User talk:Meeanaya/Archives/2019/July

Welcome!

edit
 
A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Meeanaya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You did a great job on writing the article Rathasena Mata Temple, so I hope you like the place and decide to stay! Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you ever need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I am so glad you are here! –MJLTalk 18:47, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Nandeshwar Lake

edit

Hello, Meeanaya,

Thanks for creating Nandeshwar Lake! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Nandeshwar Mahadev Temple

edit

Hello, Meeanaya,

Thanks for creating Nandeshwar Mahadev Temple! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Irene Roberts

edit

Hi, you didn't actually nominate this for deletion, you just added a link to a 2006 AFD. Therefore I have removed the AFD notice from the page. If you still wish to nominate the page for deletion, please follow the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO, noting what to do if the article has been nominated before. Thank you. — 🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬 06:23, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion declined: Danielle Mastrion

edit

Hello Meeanaya, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Danielle Mastrion, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 07:29, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Purnima Gupta  ==

Hi, we have improved about article. Please remove your deletion in our page. If still you want us to improve our article on Purnima Gupta please revert us back. ( Pavithra12 (talk) 08:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC) )Reply

Purnima Gupta

edit

I am sorry but I must ask you why you added Purnima Gupta to "the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions" ? FYI in modern times Astronomy is NOT related to Astrology. -- Bayoustarwatch (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Alsigarh) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Alsigarh.

User:Lapablo while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lapablo}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lapablo (talk) 11:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion

edit

Hello Meeanaya -- Could I ask you to slow down with applying speedy deletion tags and re-read the rules for A7 carefully? The summary is that "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines." Mauro Castagnaro, when you tagged it, already had at least one claim that would have been enough to meet the A7 criteria. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 11:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please follow Espresso Addict's advice rather than continue with obviously incorrect speedy deletion nominations such as Bdood, Fiona Lazareff and Avni Shah. You are obviously keen to help, but you need to adjust your sights considerably before applying any more speedy deletion tags. Phil Bridger (talk) 07:22, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

DELETION OF AN ARTICLE GOODLUCK MATHIAS

edit

Hello, i saw notification of speedy deletion of the new page i just created.

I do not really understand why you do this i think you should review a person before doing this

Kindly retrieve my page as he is a signifacant person and i know someone will add contents about him later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pundorikaku (talkcontribs) 13:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Qais Qandil Biography

edit

Good Day

why this page was considered for deletion?

it satisfies all conditions of Wikipedia, and it is not been created by a paid member, which is me, I am not getting paid for this.

please, update me with the needful to keep it for public view.

Best Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misfits2019 (talkcontribs) 09:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Giga Ltd

edit

Hello Meeanaya Regarding nomination Giga Ltd for deletion, I believe the articles contain sufficient information about the ISP firm, actually better than other existing ISP firm pages on Wikipedia, such as Andrews & Arnold. But I will be glad to improve the article as much as possible. Mohamed Benazzouz (talk) 13:22, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Moving to drafts

edit

Hello Meeanaya, I'd recommend using the script User:Evad37/MoveToDraft when moving articles to drafts, the script performs the necessary cleanup tasks such as marking the old redirect for deletion, notifying the author, and adding {{draft}} to the article (without which the user won't know how to publish their article for review).

I also want to recommend that you try to limit WP:OVERTAGGING, too many tags are often not helpful. You might want to consider spending a few weeks expanding some already existing articles since experience in writing good and well-referenced content is always beneficial.

Best, --89.153.169.78 (talk) 14:35, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apoorva Mehta

edit

Just FYI, you don't need to send an article to AfD to "merge and redirect", which counts as a form of "keep" in an AfD discussion as the page history has to be kept when merging articles. You can propose merges on article talk pages, or do them yourself when they are obviously appropriate. For more information see WP:MERGE#Proposing a merge. Happy editing! – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 09:09, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

filelakeshoe, thanks will keep this in mind. Meeanaya (talk) 04:54, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Phanindra Sama

edit

How can you delete this page ? . All reference are very reliable these are from prestigious newspaper.This is fullfill all the policyand guidelines of Wikipedia

User:Abhishek shannu, let's talk on AFD. Meeanaya (talk) 05:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion nomination of Ritesh Agarwal

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ritesh Agarwal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — kashmīrī TALK 19:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply