Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhesad Mata Mandir (December 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Dan arndt (talk) 06:45, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mannuseemu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:45, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hi Mannuseemu! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Zerbu Talk 16:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks 🙏 Mannuseemu (talk) 17:25, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khejarla Fort (December 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 08:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhesad Mata Mandir (December 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 23:40, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Paota Bus Stand (Jodhpur) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Paota Bus Stand (Jodhpur), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 20:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Villages in Bilara Tehsil, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lamba and Nanan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Paota Bus Stand (Jodhpur) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paota Bus Stand (Jodhpur) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paota Bus Stand (Jodhpur) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Can i know the reason for deletion Mannuseemu (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Love You Mahri Jaan moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Love You Mahri Jaan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Love You Mahri Jaan, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Rajasthani-language films, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of Rajasthani-language films, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 16:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Khejarla Toll Plaza

edit
 

The article Khejarla Toll Plaza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find any examples of significant, detailed coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:14, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reference has been made after clear analysis of link. Mannuseemu (talk) 09:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Khejarla Toll Plaza for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khejarla Toll Plaza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khejarla Toll Plaza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ok Mannuseemu (talk) 02:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:MahendraPrajapatKhejarla per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MahendraPrajapatKhejarla. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 08:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Love You Mahri Jaan moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Love You Mahri Jaan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 15:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Rural area in Rajasthan has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Rural area in Rajasthan has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 03:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Bearcat this category contains all of the village who comes under matwar in Rajasthan. Mannuseemu (talk) 03:53, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply