Welcome! edit

Hi Lorinmh! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Mr.weedle (talk) 05:12, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of David Woods (safety researcher) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Woods (safety researcher), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

General advice continued from discussion on the talk page... The best way of developing biographies is to find at least two, and preferably three, reliable independent sources that discuss the subject or their works/research in depth. For deceased subjects this is usually obituaries, but it is much less easy for living subjects. Festschrifts on retirement are a possibility, as are academic society biographies of past-presidents, or bios associated with major awards. Book reviews can also be helpful. Then you construct the bulk of the article according to what the sources say. Once you've done that, it is acceptable to flesh out basic education and career milestones with the subject's CV or similar. What you absolutely cannot do is support statements like "pioneered x" "is a leader in y", "discovered z" or the like based on the subject's own papers. Hope this is helpful and good luck! Espresso Addict (talk) 01:18, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Practical drift moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Practical drift, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~StyyxTalk? 20:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 25 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jens Rasmussen (human factors expert), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Woods and Richard Cook. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drift (safety) (January 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Kvng (talk) 03:44, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Lorinmh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Kvng (talk) 03:44, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan D. Swain has been accepted edit

 
Alan D. Swain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 23:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Practical drift edit

  Hello, Lorinmh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Practical drift, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Disturbance management edit

  Hello, Lorinmh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Disturbance management, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Clambake conferences edit

  Hello, Lorinmh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clambake conferences, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Practical drift edit

 

Hello, Lorinmh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Practical drift".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Disturbance management edit

 

Hello, Lorinmh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Disturbance management".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Clambake conferences edit

 

Hello, Lorinmh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clambake conferences".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Drift (safety) edit

  Hello, Lorinmh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Drift (safety), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply