Welcome! edit

Hello, LesleyGreer, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

January 2018 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Mayday Parade has been reverted.
Your edit here to Mayday Parade was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/maydayparade) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A goat for you! edit

 

hello!

Greener.do (talk) 11:49, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

A cup of coffee for you! edit

  Editing over coffee :) Nhd1 (talk) 11:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Marion Grieve edit

Hello, LesleyGreer,

Thanks for creating Marion Grieve! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on Marion Grieve, though I recommend more text on what made her notable in suffragette history, besides a basic notice that she was a member of that movement.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red edit

Hi there, LesleyGreer. I'm happy to see you have tagged your user page with the WIR box but you are not yet listed as a member of the project. You can become an "official" member by registering on the main Women in Red page. Thanks also for creating Marion Grieve and Marjorie Ritchie. I hope there will be many more. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:55, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for registering and welcome to the project as an official member. You might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

A cookie for you! edit

  Thanks for suggesting this! Dgeorge2 (talk) 12:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

A goat for you! edit

 

Please enjoy this delightful goat!

LornaMCampbell (talk) 12:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Beata Nowok edit

 

The article Beata Nowok has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Beata Nowok for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beata Nowok is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beata Nowok until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you! edit

 

thanks and best wishes for todays editathon

Kaybeesquared (talk) 12:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ada Lovelace Day edit

  Women in STEM award
Thanks for editing Wikipedia today! Stinglehammer (talk) 13:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Nice to meet you today! Happylemonbanana (talk) 13:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ada Lovelace edit

 

hiii

BingoLeah (talk) 13:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

International Women's Day 2024 edit

  IWD award
Thanks for joining us and helping make the internet a little less sexist today! Have you seen Marion Grieve in our updated Women's Suffrage in Scotland timeline btw? https://js.histropedia.com/projects/vote100-edinburgh-uni/ Stinglehammer (talk) 17:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
this is ace that Marion is on the timeline! LesleyGreer (talk) 20:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply