User talk:Kingstoken/Archive 3

Latest comment: 5 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Alysia Rogers edit

An argument could be made that she's notable - she's "the back" in the Baby's Got Back music video. However, I am two degrees of separation from this person, so it's perhaps not my call. Bearian (talk) 16:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Violating WP:FILM guidelines edit

I'm sorry to see that you re-added non-notable awards in violation of WP:FILM guidelines that state, in order to prevent awards-bloat, that we do not include organizations / awards without Wikipedia pages. In order to comply with consensus, those additions needs to be reverted. I would ask you not to edit-war in order to violate guidelines. You need to please discuss the issue at the WikiProject Film talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Can You Do Something? edit

Ok, For Whatever Reason, On List of Awards and Nominations Received by The Walking Dead page, People Keep on Removing the iHorror Awards section! They keep on saying that it's spam and not real, when IT IS A REAL AWARD SHOW! Here's the Website: http://ihorror.com/awards/. Also, I am not spamming either! For Users that keep on removing it, they are delusional and too lazy to look it up. I think Drmies and the other users need to get Blocked/Reported or at least get Blocked for 24 Hours. I really don't get how it's spam. So can you Please do something about it?

I wish I could, but I don't have any admin powers. I see it as a legitimate award but others disagree, I have found that if an awards ceremony doesn't have a reviewed Wikipedia page a lot of editors do not see it as a notable award. I know it is frustrating, I have had a lot of my hard work removed by other editors, but it is a unfortunate drawback of a community based site that others can take their disputes too far. My only suggestion is that you could ask for a third party opinion or ask that it be posted on Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard. If you feel any editor is being abusive or conducting an edit war I would suggest you report them to an administrator, I have never done that, but it is my understanding that administrators have greater powers and can block editors, etc. I am sorry I can't be of more help. 17:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

I put it there, Hoping that they would so something about it. But to no Avail, they didn't do a Thing About It! Like Come On, That Stupid user Drmies needs to be blocked! This was Unfair too and I also talked to Brojam, the other person that frequently edits the page. Also, starting this week on the page, some people keep on removing awards without looking them up first. IT'S RIDICULOUS! Seriously you should check it out. And this page is a mess and I think a new page should be created instead or made better — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:84:4501:8003:1DF:D032:2DFC:57D6 (talk) 21:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mayfield Untied Church edit

 

Hello, Kingstoken. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Mayfield Untied Church".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 03:21, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


 

Kingstoken, this barnstar is in appreciation for your work on List of members of the Order of Ontario. PKT(alk) 16:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions edit

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge award edit

  The Bronze Maple Leaf Award
This maple leaf is awarded to Kingstoken for writing 6 new articles, expanding 18 articles and other quality improvements during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 15:28, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Kingstoken. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror edit

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 () 11:07, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Wendell Mitchell has been accepted edit

 
John Wendell Mitchell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 07:48, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October! edit

 
 

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema! edit

 
 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Country Winners
  • Diversity winner
  • High quality contributors
  • Gender-gap fillers
  • Page improvers
  • Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge award (year two) edit

  The Red Maple Leaf Award
This maple leaf is awarded to Kingstoken for improving three park and church articles during the second year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 00:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Kingstoken. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply