Welcome edit

 

Hello, Jn.mdel, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

As you have just started editing, I hope you find the following selection of links helpful and that they provide you with some ideas for how to get the best out of Wikipedia.

Happy editing! (talk) 10:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Userfied copy of E-rehabilitation edit

Hi, I have userfied your original version of E-rehabilitation at User:Jn.mdel/sandbox. The guidelines of User pages apply to userspace but in general as you intent to work to improve this article there should be no issue with keeping it here as long as you need to. Refer to the comments on my talk page for a longer summary. Thanks (talk) 22:26, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of E-rehabilitation edit

 

The article E-rehabilitation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

None of the sources use the term "e-rehabilitation". This article has previously been redirected, userfied and now recreated. This appears to be an original neologism for a religious/spiritual concept which may be confused with the same term used as an alternative for telerehabilitation. Refer to the existing discussion at Talk:E-rehabilitation and User_talk:Fæ#Regarding_"E-Rehabilitation".

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. (talk) 07:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Integrative Rehabilitation for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Integrative Rehabilitation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrative Rehabilitation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. (talk) 14:28, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Went and added to the sandbox per request. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Shearonink (talk) 01:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Integrative Rehabilitation concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Integrative Rehabilitation, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your article submission Integrative Rehabilitation edit

 

Hello Jn.mdel. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Integrative Rehabilitation.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Integrative Rehabilitation}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polarization E and B modes (May 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TheLonelyPather was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: We already have Polarization (waves).
Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 18:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Before you reject a valid article, may I request you to please revisit your comments and tell:
1. Where does the quoted existing article "Polarisation (waves)" mention about E and B modes? The existing article is only about light waves - whereas this new article is about Polarisation observed in cosmic background radiations
2. You also say the proposed article is "contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia" - may I know how is this possible when the article is cleary talking about a valid topic
3. Lastly, can you please point out where in Wikipedia currently are the E and B modes explained - which is relevant to both cosmic background radiations as well as gravitational waves? Are these topics contrary to purposes of wikipedia?
I hope your comment was probably an oversight and you would be kind enough to remove the rejection comment.
Regards, Jn.mdel (talk) 02:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Jn.mdel! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 18:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply