Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Naqash.sakhawat! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:14, Saturday, February 11, 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Farooq Siddiqi

edit
 

The article Farooq Siddiqi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence for notability. Article created by an SPA complete with citation tag suggesting a copy and paste move from another article. I cannot find the article name in any of the references. May be a hoax

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Velella  Velella Talk   10:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Velella:Thanks your Quick support. I mentioned all reference exactly who i mentioned in Article. I recheck it.Naqash.sakhawat (talk) 10:26, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Farooq Siddiqi

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Farooq Siddiqi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. –Dream out loud (talk) 19:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Naqash.sakhawat, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Naqash.sakhawat (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #17520 was submitted on Feb 13, 2017 13:29:29. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 13:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Naqash.sakhawat (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #17526 was submitted on Feb 14, 2017 00:35:10. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 00:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

I received your unblock request through email. The problem is not that you created an article on Farooq Siddiqi but that you've evaded a previous block by creating multiple accounts. The previous block was for several reasons, among them that you were editing disruptively. Your article seems to have been sourced enough to avoid speedy deletion this time, which does address one of the reasons why you were initially blocked. However, if you want to be unblocked, you will need to address the other concerns: repeatedly recreating deleted articles, using multiple accounts, and disruptive editing. From what I can tell, you're simply repeating the unblock requests made in User talk:Naqash3000, and that's usually not a good idea. It's better to read through WP:GAB and try to address the reasons why the previous request was rejected. If you don't understand why, I'm not really sure what to suggest. You could ask questions here, and maybe someone will assist you. Keep in mind that Wikipedia is staffed by volunteers, though. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
Good Work NaqashKashmiri (talk) 14:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Naqash.sakhawat/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, Naqash.sakhawat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. LinguistunEinsuno 17:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Farooq Siddiqi for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farooq Siddiqi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farooq Siddiqi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 18:17, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply