Re: Hello, Professor.

edit

Good job finishing the assignment and leaving me a message on my talk page. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

re: Hello, Professor. again!!!

edit

Once is enough as long as you mention you are taking both courses. But more edits = more practice = good :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Lee Se Hyun! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:09, Sunday, April 5, 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Lee Se Hyun! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 06:55, Monday, April 13, 2020 (UTC)

Please add your name to our class spreadsheet

edit

See announcement from last week ago on the Courseweb ([1]). Thank you, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

PS. Since you take both CI and SD classes, please add your name to both tabs in the spredsheet. Thank you, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:54, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Weekly 10 edits

edit

Please make sure to make your weekly 10 edits for the Collective Intelligence class. As a reminder, if you miss your weekly edits, your score will be lowered by 1 point. But don't worry, you can easily get extra points by making extra edits for extra credit (each 10 extra edits will add another point to your score on average). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please add your main topic(s) to our dashbroad

edit

Here and Here. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Review of User:Lee Se Hyun/sandbox

edit

First, please complete the assignments requiring you to add your name and topic to our spreadsheet and the outreach wiki.

Second. I see you have chosen the topic of a guard posts in the DMZ. It is a notable topic, good choice. But the article will need a number of fixes:

  • please make sure each sentence has an inline reference (footnote) that is properly formatted. (See our videos on how to add and format references). For your current references, please make sure to add the source date, author, and the English translation of the title (don't remove the Korean title, just add the translation in the separate field)
  • Please add blue links (hyperlinks); see WP:BTW.
  • Please add an introduction/lead/abstract (see WP:LEAD).
  • Please add the source of the images you uploaded to their pages. Please note that we cannot copy (steal) images from the Internet unless they are freely copyrighted. Images you add to the article should come from Wikimedia Commons, or be otherwise free (for example, you can upload your own photographs).

Please let me know when you update your draft.

PS. Please let me know if you want this assignment credited for Collective Intelligence or Social Development, and please let me know your other topic for the other class ASAP. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your explanation. Please see WP:V and WP:OR. We cannot reference content to our personal knowledge or experience, we have to reference it to books, newspapers, journals or websites. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Seoul Fashion Week

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Seoul Fashion Week, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JavaHurricane 14:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Lee Se Hyun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Infoboxes

edit

For Bogyeom, please try to add an infobox from Wikipedia:List of infoboxes. It will look much better.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:13, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Lee Jae-myung

edit

Please move your footnotes to the correct places in the article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Reply

edit

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. If you post an article it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft. I deleted your article because

  • it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the event or an affiliated organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. You gave some references, but they were to the organisation itself, blogs and YouTube, not a single independent third-party source
  • There are no verifiable facts amongst the promo that helps to show notability, such as attendance, number of staff, income or expenditure
  • it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: one of the world's top five fashion week... Anyone who visits DDP during Fashion Week can enjoy it... visitors can enjoy them...With a unique perspective and fresh ideas... the gateway to the next generation of designers. and so on, relentless promo throughout. You even have sections like "How to Participate" "There's nothing to worry about even if you haven't seen the photo time". This is supposed to be an encyclopaedia article, not a brochure for the festival
  • there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to affiliated sites. It reads as if it's produced by a paid editor, even though I realise you are not.
  • You said I think we can ask them to correct the problem. Who is "them"?

On my talk page you sounded aggrieved about the deletion without discussion, but your text, posted as an article, not a draft, was totally non-compliant. I don't know what guidance, if any, you have been given, but your article had no real facts, no proper independent third-party sources and buckets of opinions and promo.

Piotrus, as you know, we often restore deleted text on request, but in this case I think there is nothing worth keeping. I think even if it had been posted as a draft it would have been nominated for speedy deletion, I would certainly have deleted in in draft space.

Lee Se Hyun, before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Undercage TFX245S

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Undercage TFX245S, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lapablo (talk) 20:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Review of your new articles

edit

Good job. To finish, please do the following fixes:

You need to be more careful when selecting a new topic to translate - please first check if the article doesn't already have an English Wikipedia equivalent. You can expand them, but you should not create a clone (fork). Then someone has to merge them.

--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:12, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Lead section

edit

Hi, I noticed that in the articles you have created you have incorrectly created the lead section. It might be helpful to read over the manual of style (see the link in the sentence) before.

Best, P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 13:32, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Baekseok

edit

Hello, Lee Se Hyun,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Xx236, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Baekseok for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Xx236}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Xx236 (talk) 12:10, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

9.19 Military Agreement moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, 9.19 Military Agreement, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 00:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:9.19 Military Agreement

edit

  Hello, Lee Se Hyun. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:9.19 Military Agreement, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply