Your submission at Articles for creation: Reetha Ramudoo (July 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, KeechB! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reetha Ramudoo (July 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Novem Linguae was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Novem Linguae (talk) 13:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reetha Ramudoo (July 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 16:08, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Reetha Ramudoo edit

  Hello, KeechB. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reetha Ramudoo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Reetha Ramudoo edit

 

Hello, KeechB. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Reetha Ramudoo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: R. Rajiv Gandhi (October 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 13:55, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

R. Rajiv Gandhi moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, R. Rajiv Gandhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 11:26, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022 edit

 

Hello KeechB. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:KeechB. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=KeechB|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Scottyoak2 (talk) 15:10, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Scottyoak2. Thank you for sharing this . Now I understand this tag has to be on the paid articles which am working for. KeechB (talk) 07:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
{{Connected contributor (paid)
| checked = 21-12-2022
| User1 = KeechB | U1-employer = Reetha Ramudoo | U1-otherlinks = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pongurom_Thingurom
}} KeechB (talk) 08:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
KeechB (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: R. Rajiv Gandhi (December 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 10:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pongurom Thingurom moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Pongurom Thingurom, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 TT me 11:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:R. Rajiv Gandhi edit

  Hello, KeechB. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:R. Rajiv Gandhi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Pongurom Thingurom edit

  Hello, KeechB. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pongurom Thingurom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply