User talk:Morogris/Archive 6

(Redirected from User talk:MX/Archive 6)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Gerda Arendt in topic Precious again

DYK for Murder of Octavio Rojas Hernández

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for 2011 Matamoros mass kidnapping

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Benjamín Galván Gómez

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Benjamín Galván Gómez you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 06:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Benjamín Galván Gómez

The article Benjamín Galván Gómez you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Benjamín Galván Gómez for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 20:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

You may wish to comment

I have listed you as the updater for the 2014 Iguala mass kidnapping at In The News. You may wish to comment there. μηδείς (talk) 17:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Thank you very much, μηδείς. I was only planning to nominate the article if the students were found (alive or dead), but seeing how the international press has picked up the story, I think it is a good idea to do it now too. Do you think the article can be nominated again if the status of the students is confirmed? ComputerJA () 18:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Some crimes are never nominated, and some only after conviction and sentencing. Given that the pair were fugitives and the nature of the crime I think now is the best chance at posting. If bodies are identified soon then we would just update the blurb. If they are identified in two weeks a second nomination would be unlikely. There is no policy, it depends on news coverage and the mood of he desk. If the bodies are found years from now then another nomination might work. You might compare the nomination history of Oscar Pistorius who was only listed after he was convicted. But he was not a fugitive, and many Mexican fugitives have been posted before. μηδείς (talk) 18:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your reply, μηδείς. I have high hopes and think that the story will make it to ITN if the students' status are confirmed. Thanks again for nominating. ComputerJA () 21:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Iguala mass kidnapping, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Informador. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

ITN credit

ThaddeusB (talk) 21:52, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Ayotzinapa

Te dejé un par de mensajes con fuentes que puedes utilizar para ampliar el artículo. Aquí puedes ver una entrevista a la periodista Anabel Hernández, se trata de los resultados de "un trabajo realizado con el apoyo del Programa de Periodismo de Investigación de la Universidad de California en Berkeley con base en testimonios, videos, informes inéditos y declaraciones judiciales muestra que la Policía Federal (PF) participó activa y directamente en el atentado". Esta noticia indica que "policías federales y militares participaron en el ataque a normalistas". El reportaje salió el sábado pasado en la revista Proceso. Saludos. Jaontiveros (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your comment about the El Cielo Biosphere article I created. Smallchief (talk 10:36, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

The Fight to Save Juárez

Thanks for helping the article!

Are you interested in starting a Spanish version of The Fight to Save Juárez? I have written articles on Latin America-related books, and they have been translated into Spanish by other Wikipedians: The Japanese in Latin America and New Worlds, New Lives.

Also, are you interested in expanding Spanish-language articles about Texas politics such as es:Departamento de Justicia Criminal de Texas? (from Texas Department of Criminal Justice), or creating new ones about Texas culture such as Paño? WhisperToMe (talk) 04:56, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

  • @WhisperToMe: Thank you for creating the article! I haven't read the book myself but I have free access to it at my school's library catalog. Hopefully I can read it once I finish the ones I checked out for the winter break already. :-)
In all honesty, I'll have to decline your request for now. I am not very active on Spanish Wikipedia because I've grown in disappointment with other editors there. I've encountered many differences with some of them, especially regarding citations (not to mention the fact that some have accused me of working for the government and being a deletionist—when, in fact, I delete information after I research it and see that there are no sources backing what it states). Anyhow, when I get a hold of the book and finish it, I'll consider expanding the article and creating one in Spanish too. It's on my Watchlist for now on, though. Thanks for stopping by, happy holidays! ComputerJA () 17:53, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
You're welcome! Happy holidays too! WhisperToMe (talk) 23:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Precious again

Mexico
Thank you for quality articles on the Mexican drug war, such as María Santos Gorrostieta Salazar and Manuel Buendía, "vital to inform the English-language world", for reviewing and fighting unsourced trivia, for an informative user page, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 705th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 705 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2011 Matamoros mass kidnapping, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

1967 Opium War

Hello,

I saw your expressed interest in drug wars on your User page, and thought the above might be of interest to you.

Georgejdorner (talk) 04:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Georgejdorner: Great job on the article! I don't know much about that event, but I added it to my watchlist since it is certainly related to my field of work. Thanks for stopping by. ComputerJA () 19:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
    • Actually, I was subtly giving you the first opportunity to review it for DYK.....Georgejdorner (talk) 03:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kidnapping of Moisés Sánchez Cerezo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Secretary of Interior and Miguel Ángel Osorio. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Edit Request for Angelica Fuentes Wikipedia Page

Hi, I saw you had an interest in all things related to Mexico, and wanted to see if you could look over an edit request I've put on the Angelica Fuentes English Wikipedia page. It's an extensive edit, but includes information about her influence in Mexico and regional and global philanthropy. Hope you can consider it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cvillasmil (talkcontribs) 18:58, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

vandalising the Mexican Drug War

Hi, i've been noticing some users vandalising the main article of the Mexican Drug War (since the first days february).

I think you might like to give it a look.

Also, congrats for the great work on the Mexico related articles.

  • Hey, thanks for visiting my talkpage. I saw the history log of the article. I think you're right about the neutrality box; you guys should settle your differences on the talkpage and see what can be done. I've been pretty lazy with the Mexican Drug War article, so thank you for keeping an eye on it. I'll be around and supervising the discussion if you guys are down for it. Thanks, ComputerJA () 19:30, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

re Mexican Drug

I have absolutely no special interest in the Mexican Drug War and simply stumbled upon it by accident. But the edits in question are clear in violation or WP:OR. Your assertion that he provided sources is irrelevant. From WP:OR: This includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding OR, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented. (This policy of no original research does not apply to talk pages.)

CJK (talk) 20:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

  • I see bias in your edit, (and many other articles you edit), i think you are doing it more in a pro-American stand, than in an attempt to improve wikipedia's reliability.
  • I´m adding Controversial facts under the controversy section.

No one "implies a conclusion". The information is relevant, it points to reliable sources and news articles, please read the references.

  • Also read this articles (and its references):

CIA drug trafficking

Gulf Cartel#Corruption_in_the_United_States

Guadalajara Cartel#Collaboration_with_the_CIA_and_DFS

ATF gunwalking scandal

  • The direct or indirect support of Mexican and U.S. officials to Drug Cartels is relevant. The fact is controversial? Yes, but it's not an "original research", the articles an references are there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.160.141.229 (talk) 15:11, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

You seem not to have looked closely at my edits, I have been quite critical of certain aspects my country's actions in articles related to both World War II and the American Revolution. The problem is that your assertion The direct or indirect support of Mexican and U.S. officials to Drug Cartels is relevant is purely original research on your part and most of your source actually predate the war! WP:OR clearly states that users cannot use facts A or B to support conclusion C. You would need a reliable source related to the war in question that explicitly states that U.S. is deliberately supporting the drug cartels in question.

CJK (talk) 23:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DragonBallZ-BattleofGods-poster.jpeg

 

Thanks for uploading File:DragonBallZ-BattleofGods-poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Invitation

 
Thank you for using VisualEditor and sharing your ideas with the developers.

Hello, ComputerJA,

The Editing team is asking very experienced editors like you for your help with VisualEditor. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Child Soldiers in the Mexican Drug War

I think you might be interested in this documentary since you work on the subject.--Catlemur (talk) 13:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

  • @Catlemur: Hey, thank you very much for bringing this to my attention! I'm going to start watching it right now. ComputerJA () 20:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Kidnapping and murder of Moisés Sánchez Cerezo

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi!

Hi ComputerJa! Sorry If I answer you late, thanks for your advices, I'm italian and was the first time that edit a page in a english Wikipedia, If I'm wrong correct me freely! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alainbo (talkcontribs) 18:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Metro 4 listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Metro 4. Since you had some involvement with the Metro 4 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Gracias

Thank you for advising me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vicboy (talkcontribs) 08:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Cain Velasquez

While Cain is a very proud Mexican man, his heritage is not relative to his notability. His notability is being one of the best mixed martial artists in the world where nationality is relevant, not ethnicity. I will be removing it once again. You also might want to read the very first sentence, they "should not generally be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. --Rockchalk717 14:44, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HeribertoLazcano-mugshot.png

 

Thanks for uploading File:HeribertoLazcano-mugshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of journalists killed in Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miahuatlán. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Wayback

Hi, ComputerJA. Regarding this edit, I'm having trouble figuring out how you found the Wayback link. When I put this link in the search window at the top, I get this result. Do you know if I need to sign in to use archive.org? Thanks! - Location (talk) 15:26, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

  • @Location: Hello. You don't need to sign in. You're doing everything right so far. After getting the result that you got, click on any of the dates when the link was archived. In 2013, for example, the link was archived in June 15. If you click that you'll get a live view of the page on that exact date (however, the link was already dead when that person archived it). What I always do is go back a few more years. If you click in 2001 (see here), go to June 20 or any other date with the circle and click it. The link should be there. You can check the source in other years too. Let me know if you did not understand or need more help! ComputerJA ()
Got it! It makes sense now. Thanks for the help! - Location (talk) 07:33, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
  • @Location: Awesome, I'm glad I was of help. WayBack Machine is very useful when researching; I tend to archive sources myself all the time. You'll be surprised how many times a link goes dead months later. Archiving sources that you like/want is a good habit. Not all sources can be archived there, so I also use WebCite. If you ever come across that page and have some questions, let me know! See you around. ComputerJA () 20:26, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Cheers! - Location (talk) 20:29, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited André-Pierre Gignac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Plate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

A beer for you!

  Back on after a 2-year wikibreak and glad to see you're still around doing great work. Thanks for fighting the good fight for so long... -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Khazar2: Hey!!! It's been 2 years? Wow, time flies... I'm happy to see you back! Thanks for reaching out. BTW, I haven't been as active this year as I would've wanted because work has kept me very busy, but hopefully I can start strong again soon. ComputerJA () 05:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Talk:UFC 194

Nice job on working on the content. Someone else is trying to remove your additions, but the removal has been reverted. Comment at above talk page. --George Ho (talk) 17:16, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

  • @George Ho: Thank you, George. Feel free to correct the prose if you think any changes are needed. English is not my first language so I am not sure if I used appropriate fighting terminology. Cheers! ComputerJA () 15:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Jaoquin El Chapo Guzmán

Hello JA I was wondering if you can revert El Chapo Guzman's article back to Joaquín Guzmán Lorea. he is referred by his full name by Pena Nieto and most links have him listed this way. I do not know why someone reverted it. it was better the way it was in my humble opinion. Thank you. --Sc30002001 (talk) 21:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

  • @Sc30002001: The reason why the government doesn't refer to El Chapo by his nickname is because they do not want to glorify criminals. ALL media outlets literally refer to him as Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán or at least mention his nickname, expect for government sources. I believe his alias should be included. If you compare the results in Google, the one with his alias has more than the one you suggested. I don't think a title move requires a discussion when this is clearly a no-brainer. ComputerJA () 15:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ElChapo-Isidro.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:ElChapo-Isidro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Elie Wiesel

Inadvertent. Sorry. Sca (talk) 21:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ElChapo-Isidro.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:ElChapo-Isidro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ComputerJA. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)