Kichuz996

Welcome!

Hello, Kichuz996, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Tina Dabi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• How to write a great article
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Yeeno (talk) 🍁 07:00, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tina Dabi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tina Dabi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Dabi. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 07:00, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tina Dabi (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tina Dabi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tina Dabi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī ^(talk) 15:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Kichuz996! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello TheAafi, how's Draft:P. B. Nooh. I'm currently working on it. Lot's of sources found online. Hope it is good? Kichuz996 (talk) 15:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Kichuz996, It is "no fine" than the one I just declined. Fails any criteria of notability. ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 15:19, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

There is lots of coverages about him. Including the current pandemic, Flood, Sabarimala issues. Kichuz996 (talk) 15:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello Kichuz996. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kichuz996. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kichuz996|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 16:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

I don't have any undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic as you said. Kichuz996 (talk) 00:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

P. B. Nooh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, P. B. Nooh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 16:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prasanth Nair has been accepted

Prasanth Nair, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 17:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prasanth Nair (June 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Long history of promotional recreations by paid editors – see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prasanth Nair (closed 21 July 2015) ; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prasanth Nair IAS (closed 14 September 2016) ; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prasanth Nair (2nd nomination) (closed 23 February 2017) ; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prashanth Nair (IAS) (closed 15 April 2021). This draft shows clearly that the person has not become notable in the last two months.

bonadea contributions talk 17:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

user:bonadea, the last afd states "The result was delete. Coz it's created by a sock". There is much coverage about him on Google. Hope that passes WP:BASIC and meets GNG Kichuz996 (talk) 23:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

What's going on

ST47, this is so cruel! What are you doing? On what basis I belong to the sock? Don't I have the right to know that? How does you confirm that I belong to the sock? I have the right to know that. You must clarify that. Kichuz996 (talk) 01:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

User:Phoenix Man is not blocked as sock too. What are you doing Mr.ST47. I admit that you are an administrator and a check user, but Wikipedia is not your family property. You are not supposed to block someone without proving. If you confirmed that I am a sock to the mentioned, you should prove me too. As I told you earlier, I have the right to know my fault. Kichuz996 (talk) 01:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as sock of User:Phoenix man (not Phoenix Man) David notMD (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prasanth Nair (June 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Usedtobecool was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:32, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tina Dabi

Hello, Kichuz996. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tina Dabi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:42, 9 December 2021 (UTC)