KIEV90

Welcome!

Hi KIEV90! I noticed your contributions to Second Seminole War and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wesoree (Talk) 18:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Capitalisation of food names

You are incorrect that samp is capitalised. The only words in food names that are capitalised are: (a) German foodsthat are capitalised in German, like Spaetzle, and (b) proper nouns that happen to be part of the food name, as in oysters Rockefeller. Samp is neither of these. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:01, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

I will go fix it then. KIEV90 (talk) 20:28, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Dieter Lehnhoff, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You do not seem to have a grasp of our capitalisation style guide and I kindly ask that you acquaint yourself with it before you go further. You are creating far more errors than you are fixing. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Samara flag. Why are you continuing to change national varieties of English, and remove diacritics, when you have been asked not to? Neighbours, colours, honours, centres are all correct, and it is very disruptive to change articles simply to reorient the spellings to the American version. If you have any questions, please discuss at WP:TEAHOUSE. Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your edit to M1919 Browning machine gun has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —Wasell^(T) 🌻🇺🇦 13:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Ivankovo massacre, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Duke of Buckingham's Light Infantry ("The Sky Blues"). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Turgan ^Talk 18:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

It has already been mentioned to you about unnecessarily switching English versions and spelling. Please take heed of this. American English spelling does not need to apply to non-American centric articles. Turgan ^Talk 18:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Henri Désiré Landru, you may be blocked from editing. Turgan ^Talk 18:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Henri Désiré Landru

Go check it out KIEV90 (talk) 20:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During your block, I suggest that you check out WP:ENGVAR. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

I got a +780 on the Rajupunta rifles and I will make sure the edits are correct according to that language or dialect. Now could you please unblock my account.  KIEV90 (talk) 15:31, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Do you understand that those numbers aren't scores in a game? They're merely the number of bytes of information added or deleted. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 15:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

I just read through your guidelines, and I already now know that but, thank you anyways. -KIEV90 KIEV90 (talk) 17:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

I am sorry for my earlier message, and I am sorry for making disruptive edits. Editing Wikipedia is a hobby, and something enjoy doing. I have read through all of your editing guidelines, and I will restore documents very carefully and make sure they are correct according to that language or dialect. Now if you would you please appeal my account.

Thank you, KIEV90 KIEV90 (talk) 17:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KIEV90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here KIEV90 (talk) 17:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Declining on two bases. One is that your block is over, so you should be able to edit. But reviewing it anyway, it was correctly issued, and your appeal also would likely have fell short - comparatively few articles have a "correct language or dialect". Some articles that are specifically aligned to a certain country (etc) do, but most are just set to whatever the article creator used. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you, KIEV90 KIEV90 (talk) 17:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:KIEV90/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 01:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, KIEV90! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 01:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)