LuisaDG
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
LuisaDG, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi LuisaDG! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:32, 12 May 2015 (UTC) |
DRN Declined edit
I have declined your dispute resolution noticeboard thread as not being in the scope of that noticeboard, because it is not a dispute about a specific article. Please read the Wikipedia spam guidelines. If you still think that adding the link to multiple articles is appropriate, you may discuss whether it is appropriate at the external links noticeboard. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:25, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Forum-shopping edit
I see you have raised the same issue at multiple venues:
- User talk:Ohnoitsjamie
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard
- Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard
- and now at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine
Please understand that Wikipedia has a policy against forum-shopping, and that you cannot expect to keep trying different venues in the hope that one will give the answer you want. Editors who engage in tendentious editing may become subject to restrictions on their ability to edit here. --RexxS (talk) 15:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)