Naqqash6

Your submission at Articles for creation: Franklin Obeng-Odoom (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Franklin Obeng-Odoom may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Naqqash6! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft: Franklin Obeng-Odoom

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft: Franklin Obeng-Odoom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Naqqash6! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Dr Franklin Obeng-Odoom, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Franklin Obeng-Odoom, you may be blocked from editing. S0091 (talk) 20:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Naqqash6. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Franklin Obeng-Odoom, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 20:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

It is clear you have an affiliation with Franklin Obeng-Odoom so you need to cease editing the article and certainly removing any of the maintenance tags or you may be blocked. S0091 (talk) 20:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

I donot have any affiliation with Obeng-Odoom, i have solve issues in article kindly remove maintenance tags or kindly guide me what more can i do to remove those maintenance templates thanks Naqqash6 (talk) 11:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

According to you, the photo is your work which means you know him unless that is not true. If is not your work, then it is a copyright violation so needs to be deleted. Please clarify. S0091 (talk) 16:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

I do not know him personally I ask him to use his photo through email and gave me permission for that. Naqqash6 (talk) 17:04, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Ok, so it is not your work. In order for the image to be used on Wikipedia, the copyright holder has to release it under a compatible license, which is Veikko Somerpuro not Obeng-Odoom. An editor on Commons (different project than the English Wikipedia) has requested it be deleted so you will need to handle it there. Also, just make sure we have everything under the COI guideline covered, are you being paid or work for a firm that is being paid to create the article? S0091 (talk) 18:31, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

ok thanks, no i am not being paid. Naqqash6 (talk) 18:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Naqqash6. In the future please be mindful of copyrights. Do not copy other people's work and claim it is your own. Thus far, you have had a couple copyright violations with text and images, which can have legal repercussions for both you and Wikipedia. S0091 (talk) 19:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tammy Tran

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tammy Tran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 20:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Naqqash6! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Obeng-Odoom (Professor).jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Obeng-Odoom (Professor).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jonteemil (talk) 06:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Minh-Tam Tran Lawyer.png

Thanks for uploading File:Minh-Tam Tran Lawyer.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Tammy Tran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tammy Tran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tammy Tran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 17:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello Naqqash6. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Tammy Tran, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Naqqash6. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Naqqash6|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 18:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I am not get paid anything, i am new at wikipedia and learning... Naqqash6 (talk) 19:34, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

You created two articles and have uploaded photos about those subjects both of which you state the subjects have emailed the photos to you. One you stated you were the the owner which was not true. That means you know them in some way. One might be understandable but not two. Also, unless they are the photographer or are the copyright holder they cannot give you or anyone else permission to use it. S0091 (talk) 19:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

when i was writing article on them i find there email, i dont know about licence so i thought it is the best way to get permission from them through email that why i emailed them and ask for their permission to use picture in their article and they replied with permission. Naqqash6 (talk) 20:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

kindly guide and advice me, how can i get permission from them so i could upload their picture.

thanks Naqqash6 (talk) 20:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

The last thing you need to worry about are photos. If you do not know about copyright then you shouldn't be uploading images. Period. The most crucial is ensuring the subject about which you are writing meets the relevant notability guidelines. Otherwise you are wasting your time and that of other editors. S0091 (talk) 20:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)