Welcome!

edit
Hello, Mathewscott1983! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Nzd (talk) 13:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

June 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Jessica Carter, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:54, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Caroline Weir, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Caroline Weir. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Caroline Weir. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emily Allen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Refs on squad additions

edit

Hi there, thanks for your contributions. Could I just ask that you double-check that the refs look OK before adding please? I have now had to fix several entries added to the squad list at West Ham United L.F.C.. Using the preview function will show you if it's OK (if the added reference contains red text, then it's not quite right). Your common mistake appears to be not closing the ref tag properly (note that the end of the line should look like "refurl}}</ref>}}", with two sets of curly brackets). Could you also include the full URL of the reference, rather than just linking to https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/ please? Generic links aren't very helpful beyond the immediate present. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 11:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Brianna Visalli

edit

I have moved your article to Draft:Brianna Visalli until such time as you have found some references. Deb (talk) 15:07, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Junior Kabananga. GiantSnowman 14:24, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jessica Carter. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:39, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Veatriki Sarri, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 20:38, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Diane Caldwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Defender
Kubanochka Krasnodar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Natalya Sokolova

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

{{Updated}}

edit

Why on earth do you keep changing that when there's not been any other updates? What possible benefit is there? Make meaningful edits. Keep changing the last updated line every few days is just annoying. -- KTC (talk) 19:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I second this sentiment. Please stop doing that. Are you trying to get your edit count up or something? Nzd (talk) 20:14, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I see that you have been continung to do this. If there is something you are trying to achieve that I'm not understanding, please let me know. Maybe I can help. However, when other editors have advised against doing something, and you continue the practice, that starts to become a problem.
I think you could be a great editor here. I have often seen you make valid and useful changes, but your previous blocks and apparent reticence to communicate suggest that you could be in line for further problems. Please do take the time to listen to other editors when they are trying to guide you. Again, I'm happy to help with anything you need. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 11:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Snowflake91 (talk) 14:38, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Let me make the above warning even clearer. If you do not engage on why you are making such changes, and continue to do so after this warning, you will be blocked from editing. -- KTC (talk) 15:58, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for making this edit, changing the updated date without changing the content despite multiple previous warnings not to do this. If you wish to be unblocked sooner then you must explain your reasoning for your edits on this page and/or commit to stop making such edits. If, after the block expires, you return to the same behaviour you will be blocked again for a longer duration. Thryduulf (talk) 21:45, 15 July 2018 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.Reply
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martha Harris (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fullback (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Belgian Women's First Division, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Melle, Aalst and Mol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rosella Ayane

edit

Hi Mathewscott1983, I've reverted your edits on the Rosella Ayane article as you didn't add a reliable source. Please add a RS in future edits. Thanks. R96Skinner (talk) 12:19, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plymouth Raiders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nottingham Wildcats moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Nottingham Wildcats, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. New articles generally need at least two (but preferably more) references from reliable sources that are independent of the subject that discuss the subject with significant coverage (trivial mentions do not contribute to notability).(See Rule 42) Information that can't be referenced to reliable sources should be removed from the draft because verifiability is necessary for information added to Wikipedia.
I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on the article with minimal disruption from other users while you improve it.
When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready to be published, you can move it back to the article space yourself. However, I recommend that instead of moving it yourself that you follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template that I have added to the page. This submits the article to be reviewed by experienced editors that specialize in helping new editors write their first articles. Edaham (talk) 11:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Oaklands Wolves

edit

Hi, I'm Dan Koehl. Mathewscott1983, thanks for creating Oaklands Wolves!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please verify with valid sources, and categorize

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Dan Koehl (talk) 17:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Mathewscott1983. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Brianna Visalli

edit
 

Hello, Mathewscott1983. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brianna Visalli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Nottingham Wildcats

edit
 

Hello, Mathewscott1983. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nottingham Wildcats".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply