Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 10:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Also unsourced
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:MP Mau5/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello! MP Mau5,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Organizational notability requires substantial coverage by independent reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iota Tau Kappa (ITK) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Iota Tau Kappa (ITK), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please do not create multiple copies of drafts. There is already a copy of this draft.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:MP Mau5/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was:
1. Multiple references cited are not verifying the subject/topic. 2. Please maintain WP:NPOV in section Black List 3. Remove overreference on www.oneontaathletics.com , and find suitable WP:SECONDARY citations.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iota Tau Kappa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I'm Naraht and I'm an experienced editor and someone who works on pages about Greek Letter Organizations a lot. I thought that I'd comment on your draft Draft:Iota Tau Kappa. There are a couple of issues here. First, the "black list"/"blacklist" , most of the references in that section are about the blacklist, not about Iota Tau Kappa. If there was an article about the black list or the movie "Brothers of the Blacklist" (probably the first, with the second being heavily mentioned in it and perhaps split off), then most of that section would be removed and then it would be referenced. Secondly, the references to the individual brothers sow that they are brothers, but don't show anything about the notability of Iota Tau Kappa. When I google "Iota Tau Kappa" "Oneonta" I get about 5 pages of hits, none of which are *about* Iota Tau Kappa. There are mentions of the fraternity certainly, but https://thestatetimes.com/2011/10/30/contentwhy-rush/ is the one that is closest to being about ITK.Naraht (talk) 10:26, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Naraht was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
The comment the reviewer left was:
The additions are about individual people or the blacklist. None of them are about why Iota Tau Kappa is notable, in fact most of the references don't even mention Iota Tau Kappa. I've left a note on the primary draftee's page and would be happy to work with him there as well.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iota Tau Kappa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Naraht was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Neither of these changes help with showing Iota Tau Kappa's notability. Local newspapers for Oneonta or articles in the School Newspaper would be a good start
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iota Tau Kappa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
File:1992 ITK Composite.jpg listed for discussionedit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1992 ITK Composite.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:57, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
