Judicial information
Welcome! edit
|
Proposed deletion of "Judicial Investigative Committee" edit
The deletion of an article you created, Judicial Investigative Committee, has been proposed for the following reason:
- unreferenced; signed
You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.
Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
October 2008 edit
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been adding your signature to some of your article contributions. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thanks for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 06:54, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphan tag edit
Hi there. I've replaced the orphan maintenance template on Alan J. Baverman. The threshold to not be an orphan is incoming links from three articles, not including redirects or lists. I would do it for you (just like I wrote an introduction for you), but I'm not familiar enough with the subject to do so. Don't sweat the presence of the maintenance templates though, they don't mean your article is bad or in danger- it's just a way to attract more editors who specialize in fixing such things- or alternatively to let someone who wanders by know that there's something that needs fixing. Thanks for your understanding and for your contributions to the project! Feel free to contact me if you have any more questions and happy editing! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 10:22, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Paul J. Morochnik edit
A tag has been placed on Paul J. Morochnik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster 07:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Alan J. Baverman edit
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Alan J. Baverman. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan J. Baverman. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of Paul J. Morochnik for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul J. Morochnik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul J. Morochnik until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AadaamS (talk) 21:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)