User talk:Momo Monitor/Archive 1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by EdJohnston in topic Multiple accounts
Archive 1

Proposed deletion of Jörg Meuthen

  Requesting immediate archiving...

 

The article Jörg Meuthen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 23:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

  Requesting immediate archiving...   Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Genital modification and mutilation. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. It's pretty clear to me that you chose the name (Male Genital Mutilation (MGM)) because the one without the parenthetic abbreviation was already taken--this is reminiscent of the kind of behavior we've seen here from Men's Rights Movement warriors. I pointed you to the Circumcision talk page; kindly review that page and the archives. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Genital modification and mutilation. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 03:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Ian.thomson (talk) 13:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Momo Monitor (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Users like this guy are bloody vandals. They are deleting contributions with ten academic journals as sources, claiming that I'm soapboxing. Honestly, ban these people. Momo Monitor (talk) 13:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked for edit warring, in particular for violating the three revert rule. You'll need to address that, and only that, in any future unblock request. Content disputes are not vandalism.--jpgordon::==( o ) 13:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Male Genital Mutilation

  Requesting immediate archiving...

Mutilation of male genitals takes place in 25% of societies and takes very broad shapes. It reduces the insemination efficiency and is "impairing sperm competition". The "sexual conflict" hypothesis suggests an association between polygyny and MGM. Those rituals often give access to social benefits. The MGM rituals are performed by a nonrelative and in public, watched by men in particular. The surgery is often dangerous and complicated. The costs outweigh the social benefits. The cause of the male genital mutilation is holding old men competitive or used in warfare.[1][2][3][4][5][6] Sometimes the ritual is a self-mutilation.[7][8][9][10]

Nomination of Paper Abortion for deletion

  Requesting immediate archiving...

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paper Abortion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paper Abortion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 15:59, 14 March 2016 (UTC)   --Momo Monitor (talk) 14:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

  Requesting immediate archiving...

Hello, Momo Monitor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Multiple accounts

Per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Momo Monitor. EdJohnston (talk) 04:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

  1. ^ Wilson, Christopher G. (2008-05-01). "Male genital mutilation: an adaptation to sexual conflict". Evolution and Human Behavior. 29 (3): 149–164. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.11.008. ISSN 1090-5138. Retrieved 2016-04-21.
  2. ^ Menage, Janet (1993-09-11). "Male genital mutilation". BMJ : British Medical Journal. 307 (6905). Retrieved 2016-04-21.
  3. ^ "Male and Female Circumcision". Google Books. 2016-04-14. Retrieved 2016-04-21.
  4. ^ Johnson, Matthew (2010-06-01). "Male genital mutilation: Beyond the tolerable?". Ethnicities. 10 (2): 181–207. doi:10.1177/1468796810361654. ISSN 1468-7968. Retrieved 2016-04-21.
  5. ^ Hinchley, Geoff (2007-12-06). "Is infant male circumcision an abuse of the rights of the child? Yes". BMJ. 335 (7631): 1180–1180. doi:10.1136/bmj.39406.520498.AD. ISSN 0959-8138. PMID 18063640. Retrieved 2016-04-21.
  6. ^ Harrington, Charles (1968). "Sexual Differentiation in Socialization and Some Male Genital Mutilations". American Anthropologist. 70 (5). Wiley-Blackwell: 951–956. doi:10.1525/aa.1968.70.5.02a00120. Retrieved 2016-04-21.
  7. ^ Greilsheimer, Howard; Groves, James E. (1979-04-01). "Male Genital Self-mutilation". Archives of General Psychiatry. 36 (4): 441–446. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1979.01780040083009. ISSN 0003-990X. Retrieved 2016-04-21.
  8. ^ Martin, T.; Gattaz, W.F. (1991-07-01). "Psychiatric Aspects of Male Genital Self-Mutilation". Psychopathology. 24 (3): 170–178. doi:10.1159/000284711. ISSN 1423-033X. Retrieved 2016-04-21.
  9. ^ Nakaya, M. (1996-07-01). "On Background Factors of Male Genital Self-Mutilation". Psychopathology. 29 (4): 242–248. doi:10.1159/000285000. ISSN 1423-033X. Retrieved 2016-04-21.
  10. ^ CS, Romilly; MT, Isaac. "Male genital self-mutilation". British journal of hospital medicine. 55 (7): 427–431. ISSN 0007-1064. PMID 8730568. Retrieved 2016-04-21.