Your submission at Articles for creation: Raine Study (September 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
» Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 08:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! LoreleiCampbell, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 08:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raine Study (October 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 15:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

 

Hello, LoreleiCampbell, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. North America1000 22:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

Writing articles
The community
Miscellaneous

Declare any connection edit

 

Hello LoreleiCampbell. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Raine Study, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LoreleiCampbell. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=LoreleiCampbell|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Bruce, I am employed part-time with the Raine Study, so yes you are correct. I need to declare that. The Raine Study however is definitely a worthy wikipedia listing and would not have done this otherwise. I had thought I had posted it as a potential article for creation, not submitted directly so will review what I have done. Thank you though for pointing that out.

How can I suggest an article for creation? edit

Hoping someone can help me by telling me how I can suggest an article for creation like the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Raine_Study

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raine Study has been accepted edit

 
Raine Study, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kerry (talk) 22:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply