Welcome! edit

Hello, Kutnahora, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! †@πωεεṝ@me 18:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mutya ng Pilipinas 2009, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aurora, Taytay and TV5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 17 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mutya ng Pilipinas 2008, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Laguna and TV5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mutya ng Pilipinas 2007 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Valenzuela, Laguna, TV5 and Isabela

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mutya ng Pilipinas 2005 edit

 

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Mutya ng Pilipinas 2005, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Mutya ng Pilipinas 2006. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 14:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Mutya ng Pilipinas page seems to be overly concerned with the career of Maria Carmeniezinas. If she is internationally significant then create a new page about her and link to it from Mutya ng Pilipinas.Mtpaley (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mutya ng Pilipinas 2004, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Miss Philippines Earth 2006 edit

Hello, Kutnahora, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on Miss Philippines Earth 2006, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Miss Philippines Earth 2007. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Miss Philippines Earth 2006 at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 14:52, 11 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Miss Philippines Earth 2006 edit

Hello Kutnahora,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Miss Philippines Earth 2006 for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[:{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, fix

Dom96 (talk) 15:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Miss Philippines Earth 2004 edit

Hello, Kutnahora, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on Miss Philippines Earth 2004, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Miss Philippines Earth 2007. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Miss Philippines Earth 2004 at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 15:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Miss Philippines Earth 2007 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 19 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Miss Philippines Earth 2005 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to CAR, NCR, EVR, CLR, CVR and STR
Miss Philippines Earth 2004 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to NCR

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 11 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mutya ng Pilipinas 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

July 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm GrayFullbuster. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Miss World Philippines 2013, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please note that Missosology is not, and has never been a reliable source. GrayFullbuster (talk) 14:44, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wiki is not reliable as a source edit

Hello, I noticed as I reviewed articles that you have created quite a few about beauty pageants in the Philippines. Several of them used wiki as a reference. This is not allowed, as described in WP:CIRC. I am in the process of removing the links and noting that the articles need WP:RS. Books from university presses are preferred but perhaps not likely with popular culture events. Perhaps some quality newspaper with a good reputation for fact checking mentions the events. Please let me know if you have any questions about what makes a source reliable, or you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard at WP:RSN. Thank you. JanetteDoe (talk) 03:47, 25 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Miss United Continents 2013 edit

Hello, Kutnahora, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on Miss United Continents 2013, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Miss United Continent 2013. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Miss United Continents 2013 at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 22:54, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss United Continents 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quiché (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 5 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Camille Guevarra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jacqueline Schubert edit

 

The article Jacqueline Schubert has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. –Dream out loud (talk) 05:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 16 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacqueline Schubert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Angeli Dione Gomez may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • }}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)   Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Miss Resorts World Manila 2012 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.Reply

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Philippines at 5th tier beauty pageants edit

 

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Philippines at 5th tier beauty pageants, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Philippines at 4th tier beauty pageants. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 06:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Asia Pacific 1983, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miss Asia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Philippines at 5th tier beauty pageants for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippines at 5th tier beauty pageants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines at 5th tier beauty pageants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 16:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Miss Resorts World Manila 2010 edit

Hi Kutnahora. I noticed that you used a blogspot site as a reference on Miss Resorts World Manila 2010. I have removed that because blogs are not considered reliable sources. If you haven't already, please read WP:RS to better familiarise yourself with the guidelines for reliable sources. Cheers! XXX antiuser eh? 20:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 16 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mutya ng Pilipinas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miss Asia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Miss Resorts World Manila 2010 edit

 

The article Miss Resorts World Manila 2010 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable event. No evidence of in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:02, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 5 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Philippines Earth 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mutya ng Pilipinas 2014 edit

Hello, Kutnahora. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mutya ng Pilipinas 2014, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Miss Philippines Earth 2014 edit

Please see my question at Talk:Miss Philippines Earth 2014. Thank you, SchreiberBike talk 17:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Miss Resorts World Manila edit

 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Miss Resorts World Manila, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,  . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 18 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Philippines Earth 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pateros (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Miss Philippines Earth 2014 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:52, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kris Tiffany Janson edit

 

The article Kris Tiffany Janson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cult of Green (talk) 05:07, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Beauty Pageant Ranking, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crowned. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to International Beauty Pageant Ranking may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • be part of this page, pls STOP it! Create your own ranking and certainly not here. Thank you.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Philippines at 3rd tier beauty pageants edit

 

The article Philippines at 3rd tier beauty pageants has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. No evidence of in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Almost all the content in the article is unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:24, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of International Beauty Pageant Ranking for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Beauty Pageant Ranking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Beauty Pageant Ranking until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 20:34, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Mutya ng Pilipinas 2014. edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Mutya ng Pilipinas 2014., and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Mutya ng Pilipinas 2013. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Philippines at 3rd tier beauty pageants edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Philippines at 3rd tier beauty pageants, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.mashpedia.com/Philippines_at_3rd_tier_beauty_pageants.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:41, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss Intercontinental 2014 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Intercontinental 2014 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Intercontinental 2014 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mabalu (talk) 11:11, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 31 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mutya ng Pilipinas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valenzuela. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 13 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Binibining Pilipinas 2015, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santa Cruz and Laguna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Concerns regarding referencing edit

Could you please explain where in this source you added it states that Mary Jean Lastimosa also goes by the name of "Mary Jean Al-Shabrami Lastimosa"? I've removed the source in the meantime as it failed verification.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You've gone ahead and restored the suggested alternative name at Mary Jean Lastimosa using the same source, which I've already brought to your attention does not support the material you're adding. This is a blatant violation of BLP policy and is especially concerning as you have actively falsified a reference. In addition, you continue to add ethnicity to the lead of the article, though only nationality/citizenship is to be included (see MOS:BIO). Finally, you haven't responded to a single issues raised here. In fact, of your 4k+ edits you don't have a single talk page edit, which is hardly the sign of the collaboration required on a project such as this.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 15:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Christi Lynn McGarry edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christi Lynn McGarry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 14:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reyna ng Aliwan edit

This article does not in any way explain what this is. Could you add more prose so that those that do not know, will. Thanks Drjamesphillips (talk) 03:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Also your reference does not work Drjamesphillips (talk) 03:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


Your contributed article, Reyna ng Aliwan edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Reyna ng Aliwan. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliwan_Fiesta. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliwan_Fiesta – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Drjamesphillips (talk) 03:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss World Philippines 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Maria Esperanza Corazon Manzano edit

 

The article Maria Esperanza Corazon Manzano has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KDS4444Talk 14:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

List of beauty contests edit

Please be aware that this is an encyclopaedia, not a fan-forum or the likes. Please do not add incorrect statements, as you did at List of beauty contests. The Banner talk 06:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Eva Psychee Patalinjug for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eva Psychee Patalinjug is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Psychee Patalinjug until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Leren Mae Bautista for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leren Mae Bautista is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leren Mae Bautista until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Philippines at 4th tier beauty pageants for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippines at 4th tier beauty pageants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines at 4th tier beauty pageants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 31 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Republic of the Philippines 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Legazpi City. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Philippines at 4th tier beauty pageants edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Philippines at 4th tier beauty pageants, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://deletionpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philippines_at_4th_tier_beauty_pageants&redirect=no.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your lack of communication edit

Wikipedia is a collaborative project; you are expected to pay attention to this page and respond to the concerns of other editors. Failure to do so may result in your editing privileges being revoked due to said concerns. This is the second time you've been warned about this. When a new message is posted to this page, you will receive a notification similar to the one in this image. The conventions of talk pages are outlined at Help:Using talk pages and Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines.

When you have understood this concern, please summarize the messages on this page (including this one), state how your editing will improve in response to them and place {{adminhelp}} on this page. An administrator will soon remove the warning messages.

In addition, I have deleted Philippines at 4th tier beauty pageants. Being an editor of six years tenure, you should know that you should not repost content deleted at AFD without addressing the reasons for deletion. MER-C 20:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss Resorts World Manila 2011 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Resorts World Manila 2011 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Resorts World Manila 2011 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 20:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss Resorts World Manila 2010 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Resorts World Manila 2010 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Resorts World Manila 2010 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 21:17, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss Resorts World Manila 2012 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Resorts World Manila 2012 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Resorts World Manila 2012 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 21:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss Resorts World Manila 2013 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Resorts World Manila 2013 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Resorts World Manila 2013 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 21:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 26 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Binibining Pilipinas 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Binibining Pilipinas 2016 edit

  • Hi Kutnahora, the sources you were adding (youtube) in the Binibining Pilipinas 2016 article are not reliable and may be deleted If no reliable sources can be found. Information should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish the opinions only of reliable authors, and not the opinions of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. Find sources that are independent (not from a beauty pageant site), you can use google news to look for great sources: https://news.google.com . Also, read WP:RS for more details. Have a great weekend!--Richie Campbell (talk) 16:43, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Unreliable sources include personal web page (e.g. wordpress) or personal websites, open wikis, blogs (refer to personal and group blogs), personal pages on social networking sites (e.g, Facebook), Internet forum postings, or tweets—are largely not acceptable sources. This includes any website whose content is largely user-generated, including the Internet Movie Database (IMDB), CBDB.com, content farms, collaboratively created websites such as wikis, and so forth, with the exception of material on such sites that is labeled as originating from credentialed members of the sites' editorial staff, rather than users.--Richie Campbell (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Colombiabeauty, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Brianhe (talk) 07:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Philippines at major male pageants for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippines at major male pageants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines at major male pageants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 07:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Philippines at 2nd-tier male pageants for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippines at 2nd-tier male pageants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines at 2nd-tier male pageants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 07:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Philippines at 2nd tier beauty pageants for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippines at 2nd tier beauty pageants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines at 2nd tier beauty pageants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 07:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Philippines at third-tier beauty pageants for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippines at third-tier beauty pageants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines at third-tier beauty pageants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 07:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Philippines at modeling pageants for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippines at modeling pageants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines at modeling pageants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 07:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Philippines at regional beauty pageants edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Philippines at regional beauty pageants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Annalie Forbes edit

 

The article Annalie Forbes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable pageant participations and no significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Parul Shah edit

 

The article Parul Shah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kris Janson edit

 

The article Kris Janson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Christi McGarry edit

 

The article Christi McGarry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lourenz Grace Remetillo edit

 

The article Lourenz Grace Remetillo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Philippines at regional beauty pageants edit

 

The article Philippines at regional beauty pageants has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Kutnahora. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Angeli Gomez edit

 

The article Angeli Gomez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

She won Miss Tourism 2013. Is that enough for notability? I would say not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 10:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mutya ng Pilipinas 2013 edit

 

The article Mutya ng Pilipinas 2013 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable edition of non-notable pageant with no reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  00:45, 11 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kathleen Anne Po edit

 

The article Kathleen Anne Po has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 13:40, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rizzini Alexis Gomez edit

 

The article Rizzini Alexis Gomez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources not improved for four years, not shown to meet any notability requirements.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply