LeticiaLL
Chloroform - thanks edit
Hi LeticiaLL, thanks for catching the error in the article. I traced down a dubious edit and restored the lead to what was previously. S0091 (talk) 10:57, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Welcome LeticiaLL!
I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
CH2I2 edit
CH2I2 edit
Its colorless. Impure samples often appear colored, but CH2I2. C2F4 is stable. It does tend to polymerize, but the C2F4 is a very happy molecule. The language describing compounds can be precise in ways that are not immediately obvious. --Smokefoot (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Are you American? LeticiaLL (talk) 13:13, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
1,1,1-Trichloroacetone edit
Congratulations on making your first article: 1,1,1-Trichloroacetone. I have added to the chembox, added a project to the talk page, linked it from Wikidata, and made a lower case redirect. Do you have some extra knowledge on C2F2? Hhas it been made as a liquid or solid? (I am making list of gases which would include this if it was stable and a gas.) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:23, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
If difluoroacetylene was stable, it would be a gas LeticiaLL (talk) 11:51, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
National varieties of English edit
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Styrene, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 11:10, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
I wrote the sentence there. It was colourless when I wrote there. LeticiaLL (talk) 11:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'm talking about this edit involving polymerize/polymerise. The styrene article has been consistently US-English since many years before your account existed. The standard is that each article should be self-consistent (see the guideline I linked above). It doesn't matter who writes each sentence in it. But each article's standard is set when the article is created. So 1,1,1-Trichloroacetone (thanks for creating it!) will consistently use the UK spellings because that's how it started, no matter who adds to it. DMacks (talk) 11:46, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
I did not know that. Thanks for informing me LeticiaLL (talk) 11:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Chloromethanol moved to draftspace edit
An article you recently created, Chloromethanol, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 23 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doubts Even Here, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Morris. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
November 2020 edit
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Praxidicae (talk) 18:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
WP:Edit warring edit
Read WP:Edit warring. If you continue to edit war over the Bisexuality and Pansexuality articles, you will be reported and very likely WP:Blocked. We follow what the literature states with WP:Due weight. There is more than one definition of bisexuality. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 23:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Bisexuality is attraction REGARDLESS of gender and sex. It will always be that way. I also edit chemistry pages, why are you threatening me with blocking? LeticiaLL (talk) 23:35, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- You state that, and yet sources give different definitions. They also define pansexuality the same exact way that you are defining bisexuality. This 2015 "Sexuality Now: Embracing Diversity" source, from Cengage Learning, states, "Pansexuality is also sometimes included under the definition of bisexuality, since pansexuality rejects the gender binary and encompasses romantic or sexual attractions to all gender identities." How do you reconcile that? Do you see bisexuality and pansexuality as different or the same? Regardless of what you think, we go by what the literature states, not what a single editor states. I don't see what you editing chemistry pages has to do with this. The above post by me is not a threat; it's a warning. And I warned you because you are being disruptive. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 23:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- I got my answer here about whether you consider the two to be the same. That is your personal opinion. Others disagree, despite one definition for bisexuality being "regardless of gender." Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 23:48, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
"others disagree"? Who? Other bisexuals agree with the gender blindness of bisexuality. I won't argue with such a person like you. You're literally threatening me. Don't ever write me again. LeticiaLL (talk) 00:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Chloromethanol edit
Hello, LeticiaLL. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chloromethanol, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
The article Zdeněk Adamec (Czech student) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While incredibly insane, clearly a case of WP:BIO1E.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 15:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
DS alert edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
You have used the term Terrorist for Abdullah Öcalan whiteout a proper intextattribution which is against WP:TERRORIST and maybe also against the Ruling of the ArbCom Case about Kurds and Kurdistan which includes General Sanctions as well as Standard Discretionary Sanctions about which you therefore have been notified. I suggest you adapt these edits, if not, I will.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - wolf 17:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)}}
Edit warring at List of political self-immolations edit
Hello User:LeticiaLL. You've been warned for edit warring per a complaint at the noticeboard. You are risking a block if you revert the article again without first getting a consensus in your favor on the article talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- That was not a threat. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 00:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Chloromethanol edit
Hello, LeticiaLL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chloromethanol".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! The Sokks💕 (talk) 23:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Accuracy and Objectiveness edit
As funny as what you had edited the page Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to be, an encyclopaedia must be neutral and objective, so I have reverted the edits made. Be aware if you continue it will down to admins to deal with. An encyclopaedia is used by everyone for objective and accurate information and making jokes does not fall under this. Haroony213 (talk) 00:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
April 2022 edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
How? LeticiaLL (talk) 00:21, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
LeticiaLL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 00:39, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.