 is applicable. Sorry my mistake; I thought the page had been deleted, when it was actually the talk page. It's been a long day...—RJH (talk) 00:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

RE: Great War of Kranzania

Ok. Sorry, it was an experiment. I should have done it in the sandbox, right?

Also, I don't know if 'patent nonsense' was the right word for it. --Emissome (talk) 00:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Removal of Pillow Talks

I'm very confused as to why you deleted the page about Pillow Talks. It's a legitimate web series, the article cited references from multiple legitimate news sources, such as tubefilter.tv and reelchicago.com, and I can point at several articles about similar content(web series) that display a similar level of information and references (or less), are in no way more significant, and have not been deleted. For example, The Suburbs (web series), Spy Grid, Cockpit (web series), to name a few. Not trying to point fingers, but I do feel all content should be treated equally. Please advise. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoenix200fr (talk • contribs) 06:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

_____________________________________

South West Phoenix deletion

HI!!!

You deleted South West Phoenix page they play in a football league with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashfield_SC and others... how can one team be relevant but another from exactly the same competion not?

CHeers Owneroperator (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC).

User:Hamish Ross sockpuppets

I've looked at the user creation logs from 28-30 November 2007 and found a few accounts that either look like sockpuppets of User:Hamish Ross, or are in groups of accounts with similar names, or are inappropriate names (although there are probably more that are not as obvious). I've made a list in my sandbox at [1] (there is also a new account that appears to be a meatpuppet or sockpuppet). —Snigbrook 13:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• Nice work! Blocked all but the first one (not sure about that name, but the rest definitely fit). Thanks!! NawlinWiki (talk) 13:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• • The first one is a reference to the Sudanese teddy bear blasphemy case, there is already a sockpuppet with a name referring to it (Mick Fitz"Gillian"gibbons (talk · contribs)). I'm not sure if Gillian Gibbons (talk · contribs) is a sockpuppet, but there should probably be a username block for possible impersonation, as it refers to a person in the news at the time and is unlikely to be that person. The IP probably doesn't need a long block (if any block) as it is dynamic and the user has changed IPs since (the most recent in that range is 91.108.229.98 (talk · contribs) which has been blocked), I only added it for comparison with the new account, i.e. the username and user page were references to that vandalism. —Snigbrook 14:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• • • I get it - Gillian now blocked. Thanks again! NawlinWiki (talk) 14:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• More suspected socks: [2], also Monty The Python (talk · contribs) appears to be a false positive, the edits don't look similar. —Snigbrook 16:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• Got those and more, and unblocked Monty. Well done! NawlinWiki (talk) 16:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Robert Godwin

Hi!

I responded to a post on the help desk which requested that the lede be expanded. I duly did that and considered the matter closed. However, I glanced back over the history today and spotted your protection - and the edits that preceded it. That set alarm bells ringing, and I thought I should run my changes by you.

So... have I been trolled?! In my defense I didn't blindly accept the help desk poster's wording - I read the article and edited the lede to reflect the subject's full career.

Please feel free to revert my recent changes if you deem it necessary. Out of curiosity I'd appreciate any background to this issue that you'd be prepared to provide - though I'll understand if that isn't possible.

Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 14:25, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• The edits I reverted were made by a Jarlaxle Artemis/Grawp sock, just to get to 10 edits so that he could move pages. I have no problem with you making the changes. It's interesting that for someone who hates Wikipedia so much, he cares enough to use an IP account to ask for a legitimate change. If he'd just stop moving pages, he could make all the legitimate changes he wanted to (and could maybe even get some of his beloved Dungeons & Dragons articles back). NawlinWiki (talk) 14:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• Ah, understood. I suppose it's possible that the posting on WP:Help desk was purely coincidental. Sadly I suspect it's more likely that the little giant really is that obsessive. Thanks for the explanation, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 14:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Disperse iT deletion

How can I better right this article so it isn't deleted. I was following guidelines to other similar website services that were returned in free file hosting keyword search. Therefore, I was a bit confused on why this was deleted?

Thanks, MrD3SAi —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrD3SAi (talk • contribs) 18:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Email.

You've got mail. JoshuaZ (talk) 18:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Email

And from me. Black Kite 18:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Pretty sure those are about the same thing. JoshuaZ (talk) 18:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• They are -- thanks, guys. I responded to both by email. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Page move protect of Fox

Hi, I noticed that you have indef pagemove blocked Fox since 2008-09-23. Do you think this should be removed? Please look at WP:RFUP -Zeus-^u_c 02:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion

I do not understand why my recent page bio on artist james teej has been deleted? I would like to know how to write it while staying in the lines of wikipedia. Other artists such as deadmau5 are on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecraigon (talk • contribs) 05:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Removal of Pillow Talks

Hi. You didn't respond to my previous post about the deletion of the page for Pillow Talks (web series). Could you please shed some light? I double checked these examples i gave you, and Pillow Talks was no less relevent, referenced or notable than any of these. Thanks

I'm very confused as to why you deleted the page about Pillow Talks. It's a legitimate web series, the article cited references from multiple legitimate news sources, such as tubefilter.tv and reelchicago.com, and I can point at several articles about similar content(web series) that display a similar level of information and references (or less), are in no way more significant, and have not been deleted. For example, The Suburbs (web series), Spy Grid, Cockpit (web series), to name a few. Not trying to point fingers, but I do feel all content should be treated equally. Please advise. Thank you. Phoenix200fr (talk) 21:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• Can you show that tubefilter.tv and reelchicago.com are reliable sources (see WP:V) and not just blogs/PR outlets? As for the other articles, see generally WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS -- but The Suburbs has a regular newspaper article and Cockpit has a CNET article. I've deleted Spy Grid for lacking any sources, and not even being in production yet. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• What do I need to do to show that tubefilter.tv and reelchicago are real? tubefilter.tv and tilzy.tv are two out 3 or 4 websites that independently review internet video content exclusively. They cohost the Streamy awards. And reelchicago is a local Chicago film dedicated newsletter that has existed for as long as I can remember, and is accepted as reference in other wikipedia articles (Flashpoint The Academy of Media Arts and Sciences).

In addition, Pillow Talks was also reviewed on (tilzy.tv, which I hadn't included as a reference as I thought tubefilter and reelchicago would suffice, but can be added as a reference. Let me know if that is enough. Thanks.Phoenix200fr (talk) 07:27, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

• • Fair enough -- I've restored the article. Please add the third source. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 15:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

• • • Done. Thank you. Phoenix200fr (talk) 22:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Abusive new accounts

They're both RMHED (talk · contribs). And now Angeredstory (talk · contribs) just moments ago... Although his range is high-traffic, I've now blocked it to prevent further account creation. He's made a few dozen socks today alone. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 17:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedies in userspace

There is some pretty strong disagreement floating around about when to speedy spam in userspace. Relevant recent discussions are at WT:UP and Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Bcs2011/Purple_States,_LLC, and see my link there for my argument. I really don't care how it turns out, I 'd just prefer that speedy taggers don't feel burned by some admins calling it one way and some calling it another. (Watchlisting) - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 17:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello

I would like to nominate you for bureaucratship because of your good work. Would you accept? LetsdrinkTea 01:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks! Let me think about it a bit, and I'll respond soon. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Alright, give it some good thought. I know that you would make an excellent 'crat if you do accept. LetsdrinkTea

So have you given any thought as to whether or not you would like to become a bureaucrat? LetsdrinkTea 19:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Good work!

Quick work on the vandals of Building society, and blocking the offensive account. Nice one. Fences and windows (talk) 11:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

More vandalism from anon IP

65.5.177.230, whom you blocked recently, is at it again on Jeff Francoeur with identical vandalism edits. Just thought you might like to consider blocking them again. Thanks. Atlantabravz (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Questions regarding the ability to view deleted articles

Hey I asked several other admins before none of which were sure what the procedure was excatly. Can I gain the ability to view deleted pages? Is this right reserved for administrators only or is there some form of special privilege that can be applied for without becoming an admin? Valoem ^talk 16:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

A potential article in response to a red link

I have started to write a potential article, currently a subpage of my user page, following an incorrectly titled red link (detailed on my user page) that I would be very grateful for your input and advice prior to submitting and categorizing.Hudson702 (talk) 17:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

OK - many thanks for having a look! Hudson702 (talk) 19:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Please refrain from interfearing with my work on Frank Turner. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FrankFakeTurner (talk • contribs) 18:55, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Select Registry

You recently (and correctly) deleted Select Registry as spam. I have now rewritten this article to satisfy the notability and neutrality standards. Since you were one of the deleting administrators, could you please restore the revisions of the article for GFDL/history attribution? If you restore the article, I will immediately copy and paste the contents of my offline sandbox into this article. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 18:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

I've rewritten the article. Thanks for restoring it! Cunard (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Titleblacklist blocking legitimate pagemoves

See WP:AN#Legitimate pagemove being blocked by title blacklist and subsequent discussions. 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{(Dinoguy1000)} 20:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

The offending regex is

.*[НΉĤĦȞʰʱḢḤḦḨḪНҢӇӉΗἨἩἪἫἬἭἮἯῊЋΗᾘ\+-−ŧſⱧԋњһłƗ!].{4,49}[RŔŖŘȐȒƦʳʴʵʶṘṚṜṞЯ®ΡΡ₧ÞþΡρРрƤṔṖǷґЃΓم].*

Until you figure out why it matches the majority of article titles, I recommend not editing the blacklist. It's a fairly subtle error, but you should be able to figure it out. --Carnildo (talk) 23:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Moving a user subpage to main Wikipedia space

Just to check - I assume that if I have drafted an article as a user subpage and I now want to move it to the main Wikipedia space, I just rename it by deleting the 'user:Hudson7802/' before the page name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hudson702 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Protecting Katie White?

Hi For information I've just rewritten Katie White after looking with interest at the history of previous versions where you have had to protect the article from vandalism which all ended up with a redirect to The Ting Tings. Hope it will be OK now Thruxton (talk) 19:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Defender of the Wiki!

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar for always being one step ahead and defending Wikipedia from the many, many, many ways it is attacked through vandalism, etc. Everytime I go to fix something, I get there and you've taken care of it already. Well done! DreamHaze (talk) 02:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi NawlinWiki, thanks for getting that editor off my back. He has been using multiple user names and IP addresses to try and mess up Wikipedia, and annoy me in the process. Thanks again and keep up the good work. Regards, WWGB (talk) 03:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Adam.J.W.C. has pointed that two others could be sock puppets at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon L Bailey. Bidgee (talk) 03:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

UPDATE: Please see this threat that I just received. Regards, WWGB (talk) 04:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

The work of deleting IP vandalism on chem element pages

Since you're involved, I wonder if you'd like to comment on this discussion on semi-protection for element articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elements Thanks! SBHarris 00:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

speedy deletion of Shannon Braithwaite

I don't understand why my page was deleted. It was on a real event and I had outside reliable sources to prove that. I don't agree that a young girl that was murdered by another teen relative is not notable. Can you please tell me what I can add to my page to make it meet the wikipedia criteria? I did a good search on the Murdered American Children page and I found a couple of pages that seem to be less notable than my page on Shannon: Kayla Rowland, Ronnie Paris, Dalia Harir, and Joseph Wallace. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qualynda (talk • contribs) 15:51, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

• Unfortunately, there are thousands of murders every year. Most of them draw at least one local news article, which is what you have. But that doesn't mean that they are all notable per our guidelines at WP:BIO. The deaths of Kayla Rowland, Ronnie Paris, and Joseph Wallace received substantial news coverage from multiple sources. Dalia Harir's is more comparable, and I have listed that one for deletion as well. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
• My name is Alex Jones, and I'm a high school teacher in Brooklyn. Qualynda (whose account I am writing under) is a student in my technology class, and her assignment was to create a Wikipedia page.

When I read the WP:BIO page what I saw was the Basic Criteria: "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject."

   * If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.[6]
   * Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.

There are multiple news sources that Qualynda didn't cite but would be happy to if it would mean that the page could be re-established. Shannon's death was certainly big news in our community in New York City (not just limited to Brooklyn), and your message seems to imply that if Shannon's page has "substantial news coverage from multiple sources" then it can be re-established.

Please see the following "multiple, independent sources" for more information:

• New York Times on Shannon's Death
• New York Times on Shannon's Death
• WCBS' Coverage of Shannon's Murder
• Gothamist (Online Magazine) Coverage
• New York Post's Coverage of Shannon's Murder
• NY1's Coverage of Shannon's Murder (Local Cable News Station

Qualynda (talk) 17:06, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Dang you're fast!

You speedy-deleted (db-attack) the article Ben Young while I was posting the db-attack notice on it, even though I was using Twinkle. Great work! --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

C. Rufus Pennington III

I'm far from certain that the author intended this to be deleted; I think they just moved it to their user space to work on, perhaps not realizing that they were deleting the original. It survived an AFD some time ago, so I'm not sure the author blanking it would even qualify it for speedy deletion. Brianyoumans (talk) 20:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

• No, the author actually tagged it g7. He is perfectly free to move it back if he wants (though a lot of these Guantanamo-lawyer articles are at AFD now). NawlinWiki (talk) 21:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for helping me clean up my userspace there... it was getting to be a bit of a mess. –Drilnoth (T • C) 23:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

How do I make a comment without editing? I need help!Charfair (talk) 17:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Ministry for State Security (East Germany) → Stasi

Hi, NawlinWiki. Can you remove Ministry for State Security (East Germany) to Stasi back? Stasi was removed by Gryffindor [3] in January 2009. But I doubt that there was consensus about the title, because existing the practice of commonly known titles, like Dr. Strangelove not Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, United States not United States of America, Uzi not Uzi submachine gun, etc. Solve this problem, please, if not difficult. — Al3xil ✉ 05:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

whats your problem? at least let me have a chance to argue before you delete something AND the talk page that i could do it on? come on man, that's weak. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petwar83 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Fruitynut?

Is there a checkuser for this? I was persuaded to give him the benefit of the doubt. --Rodhullandemu 00:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• No, User:RMHED has been doing the same thing for about a week now -- using the same specific obscenity to try to get Jimbo to semiprotect all BLP articles. He started by creating multiple offensive article titles, and is now just going after Jimbo's talk page. User:Nishkid64 ran a checkuser on some of the earlier ones, but the pattern is very clear. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

K, thanks, now I know it's him I won't be so lenient. --Rodhullandemu 00:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Normal Form

Hey bud I was still working on the page and you deleted it half way through my creation of it. Shouldn't you at less wait or mark as private until verified or something. Completely deleting something someone was working on for 2 hours is pretty rude. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianbu01 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Usernames

Yeah, locking-and-hiding them on Meta once he's unified them, which prevents them from ever being used again. I should have done that before renaming them all, of course. Ah well, lesson learned. — Dan | talk 04:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

The Fureys Article Deletion review

Just reviewed this you speedy deleted a while back and its now a proper article and a good source for information - I just wanted you to review your process for speedy deleting to ensure that articles have a chance to grow before being deleted as not notable 24-48 hours should be allowed before deleting anything that isn't obvoious junk. IMHO The_Fureys --Davelane (talk) 11:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Inappropriate user name

Are you aware of a user NawlinWikī ejaculates in children's mouths? His user name has not yet been deleted, but thought you might find it interesting. Also, thanks for the help on the Madoff Investment Scandal AfD bizarrity. Newguy34 (talk) 19:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

GFDL violation in creation of Madoff Investment Scandal

You did a speedy keep on Madoff Investment Scandal before I could comment at the AfD for it. I believe it was a GFDL violation exactly as stated by the user who nominated it for deletion. Newguy34 split the article Bernard Madoff as explained on the talk page for that article. When he created the new article Madoff Investment Scandal, he didn't put that it was a split from another article in the edit summary as he was supposed to based on Wikipedia:Splitting. This means the history of who wrote the text isn't kept at Madoff Investment Scandal, which is a violation of part 4 of the GFDL exactly as Nondk said. I'm not sure what the proper way to fix that is (I don't think deletion is correct), but it does need to be fixed somehow. Calathan (talk) 19:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Can an admin like NawlinWiki perhaps edit the edit summary of the first entry? -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count) • I'm watching this page so just reply to me right here!} 19:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Oops, good grief, user Calathan is right. My oversight. How can we fix? Newguy34 (talk) 19:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I just looked up how to go about fixing this. Apparently there is a special speedy delete tag for this, and then an admin needs to temorarily delete it and recreate it with the history added in. I have tagged the article with what I think is the correct tag. I'm not 100% sure I got the right tag since this is a split and not a move, so if anyone knows another tag that should have been used, please replace the tag I used. Calathan (talk) 19:55, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

You all are right about the GFDL history issue, but this is going to require more than a quick fix and I'm not going to do anything until I figure out how to do it (or, better, if someone who's familiar with this does it first). NawlinWiki (talk) 20:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

A quick fix suffices, I think; one need only to make a null edit with an edit summary to the effect that the article incorporates content from Bernard Madoff, which edit need not precede the first (in essence, the procedure we follow whenever we split an article; that the entry is anachronistic is not a GFDL problem). Joe 23:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

And, having read the discussion at Talk:Madoff investment scandal, I made the establishing edit; we need, it is my sense, go no further. Joe 23:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For all your hard work at WP:AIV, it's really appreiciated that you deal with it so quickly :D cf38talk 20:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Song cloth

E-mail. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 21:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Book

This article appears to be have been semi-protected by you since 11 July 2008. Is this intentional? Seems a very long time for such a fundamental article. Exxolon (talk) 23:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

• All I did was add a moveprotect to the existing semiprotection, which was added by User:Hemlock Martinis. You might want to check with him. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Odd - that doesn't come up in the warning box when I click edit - I get "19:49, 11 July 2008 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) changed protection level for "Book" ‎ (no reason to move this page w/o discussion [edit=autoconfirmed:move=sysop]) (hist)" - is this a bug or a software limitation I'm unaware of? I will post on User:Hemlock Martinis talk regardless but will prob also put on WP:AN - their editing has been sporadic this month with nothing since 6th. Exxolon (talk) 00:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Happy NawlinWiki/Archive 32's Day!

User:NawlinWiki/Archive 32 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as NawlinWiki/Archive 32's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear NawlinWiki/Archive 32! Peace, Rlevse ~ A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:21, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

why did you delete tripmaster monkey?

Tripmaster Monkey was an important and influential band that easily meets the WP notoriety standards as defined by Wikipedia. I feel they deserve their own Wikipedia page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trivialgenius (talk • contribs) 23:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

• Sorry, somehow missed the albums on Warner/Sire (verified on Amazon). I've restored the page. But you need to find some sources, though, or the article may get deleted anyway. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Majestic MC

Hi there, my apologies, would you mind un-blocking the page so i can edit accordingly. The site the information claims to be copied from was actually form his MySpace/FaceBook as well - i thought it was therefore "copy-able"

I'll re-write using my own wording =)

I assume i can keep the discography info?

Thanks for the notice, sorry for the delay

Speak soon! —Preceding unsigned comment added by G33k84 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for just now!

I appreciate you doing something about that antisocial individual just now. Very kind of you to take notice and act. - Vianello (talk) 01:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Wombstretcha

Thanks for telling me the reason, I was not aware of that policy for speedy deletion, I'll keep it in mind in the future. I was sort of saving as I went along assuming I'd find some articles which worded his notability better than I could. I'm still looking, so once I've got more sources and know how to word it I'll restore it. This should improve the quality of the article in the long run. Tyciol (talk) 02:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Grawp and The Log from the Sea of Cortez

You didn't sprotect this long enough, and the IP attacks have continued. Not so obviously GRAWP, but (from the content) surely him, anyway. This article was hardly touched until GRAWP noticed it. Would you mind sprotecting it for longer, and perma-blocking some of these IPs? I don't care if they are copycats or zombies, they need to be gone anyway. SBHarris 20:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Thegryseone

Hi, I don't usually second-guess administrator actions and I'm sure you have a lot of busy work to do but I noticed that your block of User:Thegryseone was indefinite. Because Thegryseone has been a constructive contributor of Wikipedia's language-related articles and because the gap between his problematic behavior, the repeated warnings, and the block were so short (less than 20 minutes total), I ask that you change his block time from indefinite to something more reasonable. Thank you. — Ƶ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]} 05:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

FYI, this has been raised here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Thegryseone. Suggest you clarify your decision and/or consider revising it and giving the user another chance. Rd232 ^talk 05:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Back again

I hate to bother you with this again, but now that the block you gave to 65.5.177.230 has expired, he is at it again on Jeff Francoeur with identical vandalism edits. Just thought you might like to consider blocking them once again. Thanks. Atlantabravz (talk) 16:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, it didn't take him long after you warned him: Another vandalism edit Atlantabravz (talk) 22:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Vision (Band)

Why do you constantly delete my shit off wikipedia? i am getting really pissed cause you keep deleting my pages. how would u like if u deleted your shit?

Vanlalizer warner

Is there anyway to block the socks of User:Vanlalizer warner, users Vanlalism warner and My edits will not be constructive. The first is not confirmed sock, but it is a pretty good bet....the second (My edits will not be constructive) was created by Vanlalizer warner. - NeutralHomer • Talk • March 17, 2009 @ 04:00

• Hi. Just passing by. The latter is clearly a disruptive Username and I have reported it as such. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • March 17, 2009 @ 04:04

Bhookh.com

Hey buddy, Bhookh.com is one of the first and one of the earlier CLick-to-donte websites in India. Ifact if I am correct, it happens to be the only one in India. And I am NOT including Global companies like the UN and all. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

You're a smart person. You delete the talk page saying it is the talk page of a nonexistant page, when the page STILL exists, thus effectively leaving NO space to discuss, and thus ultimately having YOUR way and the article being deleted....... You're an admin, you should atleast have a little more consideration, to leave the talk page till the article is deleted, that is...if it is deleted. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:25, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Tenrox Inc.

Hello NW. Would you be able to expand on your decision to remove the article on Tenrox? I have referred to the general notability guidelines as well as those for a business and am mystified that you feel Tenrox fails to meet them. In business for 13 years. Dozens of awards from prestigious sources such as the Canadian federal gov't, Quebec provincial gov't, Microsoft, and SIIA. Over 800 notable clients including the Pentagon, U.S. Army, State of Wyoming, IBM, three Canadian federal ministries and four American universities. Multi-million per year earnings. And on.

Did my article fail to highlight these notable points sufficiently? If so, it was because I did not want the resource to read like an advertisement. Thanks for your time in clarifying all this for me. Saighe (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry - I just noticed your message regarding notable clients not equaling notability (though I don't know if you posted before or after my query). If my article included the information found on http://www.tenrox.com/en/newsevents/awards.htm, would that be sufficiently notable? Those are all external sources and examples of others recognizing the company as notable. Saighe (talk) 14:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

I would be able to cite and provide links to 3rd party sources for such things as awards and news/magazine articles. As I mentioned before, I was simply concerned that the article come across too much as sales/promotion copy. Is it possible to have the article re-instated with a warning fflag so that I can rework it? Saighe (talk) 14:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Very much appreciated, thank you. Should I contact you to approve the article when it has been re-worked, or should I just publish it again and let it go through natural vetting?Saighe (talk) 14:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Jacksons Fencing

Hi. I was working on that - I spotted a decent notability claim backed up by what might or might not be RS --Dweller (talk) 15:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Cheers. Was just weighing up whether it was good to leave or AfD. What do you think? --Dweller (talk) 16:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

2002 NBA Draft

Hey NawlinW - I was wondering if you could unprotect {{2002 NBA Draft}}. I'm not sure why it was originally protected. I don't see any history of vandalism and none of the other NBA draft templates of this type are protected. Thanks. — X96lee15 (talk) 21:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

• Reduced to semi. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Thanks! That may have been the fastest request fulfillment ever. — X96lee15 (talk) 21:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

help

Hi there I need and admins help on this being that you are from the N.O you are perfect this is about the article rice and beans i have already gotten into a an editing war with an editor called Boston. he keeps on reverting the article back and filling it with his opinions other than facts. When another editor got in the mix to add the proper facts to if. Boston got another editor by the name of jhieves to revert edits for him. Jhieves realized that Boston was using him stopped and admitted that he knows nothing about the subject. The part where the vandalism is talking place is the history. it is a well know fact that the african slaves inroduced certain foods, like jumbo, rice and beans, okra, yams etc to the south, carribean and latin america. This editor name boston keeps on editing the history of the page to his own personal opinions and something he calls the “introduction of asian rice by the Portuguese empire to the Americas” he has no refs and citations to back this claim up. The problem with this 1# this article is about a dish not the so called "introduction of rice". 2# there is no historic record of what he is claiming if you look at the history cultivation of rice rice it didn't originate in asia, it is a native african grain. also the Africans had been cultivating rice for over 3500 years and eating rice and beans before being brought to the Americas #4 The Portuguese did not introduce rice or “Asian” rice to the Americans .and the article is not about the history of rice in America to begin with. it is about the meal rice and beans. Please take a look at the page the discussions and see the foolish and invalid claims this editor Boston is making rice and beans Nillarse (talk) 02:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

• Please see here for another explanation. Thanks. --Boston (talk) 03:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

FYI, I've blocked N as a sock William M. Connolley (talk) 08:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

why was my page deleted im a confused--Veriteo (talk) 13:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC) THe relaiable source i know is in Romania language so it would then that sould help pretty much ok thanks :) I saw it now on the ro wikipedia so can make there thanks anyway for the tip :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Veriteo (talk • contribs) 13:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Help with a page

I created a page about a legitimate company and it was speedily deleted. It does not contain anything from the list of things that will get speedily deleted. May I receive my deleted page to continue editing it to make it more substantial and notable? Any pointers? Thank you.

MattyIsWiki (talk) 16:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Pasha

Hi NawlinWiki, is it possible to learn the reason of your deleting the article pasha? Thanks. --Chapultepec (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, happy edits. --Chapultepec (talk) 18:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Abuse

Can you please remove the abuse from the revision history of my talk page? Thanks -- IRP ☎ 20:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

• Done. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Thanks. -- IRP ☎ 20:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: ESVs

It's a blanket ban for all new users, which is more than just a bit WP:BITE-y. Some of those terms shouldn't be used at all, but some should definitely not be disallowed. Let's please discuss such changes before implementing them. --Conti|✉ 23:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Which accounts do you mean? The ones I've checked were intentionally triggering the filter by adding pretty much any word included in the filter. We should probably split this filter into two, one containing everything that definitely shouldn't be used as an edit summary by anyone ("nimp.org"), and one that indicates problematic behaviour ("Hagrid"). --Conti|✉ 23:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Special:AbuseFilter/58

Please, please, please be careful. You de-autoconfirmed 200 users (fortunately there's a 'batch revert' feature). Test first, then deploy. — Werdna • talk 01:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

The recent change to filter 58 was getting a huge number of false positives. I just spent about half an hour figuring out what was wrong with my edit. If everything's been reverted though I guess I'll go back to what I was doing. -- kenb215 talk 01:34, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Element_93

Is there any way that I can get Corner Grass back because it was speedy deleted due a misunderstanding and I can not get it back to edit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Element 93 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Talk page targeted by 4chan

Just so you know, you have been targeted at 4chan, Someone requested page protection for your talk page. See here at WP:RPP. Momusufan (talk) 17:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

It appears 4chan deleted the thread already, it should be over now. Momusufan (talk) 18:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I'd just as soon leave it unprotected -- beta testing for the abuse filter. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Ms Deja

I noticed you deleted this article, now i recreated it... thanks.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Let's Dance to Joy Division (talk • contribs) 21:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi have just tried to amend a title to a photograph under Spring (the season), the gallery photo said Apple blossom, when it actually appears to be Magnolia Blossom, i tried to edit the mistake but my deletion had been removed, can you tell me why?86.146.199.130 (talk) 21:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Request unprotection of Linkin Park

You semi-protected this back in July. I don't think it's obvious that this is more prone to vandalism than most other articles on Wikiepdia, so I think it's time we try for undeletion. Cheers. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count) • I'm watching this page so just reply to me right here!} 23:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

• Done, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Addition of Link to semi protected article

Greetings,
Can you add Shahrukh Khan filmography to Shahrukh Khan article. Filmography can be reduced on main article as its getting too lengthy. Thanks Oniongas (talk) 01:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Request unprotection of Nelson Mandela

You protected this page because of pagemove-vandalism; but there's no indication of excessive edit vandalism. How would you feel about lifting the edit-protection but of course keeping the pagemove protection? -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count) • I'm watching this page so just reply to me right here!} 16:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

• Done, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy or proposed?

Which type of deletion do you is more appropriate for this article? --Whip it! ^{Now whip it good!} 06:10, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Filter 9

I left a note there for you. If you have any specific diffs that it wasn't catching I'll try to change the regex to match them (email if private). BJ^Talk 10:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Looking for more explanation on why my entry we deleted.

Hi NawlinWiki,

I saw that my entry for 69Mainstreet was deleted. I'm inquiring about what specifically was wrong with it, and what I might do to make sure it can be re-instated. As a new sex business, run by a woman and focusing on the GLBT community, it has a certain uniqueness, and thus, qualifies for inclusion in Wikipedia.

please let me know,

thank you,

Cactus

Cactus Agave (talk) 19:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

User:thegryseone

Hi, I meant to tell you sooner (sorry) that I undid your indefinite block of User:thegryseone after he told me by email his account had been hijacked by a member of his household, which looking at the vandalism appears very plausible. Just so you know. Rd232 ^talk 21:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

User Cmqbdg: Inquiring about a deleted page

Hi NawlinWiki,

I keep trying to see my report on why my page, Dogeared Jewels & Gifts, was deleted. I tried adding the page multiple times, taking out links and pictures, but it is still being deleted for advertising purposes. Is there any time frame that you could give me about when I will find out what I need to do to get my page up? Thanks for your help!

{{editprotected}} I have found some edits that will make my page less like an advertisement but i cannot do it without your permission

-Cmqbdg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmqbdg (talk • contribs) 22:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Be careful, please!

Today you blocked ten accounts with absolutely no contributions for "abusing multiple accounts". These accounts were created by employees of the Wikipedia Usability Initiative for usability testing, as you would have found out had you held back and asked questions instead of pulling the trigger.

Please ask questions before getting heavy-handed with the blocking. — Werdna • talk 23:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Was this you or an impostor? Daniel (talk) 12:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Impostor, please block it. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 12:38, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Requested action at Meta. Regards, Daniel (talk) 12:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Wólka Panieńska

Hi, could you temporarily restore Wólka Panieńska and/or explain why it was deleted? The place does exist so should have an article of some sort.--Kotniski (talk) 07:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

• Restored, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Wyandotte, Michigan edit war

Hi, Nawlin. The situation at Wyandotte, Michigan is just absurd. I've requested that the page be semi-protected, but it was denied. They just said to discuss it, but that clearly has no effect. Users continually add non-notable people (probably some kids adding themselves, really) and reverting attempts to fix it, after countless warnings and two (short) discussions on the talk page. I noticed you were also one to revert the vandalism, and recognized your name from new page patrolling, so came to you. I've never actually been involved with this sort of thing, so forgive my ignorance if it's showing, but is there something you might be able to do? Thanks in advance, either way. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 18:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, NawlinWiki. You have new messages at Unforgiven24's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ezekiel

Thanks for that. I was not getting the move to work. Possibly you had already done it behind my back.... Ta, anyway. Peridon (talk) 21:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Request unprotection of Iraq

Same reason as in my last two requests for unprotection. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count) • I'm watching this page so just reply to me right here!} 21:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

usabilitywiki

You've got an imposter -- eventually that will be blocked & renamed - after that would you please create an account there (and on the two sub-sites: /sandbox and /prototype)? Thanks  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 22:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Special:RenameUser is not available on this wiki. If you want to usurp this account, MediaWiki would be needed to be updated there. A new "NawlinWiki"-account could then be created for you sending you a registration mail. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

• • I'd like to do that, just to prevent future issues, but no hurry. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:18, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Impostor accts

Thanks for the blocks, I notified the user they were impersonating. :) — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 13:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Request

As an 'established' (Need a refrence :-)) member of the wiki community I know you have a lot of running round deleting articles but would it be possible (for newer members such as myself) to expand and help with the development of an article someone has made rather than just deleating, I don't mean putting in hours of effot to make it viable but rather just a message on the talk page saying why you felt it needed to be deleated and saying how it could be improved. Obvioulsy this would not be applicable to all scenarios but as the person who removes work it would be nice for a little more feedback as opposed to a link aimed at a much wider target. If anything it would help stop people being bitter (like futher up). --LasCummins (talk) 17:21, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Here is the deletion log entry, showing A1 as the criterion. Having looked at the article myself, I'm wondering if it notable enough (I might have chosen A7 as the deletion rationale myself).  Frank  |  talk  17:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Nawlin SundanceSpa

You deleted an article I just started writing on sundance spas I was in the middle of adding the permission/sources. I am an authorized Sundance Spa repair center and have explict permission I also know the founder and intended to be purely informative. I was linking to the product support pdf on my website that Sundance allows the only possible reason I could see why you deleted it? I mean I was just adding/testing the related links and I hit save again and then I see your message. I find this ridiculous you delete my entry as I'm updating it yet if you even bothered to read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacuzzi you will see the blatant advertising in there external links you see that ? http://www.hottubsets.com/. I'm watching this page for a response I hope it's as timely as it took you to delete my page I also thought I would get a chance to protest it..

Request to restore Kenneth Cooper, harpsichordist

You cite A7 as your reason (not including the importance or significance of the subject), and I have never seen the article. But, when I needed it (trying to supplement the poor notes on one of the recordings Mr. Cooper is on), it wasn't there. And he's made dozens of recordings (with Yo-Yo Ma and Judith Blegen, among others), and is on the sound-tracks to the movie Valmont and the documentary Van Gogh Revisited (among others), and the video game Louis Cat Orze. Beyond this, Cooper has been the harpsichordist and/or conductor in hundreds of concerts and recitals, and been on Live From Lincoln Center. No one would question the other Kenneth Cooper (the aerobics specialist and motivational speaker) being on Wikipedia: I would not question this musician's place here either. I hope you reconsider. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryszardk (talk • contribs) 18:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

• This was the entire content of the article that was deleted: "Kenneth Cooper is a harpsichordist residing in New York City. He teaches at The Manhattan School of Music. He also performs on fortepiano." I agree that we could use a better article -- feel free to write it, since you seem to know about him. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 18:37, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Zero reject

Just venting a little frustration here...

On the Zero reject article that you just deleted, I had placed a CSD5 tag on it saying I was researching it, and then after researching I declined the speedy with a edit summary of "There's context, and it's even a notable concept. Will attempt a rewrite". In the three minutes that rewrite took, you deleted the article as an A1 speedy.

Not picking on you specifically, but this happens often enough to leave me frustrated. (Where I've declined a speedy and another admin deletes in the few minutes it takes me to write an acceptable stub, without looking at the edit summary before deletion.) Any suggestions on how to solve this problem?--Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

• Sorry -- the CSD5 tag would have kept me from deleting, but it was gone when I saw the article. I should have looked at the history, though. On the other hand, the one sentence that was there was pretty incoherent, and I don't think anyone was missing much not being able to access that sentence in the couple of minutes until you posted your version. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism & Content Policy Violations Notice

Hi! There are several unregistered IP addresses repeatedly vandalizing an article (profanity, unverifiable claims, malicious links) for the Fortune 500 CEO Mark Hurd. I'm hoping you will take a look at the recent history and use your privileges to "semi protect" the article so that we can find consensus among registered users about the content.

Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spimeco (talk • contribs) 22:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Talk

Why is my talk page locked now? Nite Owl II 04:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• Oh crap, well if that's the case then could you also lock my user page for me for the time being? Thank you for notifying me, I've been warned about him before by Alison (before she left Wikipedia). Nite Owl II 04:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• Well, now he's trying to post the dox of the admins on there, but just for the heck of it they're making his article the AotN for the 28th and 29th to mess with him. In all honesty I thought he used to be somewhat funny with his trolling but now he's just lost it since his own dox was posted and made into a website. I still don't understand why he's attacking ED now anyways. Nite Owl II 23:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

vandal

Thanks for that. I think I've CU'ed about 200 or so accounts since yesterday and passed the CU data off to Checkuser-I. :/ How exactly is Grawp able to bypass the ACB feature for IP blocks? And how is he getting past the user creation throttles? Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Nishkid64, the answer to your question is here. Also when you use TOR (or SUL for that matter) mediawiki sometimes treats you differently. --Chris 07:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

TurnItUp Media

Why do you keep deleting TurnItUp Media? It is written exactly like SpiralFrog a former competitor prior to their demise. Every bit of detail in there is factual and business related. If you remove TurnItUp Media, then you need to remove every other type out there. SpiralFrog, QTrax, iMeem, we7, emusic, mp3.com,etc... we are all the same type. Wmfleming (talk) 08:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• (1) Because you've cited no sources (see WP:V) to show the notability of your company per WP:WEB (the sources you cited refer to competitors, not TurnItUp); (2) you're writing about your own company, in violation of WP:COI. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Michael Manning, Low Art 2009

Ummm... Hiya,

Well, I wanted to say that I think my article was well cited, notable due to citing platinum status producers, (whom you can call, if need be), well put together, referenced, and very valid. If you could, please reinstate the article, or submit to me a few good reasons, things I could improve, to help make the article more valid.

The article was located at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Manning_(musician) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Izzyiscariot (talk • contribs) 11:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• Doesn't meet WP:BAND, only source cited was MySpace. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

I didn't cite a myspace. I cited Billy Atwell, David Musial, two platinum status music producers from NYC. I also cited Youtube, I cited Archive.org, the internet library, I cited SEVERAL things, ---- but not one of them was myspace. Izzyiscariot (talk) 12:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• • My mistake, I was looking at what you cited to me, Michael Manning (musician), rather than what I deleted, Michael Manning (Musician). That said, those sources refer to people other than Mr. Manning. Has Mr. Manning himself been discussed in any reliable independent sources? NawlinWiki (talk) 12:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

It has not been reviewed independantly, but if it helps I've been in negotiations with Smart Trax LLC, and David Musial, whom has done works for the US Department of Education, and has been hailed worldwide as a multimedia producer. Also, Billy Atwell has commented on the work "Great take on that hippie shit Jefferson Airplane stuff! Bell bottoms make me want to join the Marines, lol! Your stuff is always profoundly visual." - Despite its informality, I'm sure that this meets the qualifications for notability, and I'm sure that several articles in the encyclopedia are not reviewed by independent sources or magazines. Perhaps I'm mistaken? Izzyiscariot (talk) 12:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• Yes, you're mistaken -- subjects of articles here all need to have reliable independent sources. If there are some out there that don't, it just means we haven't found them yet, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Please consider reposting the article *when* Mr. Manning gets some independent recognition, not before. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Ah, well thank you for clarification, is it possible to retrieve the source code for now when independent review is made available? Please mailto: izrafeli@gmail.com Izzyiscariot (talk) 12:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Is that possible? Izzyiscariot (talk) 12:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Ali shikheey

Can I ask which part of WP:FOOTY this person meets? Nuttah (talk) 17:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

The club is notable if it is above tier 11. For players the usual standard is to have played in a fully professional league (Tiers 1 to 4 in England). Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability. Nuttah (talk) 17:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

No problems. It was just one I really didn't expect to get bounced and I just couldn't work out what claim I'd missed in the article. Nuttah (talk) 18:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for Sean Kennedy (Author)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Sean Kennedy (Author). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CelticWonder (talk) 17:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Aging recipe

Regarding the person called "nawlin" editing the "Aging recipe" page: dear Nawlin, the page was changed to neutral, professional and adds free style, as I was advised. Thus could you explain to me who is the person with no education who read my page for 3 min and decided on what reasons to delete it? ps: if you do not understand my definition, then ask me to try to make it more user friendly. Note however that this term in the first place is for people with at least 3 years biology degree. Moreover could you send me an email with your answer. Many thanks Professor Whom —Preceding unsigned comment added by Professorwhom (talk • contribs) 21:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Special:AbuseFilter/history/52/item/265

Please be careful. That's the second very heavy-handed filter you've added with huge numbers of false positives, set immediately to disallow. It blocked words like 'thrust', 'nigger', 'rubeus', links to certain websites, 'must-see', 'cum', 'new location', and so on. ALL of these words have legitimate uses, and you caught a huge number of false positives.

I encourage you to think about every filter you're adding, and about whether it has a chance to cause false positives. If you're in any doubt at all, you must test that filter to make sure it doesn't cause any false positives! Remember that one bad filter with tens of false positives causes far more damage than ten vandal edits getting through (and let's be realistic, they'll always get through until we turn on blocking, filter or no filter).

A sample of false positives from that filter:

(recent)

• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&details=58727
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&details=32795
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&details=32174

(immediately after its introduction)

• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&details=3076
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&details=13815
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&details=17369
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&details=29639
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&details=30304
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&details=30313
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&details=30316

... I'm sure you get the picture.

Given that this is a second instance, if your filters continue to block legitimate edits in large numbers, we may need to think about some way of reducing the number of false positives your filters generate, including requiring your filters be reviewed by other users or discussing your write access to the abuse filter. — Werdna • talk 02:44, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Essential Eating Sprouted Foods

Please excuse any infractions as I am new to this process. This in no way intended to be an advertisement and followed the guidelines, using the same template as other food companies. This is a small company that is revolutionizing the flour milling industry and I felt the information was very WP worthy. The company authorized me to share their information. Now I realize that I may not be WP savvy enough to format it correctly. But I am willing to learn and follow directions.

Can you help or is there someone who can assist with correcting this? Unfortunately, I have spent many, many hours editing the information, just to have it removed. Specific suggestions would help.

Thank you for your assistance and where do I go from here? I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this talk is formatted correctly! Jaaq (talk) 08:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Capril

Why did you delete Capril? Capril (Cape April) is a charity event which will be held for the first time this year in Australia as an awareness event for depression and in memory of Australian actor/writer/comedian Richard Marsland. It is inspired by the radio stunt, Capril, done for the Australian radio show Get This on the Triple M network. It's not fair to delete a page without actually trying to confirm that it is real. Could we please have it back? I've worked hard on Capril as a charity event and don't expect to see it treated as rubbish and nonsense. Many thanks for at least reading this.

---

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesevquis (talk • contribs) 12:15, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

• "Real" is not the same thing as "notable" per WP:N. Also, you shouldn't be using Wikipedia to promote your own event. See WP:COI and WP:SPAM. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

The Capril page wasn't setup by myself, a participant had decided this on his own. Real means it's real. Notable means you just think it should be world wide, well it's the first run, sheesh, how can it be considered "notable" yet? Still, if you want to play Adolf Hitler then all heil mein furher! There are many people who would already consider this event notable here in Australia now. Way to poop on charity sunshine!

---

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesevquis (talk • contribs) 22:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Tweetdeck

Can I ask why you deleted the article? As I said in the Talkpage I know it didn't have any references yet but I honestly thought it was used enough & by enough people now to be in Wikipedia? Just interested why you deleted it? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dottydotdot (talk • contribs) 15:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

64.150.240.159

Hi, could you block 64.150.240.159 from editing his/her talk page please? They are abusing it. Cheers - Kingpin13 (talk) 16:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

• Done, thanks. --NawlinWiki (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Endless-Online Recreating The Page

I am a player and I'm getting tired of telling people about the game, I would like to start a page for the game! I can see that it's been deleted a number of times! Most of them in 2007, if I start it up again will you allow it to stay up! I will keep up with it and make sure that there isn't anything untrue or inapprooreate on the page.

Also why did you delete the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Setokira (talk • contribs) 18:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

• If you can show by reliable independent sources (WP:V) that the game meets the notability requirements of WP:WEB, then it is OK to repost. When I deleted the page in 2007, its entire content was: "Endless is a 2d anime based online mmorpg. Once playing our online rpg you can become rich and famous, fight evil monsters, become a hero or live as a normal citizen." NawlinWiki (talk) 18:49, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Dragonfly Effect

Thanks for deleting Thomas Oliverius. Could you have a look at Dragonfly Effect? It appears to be directly related. I already tagged it for AFD, but I could close that if you think speedy could be applied. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 18:48, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, perhaps the same policy could be applied to Chaos Theory (essay)? Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 20:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Help With A Page (2nd Request)

I created a page about a legitimate company and it was speedily deleted. It does not contain anything from the list of things that will get speedily deleted. This is my 2nd request to receive my deleted page to continue editing it to make it more substantial and notable? Any pointers? Thank you again.

MattyIsWiki (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Starting a New Wiki

NawlinWiki, I do not know what I am doing wrong. I am trying to write a page for non-profit call Walking with Africans Foundation, but it has been removed twice. What am I doing wrong? I am trying to use an impartial style of writing and trying to list references. Is there a formal way to write it? I was told that wikipedia is a living document, an Encyclopedia for the internet. One request, if it is not perfect, then can you please revise the wiki instead of deleting it? thanks, Dave--Act5016 (talk) 22:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I just want to knwo why my article was deleted! --8675EO9 (talk) 00:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Jaaq/Essential Eating Sprouted Foods

Thank you!! I'll go to work on the revision. I am waiting on some information that will be helpful. Is it possible for you to review prior to a reposting? Jaaq (talk) 00:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Past attacks on you

Hi NawlinWiki, is there any way that this username [4] and these edit summaries [5] can be blanked or removed by yourself or another admin? I really feel it is not fair to you that these evil actions remain on WP. Regards, WWGB (talk) 01:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

• It's just Jarlaxle/Grawp. To remove those, you need to find an oversighter -- those pages are too big to delete and restore without the offending edits. But thanks for asking. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:09, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Sean Kennedy (Author) to stay in Wikipedia

I respectfully request you reconsider your decision for "endorsing deletion". I believe there have been many productive responses to concerns on the deletion review page as well as additional references and notability entries (#1/#2) added to the article. Thank you very much for your time. CelticWonder (talk) 05:51, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Email

You have one. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 16:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Renames

No. If they have been created, it is something that needs to be investigated immediately. However, make sure it isn't a problem of the software. A user should still be able to log into their old name up to a few days after the rename because the software puts renames on a rather low priority. It may be that the accounts have not been fully removed. bibliomaniac15 00:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

• Usurping old renamed account names is a favorite practice of one of our well-known serial vandals. If there's no legitimate use for these, I'll go ahead and block them. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 00:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

I pointed this out on Biblio's page as well... but a lot of established users will create doppleganger accounts under their old name when they get a name change. When I looked at the three pages you referenced, they were all pointing to what I assume are the users new usernames. In that case, they are completely appropriate. I mean, I have my original user name pointing to my new account. Now, if they were not simply pointing to the new account, then there would be a concern.---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 04:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Chew Lips to stay in Wikipedia

You've speedily deleted a page I created for the band 'CHEW LiPS'. Please reinstate. It's my opinion that the band warrants an entry in Wikipedia since they meet #1 of the WP:MUSIC rules: subject of multiple non-trivial published works. I provided three references in my original article but here are more:

http://www.the-fly.co.uk/words/reviews/single-reviews/4373/chew-lips http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/introducing/artists/chewlips/ http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/nov/25/new-band-chew-lips http://news.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/hi/music/newsid_7910000/7910140.stm http://www.bbc.co.uk/electricproms/2008/artists/chewlips/ http://www.last.fm/music/Chew+Lips http://this.bigstereo.net/2009/03/25/chew-lips-tepr/ http://www.pinglewood.com/2008/December/321_Chew_Lips.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbc richardb (talk • contribs) 09:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my userpage

Appreciate the attention. :-)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

you deleted my page that was under construction

Excuse me but there are ALL kinds of sports people, actors and other 'real people' on the wiki ... I am a sports figure (a historic fencer) and not sure why I can't have a page like all other sports figures ... and I even had my page under construction Jennifer Brock (talk)Jennifer Brock —Preceding undated comment added 17:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC).

Please revert White Door Consulting

I had today been given 7 days notice and was in the middle of adding verifyable sources —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lundygroom (talk • contribs) 17:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

TheOtaku

My article on TheOtaku was speedily deleted. I was just wondering if there is any saved form of it anywhere so that I could work on it, and attempt to make it acceptable. I have no personal save of it, so I was hoping that I could find it in the history somewhere. Does it exist? I would rather not start over. Thank you! (Einarath (talk) 19:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC))

Thank you for the quick reply and the recommendation! (Einarath (talk) 20:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC))

Stop Drop'n Skank

You deleted my article on the acclaimed Toronto band Stop Drop'n Skank. You said this was because they did not have any achievement that would allow the band to have a wikipedia article when i clearly stated that it had a good reviewed album on iTunes. I even edited my article to say that Stop Drop'n Skank was most successful for there album on iTunes, and i also put under the article's discussion page exactly why it should not be deleted yet you still deleted it. I am suspecting that you only deleted the article because yo had not heard of the band and you disproved of the name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FunMan3344 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Addition to DRV process

Hi, you've been active as an administrator in the DRV process in the past so I would appreciate your comments on my suggested change to DRV requirements. Thanks! Usrnme h8er (talk · contribs) 09:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Note re deleted article

Hey Nawlin - Just wanted to mention that an article you deleted twice, Sant Baba Resham Singh Ji, has been recreated under the name Sant baba resham singh ji. I think you are right that the article's subject is not notable, and I'm happy to look into the matter if you are busy, but I'll need a few hours to get to it. Thanks, & thanks for all the good work new page patrolling. FlyingToaster 17:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

---

About Philatino!!

Hello Nawlin, I'm recreating the text. And I think it's important because it is about a really small company of real philatelist that ended being a company that compites with e-bay. I'm trying to recreate it. Please, have me some patience, my english isn't very good and I'm learning how to use wikipedia tools. Please, tell me to change it before you delete it. Thank you!! Sylvia. Sylvia.Plath07 (talk) 18:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Verify the text

Please, Nawlin, explain me how can I proof or verify the information I posted in philatino, I have a little piece of the text I posted in the page philatino.com and I have the permition to post it, but what can I do to post my text??? Sylvia. Sylvia.Plath07 (talk) 19:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of the Brittany Smyth Page

Hello, I'm looking for some information regarding why the Brittany Smyth page was once again deleted from Wikipedia. After several deletion requests it was determined that a different style of writing as well as more clarity was needed. I fixed this, and it was determined that the article would stay. Now I see you've deleted it. Why? The article was very clear, neutral, and well sourced. ARMY101 (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

• But it didn't say anything about Ms. Smyth other than her involvement in the Shinerama controversy, which is discussed at great length in Carleton University Students' Association. See WP:BLP1E: "If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted." NawlinWiki (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

JavaBeats.FM

There are over 2,000 listeners at this very moment! Please check for yourself at http://www.javabeats.fm or http://www.shoutcast.com/genre/Techno

I ask that you please change your decision for deletion of this wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.98.198.16 (talk) 22:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)