Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunny Prajapati (June 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Lavies road! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pisaachː A Greed (June 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 18:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit
 

Hello Lavies road. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Sunny Prajapati, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lavies road. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lavies road|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Please also review the WP:COI guidelines. It's extremely obvious there's a conflict of interest happening at a minimum (which includes editing articles about yourself) and quite probably undeclared paid editing which is against the Wikipedia terms of use you agree to every time you save an edit. These declarations need to be made. Ravensfire (talk) 15:45, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atithi Kab Aoge Shhamshan (July 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DIVINE was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
 DIVINE  18:07, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022

edit
 

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Sunny Prajapati, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Lavies road, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lavies road|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. You've continued to create articles related to this person. You MUST disclose if you are being paid to edit, or work for any group connected with Prajapati. Ravensfire (talk) 23:14, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Ravensfire (talk) 12:25, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunny Prajapati (July 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bam Bam Bholey for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bam Bam Bholey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bam Bam Bholey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--Bears (talk) 08:10, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pisaachː A Greed (July 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Atlantic306 (talk) 01:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022

edit

Concern regarding Draft:Atithi Kab Aoge Shhamshan

edit

  Hello, Lavies road. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atithi Kab Aoge Shhamshan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Atithi Kab Aoge Shhamshan

edit
 

Hello, Lavies road. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Atithi Kab Aoge Shhamshan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:07, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Pisaachː A Greed

edit

  Hello, Lavies road. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pisaachː A Greed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Pisaachː A Greed

edit
 

Hello, Lavies road. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pisaachː A Greed".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply