Wannabe Wiki (talk) 10:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)hI jACK FROM aXDRIAN Wannabe Wiki (talk) 00:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

DID YOU DO VIKING HOMEWORK —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wannabe Wiki (talkcontribs) 00:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey Jack, Welcome to Wikipedia (and you called me a geek) this might help you out.211.30.0.121 (talk) 01:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Hello, Magically Clever! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Big Deal edit

I have contributed to hundred of pages you 'sped' and the flying spaghetti monster is nothing compared to her holiness the invisible pink unicorn.Wannabe Wiki (talk) 02:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have edited 100+ pages thank you very much but no i have never actually created a page, ALL HAIL THE IVP.:)Wannabe Wiki (talk) 07:02, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey Jack, for parent teacher interviews do we wear our uniform or casual clothing and did you find out what the song was? randomn. Wannabe Wiki (talk) 07:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Liar! you didn't create the Paul Neil Milne Johnstone page at all, you're full of !@#$%^, by the way thanks for the SONG I knw it was Whitney Houston, you spellt apparently wrong you moron, the invisible pink unicorn is the true goddess not that weird spaghetti guy and I know how to hyper link so ha ha. Wannabe Wiki (talk) 08:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Let's refrain from name calling, Wannabe Wiki, please... thank you :) Midorihana みどりはな 08:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Magically Clever, also see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles - none of here at Wikipedia have our 'own' articles. Just a heads up. Midorihana みどりはな 08:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ha, ha jack you got in trouble from midorihana, by the way I reverted what you did to my usepage and I am considering reporting you to administrator:), and my God that article you created is terrible (NOTE: THIS IS CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICSM).211.30.6.179 (talk) 09:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, no - he didn't get in trouble, it was just a notice about things. Midorihana みどりはな 02:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

To get your page back to normal all you got to do is go to history and press undo to my edit, you still only learning about Wikipedia my friend.Wannabe Wiki (talk) 06:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Happy Birthday edit

Have a wonderful bithday, tomorrow at school I am going to give you your birthday punches ha, ha, ha. IVP RULES. Wannabe Wiki (talk) 08:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)  Reply

I created my first article The Karls so ha,ha the info is from that handout from Ronchetti.:)Wannabe Wiki (talk) 08:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

To send me a cookie, write Subst:Cookie in side these 4 brackets {{}} to send me a smile, write Subst:Cookie in side these 4 brackets {{}} now you have no excuse, you better send me a message by the way my article is not a stub yours is.211.30.119.211 (talk) 07:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh my God you were right....... (In early December 1891, Dr. James Naismith,[1] a Canadian physical education student and instructor at YMCA Training School[2] (today, Springfield College) in Springfield, Massachusetts, USA, sought a vigorous indoor game to keep his students occupied and at proper levels of fitness during the long New England winters to keep the students in shape. After rejecting other ideas as either too rough or poorly suited to walled-in gymnasiums, he wrote the basic rules and nailed a peach basket onto a 10-foot (3.05 m) elevated track.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wannabe Wiki (talkcontribs) 08:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ha,ha,ha Midorhana didn't send you happy birthday, i can't believe you were right, thanks for the cookie and why do you always go on wikipedia so late. :) Wannabe Wiki (talk) 09:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC). :)Reply

Ehhh, I don't know you in RL, so I wouldn't know when your birthday is. But Happy Birthday. :) Midorihana みどりはな 01:37, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
LOL. :) Midorihana みどりはな 07:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

what are you talking about, what don't i believe about, whats pleasing?

My God, you are such a kiss arse and sign your comments God dammnit, it's wiki ettiquette. :) Wannabe Wiki (talk) 10:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks for your editor review!

Also, (late) happy birthday, here's some cake:

 

If you need any help about anything at all, feel free to write on my talk page. :) Midorihana みどりはな 01:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge discussion edit

Why did you remove the merge discussion from the page? Just wondering. Midorihana みどりはな 01:45, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Could you please respond? Thanks! Midorihana みどりはな 04:11, 24 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
No problem, thanks for replying. I felt that the merge would work in that case because there was an entry at the other page (Minor_characters_from_The_Hitchhiker's_Guide_to_the_Galaxy#Paula_Nancy_Millstone_Jennings_of_Sussex) and that the information at your page could fix there as well. Sometimes, we do have to merge things and part with articles, but everything is in the interest of Wikipedia. :) What happens during a merge is that the information in an article is combined with an article of the same topic, and the old page is redirected. Nothing is 'destroyed'; you can continue to work on the other page, and the same information will be there. Would it be alright if I put the merge template back on again for discussion?
Also, when you're editing and making a change which may require explanation (such as removing a merge template), it's a good idea to use edit summaries. :)

Happy editing, Midorihana みどりはな 19:09, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Alright. If you're concerned about loss of information while merging, you can go ahead and help too if the consensus is to merge. Midorihana みどりはな 07:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
P.S. - see WP:MERGE too for more info on merging. :) Midorihana みどりはな 07:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, my new wiki cake however is much better and I will also send you a cookie so ha,ha

Wannabe Wiki (talk) 07:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

NOOOOOO! edit

Someone deleted my The Karls article and replaced it with the churls, whats up with that, I know it was bad but not that bad. :( DepressionWannabe Wiki (talk) 07:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

ha. ha. ha edit

You lost, your a terrible debater. you're out of the comp, did andrea win and did depalo stufff up and whats wrong with my wiki cake. And i'm right about the song "Turning Japanese" is the most popular song released by The Vapors off their album New Clear Days and the song they are most known for. The song's lyrics mainly consist of the singer talking about the picture of his love. the song euphemistically refer to masturbation, Wannabe Wiki (talk) 13:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, I'm right it is about you know what. by the way what is with you and antiamericanism —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wannabe Wiki (talkcontribs) 01:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Liar edit

I searched the lyrics to 'who are you' and there is no fuck in there you liar, but you were actually right about the ABBA song. BTW I went on the burma discussion and put 'for' Burma too. Wannabe Wiki (talk) 09:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, you;re wrong, and sign your comments.Wannabe Wiki (talk) 10:29, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Reply, I'm bored.Wannabe Wiki (talk) 08:05, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I already know Waterloo, you get userboxes from Wikipedia:UserboxesWannabe Wiki (talk) 09:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

hey jack its depalo i made my page its not very good but go have a look anyway and tell fletcher too (The Fat Man93 (talk) 07:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC))Reply

AVOID THE NOID.:), REPLY I AM LONELY.Wannabe Wiki (talk) 09:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Totemism - in Australian Aboriginal religion edit

Thanks for your recent edit to Australian Aboriginal mythology adding reference to totemism (and for so drawing attention to the need for this article to cover totemism in Aboriginal Australia.)

I am, however, a little concerned at how accurate your edit is, and I'm not certain the reference you've used is the most authoritative or reliable of those we should be able to find.

From experience, trying to remember off the top of my head : - while it is true that the term 'totem' was first borrowed from the Americas, then later applied to Australian Aborigines .. I think the form it took/takes in Australia is substantially different to the American (?) form you describe.

As I understand it, in Australia if you imagine family, relationships and obligations as extending outwards and including the non-human world .. then:

1. the whole world is made up of places, waters, clouds, features, flora and fauna with whom one is closely related .. and those who are other people's close relations

2. the whole world consists of 'classes' of places, waters, clouds, features etc .. and one's obligations, responsibilities and rights are in part predetermined by the object, place, plant or animals 'class'

3. there are some 'classes' from whom one is expected, even required to 'marry' into etc .. and their are other classes which one is prohibited from marryin into etc ... (see for instance Lardil kinship totems)

Whatever the actual case may be .. I am pretty certain, Aboriginal totemism is more complex than your edit currently suggests.

On the above grounds, if it's OK with you, I'd like to cut and past your current edit into the article's talk page .. until we have done a bit more detailed research .. possibly to create a new section specifically on totemism?!! Bruceanthro (talk) 13:50, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

ANI Thread edit

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Edit_War_on_God<3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 08:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

ANI Thread edit

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Edit_War_on_God<3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 08:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lets hope we see no more repeats of your appalling outburst today. How would you feel if people persistently vandalised your user page merely in order to attack you. Please desist from vandalising other users user pages to attack them because you don't like them. Thanks, SqueakBox 00:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

What is he talking about? also see Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars under user pages, jimmy wales part 2.Wannabe Wiki (talk) 08:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I was Rignt edit

In the 1920s, Italian Fascism, adapting aesthetic elements of ancient Rome, attempted to portray itself as a revival of its Roman imperial past by adopting the fasces for its symbol, as an emblem of the increased strength of the individual fascis when bound into the entire bundle.  

help edit

support me on the edit war. :)Wannabe Wiki (talk) 08:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

This account has been blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Wannabe Wiki who has been proven to be a sockpuppet of banned user User:Adrian Fletcher. To appeal this block, do so through User:Adrian Fletcher and directly to the arbitration committee.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blocked Unfairly edit

I am not a sock puppet of Wannabe Wiki, and never will be. I am my own person, and if you would examine the comments on Wannabe Wiki's page, im sure that you will realise that the block is a mistake, as most comments would be absurd if sent to ones self. Magically Clever (talk) 06:38, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Magically Clever (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
122.106.39.177 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Magically Clever". The reason given for Magically Clever's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: User:Adrian Fletcher by m


Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Woody (talk) 11:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Magically Clever (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The reason I was blocked was that I am apparantly a sock puppet of User:Adrian Fletcher. This is incorrect. I am simply a friend and am in correspondence with him through his User Wannabe Wiki page. Please unblock me, as the reason for blocking me is false and I am not a sock puppet of User: Adran Fletcher.

Decline reason:

As noted above, please contact the arbitration committee if you wish to be unblocked. — ➨ ЯEDVEЯS used to be a sweet boy 11:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Magically Clever (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have not done anything wrong. I have been blocked due to the accusation that I am a sock puppet of User:Adrian Fletcher and User:Wannabe Wiki. This is incorrect. I do not know how to prove this, but if you would review my record and compare it against these other users who are apparantly controlling me, then I'm sure you will see that a mistake has been made. In accordance with previous declines of this unblock template, I have visited the Arbitration page and was going to enter my case, but due to the blocking, I was unable to enter a case through editing the page. Please, if you do decline, tell me how to appeal the blok so that my account can be unblocked.

Decline reason:

No admin here is going to unblock you on their own when this involves an ArbCom decision. Email a member of the committee. This has been explained to you above. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

I believe that Magically Clever is innocent edit

Do a check user i don't think he is a sock puppetTHROUGH?AWIKI?DARKLY (talk) 06:55, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Magically Clever (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
122.106.39.177 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusing multiple accounts: User:Adrian Fletcher by connection with User:Wannabe Wiki


Decline reason: This is not an autoblock. Also, it has been suggested above that rather than continuing to use unblock request templates, you instead should proceed by contacting the Arbitration Committee via email so they can look into the matter. — —Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 06:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I cannot stress enough what an astronomically bad idea it is to request unblock from sockpuppetry with a sockpuppet. The Evil Spartan (talk) 06:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply