MisterWawawa
Welcome!
editHello, MisterWawawa! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking  or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. |
|---|
|
|
February 2024
edit
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to James A. Garfield have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Peaceray (talk) 20:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Shreky (February 4)
edit
|
Hello, MisterWawawa!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBritinator (talk) 21:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shreky
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Shreky, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
MisterWawawa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn’t know about the sandbox until it was too late and I didn’t intend to cause any harm MisterWawawa (talk) 01:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You don't tell what edits you wish to make, we won't unblock you to just fool around in the sandbox. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MisterWawawa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Even if I did somehow break a rule, vandalism requires at least 3 warnings before a permanent block, so, you are just violating your own rules. MisterWawawa (talk) 19:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MisterWawawa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I should be allowed back as I did make a couple edits that are fine like that microphone edit where I was showing you how a microphone works. Another issue is that you guys think that it is ok to ban someone for no reason even though every single person uses a VPN to work around a ban, thank you for listening.MisterWawawa (talk) 3:21 pm, Today (UTC−5)
Decline reason:
I'm afraid that's utter rubbish. Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please place all new unblock requests at the bottom of this page instead of in the middle. Thanks! --Yamla (talk) 20:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
MisterWawawa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ok, I admit to this that I did vandalize even though it was obviously a joke. If you review my edit history, it isn’t anywhere near as bad as some vandals on this site who aren’t banned. It is fine to keep me banned as long as you just shorten my block. - sincerely, wax3 MisterWawawa (talk)
Decline reason:
This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
- Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
- Reading our guide to improving articles.
- Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
- Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
- Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:
{{infobox name|...}}), - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this:
[[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]), - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:
[[Category:Name]]), - and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:
{{Foo stub}});
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:
- Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this:
== [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet; - Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "
Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution." - You can now save the page. However, if your edits have any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose:
{{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click .
- Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
- When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 14:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MisterWawawa (talk) 02:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
MisterWawawa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hey, unblock me. I found an error in the article about hyperinflation. Why when it says China, it shows the flag of Taiwan? Is it Taiwan or China? ~~
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
PhilKnight gave you a possible path back to editing four months ago. You have chosen to ignore it, just as you previously ignored what admins said.
In any case, what you pointed out isn't an error, so I'm not sure how that helps your case; the relevant flag on that list is the one that was relevant to the listed hyperinflation of April 1949, and it is the correct one. These details matter. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 10:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Any other way? I will not do anything bad. Please reconsider this utterly moronic decision. MisterWawawa (talk) 19:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's not wise to insult the people who are deciding whether you should be unblocked. That sort of behavior could result in you losing the ability to edit this talk page. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, ok. I understand. MisterWawawa (talk) 20:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- An administrator gave you an actual path which may lead to being unblocked. If you're unwilling to demonstrate a constructive edit, then why would anyone unblock you for the promise of constructive editing? You ought to take the path that was offered to you in February before it's too late. It's very likely that once an administrator feels that your talk page edits are not constructive, your talk page access will be removed. That makes it much harder to get unblocked because you'll only be able to unblock requests through the WP:UTRS. I don't think I have any more productive advice to offer, so I wish you good fortune. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 22:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's not wise to insult the people who are deciding whether you should be unblocked. That sort of behavior could result in you losing the ability to edit this talk page. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)