Welcome!

edit

Hello, Lauriemonk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Nili Brosh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! David Condrey (talk) 23:23, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at AfC Nita Strauss was accepted

edit
 
Nita Strauss, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~KvnG 22:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nili Brosh (June 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 
Hello! Lauriemonk, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 22:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Nili Brosh (June 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Nili Brosh (July 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
David Condrey (talk) 23:09, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question about User_talk:Lauriemonk

edit

  Hello, Lauriemonk! I'm Bellerophon. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about User_talk:Lauriemonk. You can read the reply at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#23:39:22, 3 July 2014 review of submission by Lauriemonk. Bellerophon talk to me 06:44, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. HC7 (talk) 19:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Jimena Fosado moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Jimena Fosado, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:21, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

OK will review and add additional reliable resources. Lauriemonk (talk) 15:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Jimena Fosado (musician)

edit

  Hello, Lauriemonk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jimena Fosado (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply