Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Schlosser, PhD. (March 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 19:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I have recently updated this entry with additional resources. Additionally, please consider this entry as an academic. Are we able to get this entry verified and posted? Jlfranzasu (talk) 20:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Would you please review and reconsider for publication this page. The sources have been extended and updated and additional content has been added. Please note that Peter Schlosser is an academic of high standing and regard internationally. Please let me know if you have any questions. Jlfranzasu (talk) 23:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Jlfranzasu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 19:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Schlosser, PhD.

edit

  Hello, Jlfranzasu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Schlosser, PhD., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Schlosser, PhD.

edit
 

Hello, Jlfranzasu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter Schlosser".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Schlosser

edit

  Hello, Jlfranzasu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Schlosser, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Schlosser

edit
 

Hello, Jlfranzasu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter Schlosser".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:54, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

We have updated this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Peter_Schlosser,_PhD.) to include more references and further state Dr. Schlosser's academic position and background. Please advise how we can proceed with getting this published. Thank you. Jlfranzasu (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Schlosser (environmentalist) (December 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StarryGrandma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
StarryGrandma (talk) 18:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Peter Schlosser has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peter Schlosser. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Peter Schlosser has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peter Schlosser. Thanks! Turnagra (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I added a citation to the education section that links to Dr. Schlosser's CV. For the memberships, i did cite all that publicly show him as a member. Should I include a citation to his CV again as a way to mark the others? Jlfranzasu (talk) 20:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
A person's CV generally isn't considered a reliable source unfortunately, sources generally need to be independent of the subject of the article. If there's any articles which talk about him within the context of alumni of those schools then that would be a better option. Turnagra (talk) 20:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for clarifying. I was able to cite articles that place Dr. Schlosser's research to his time of study and his affiliation to his two mentors. Please advise if additional citations are needed. Jlfranzasu (talk) 23:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Turnagra, all sources do not need to be independent; only those which establish notability. A self-published CV is fine for facts. We usually use CVs as the source for dates of degrees, etc, and commonly include a link to it in external links for articles about academics.
@Jlfranzasu, don't include a list of memberships. Instead put those which are honors rather than ordinary memberships into an Awards and honors section. An elected fellow of the AAAS is an honor. See User:StarryGrandma/Writing an article about a professor or researcher. StarryGrandma (talk) 16:35, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Schlosser has been accepted

edit
 
Peter Schlosser, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:24, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for letting me know. I greatly appreciate the contributions and guidance from all Wikipedia advisors over the course of the 2 years it took to get this article published. Jlfranzasu (talk) 01:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Schlosser (environmentalist) (October 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Schlosser (environmentalist)

edit

  Hello, Jlfranzasu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Schlosser (environmentalist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

An alternate article for Peter Schlosser was published (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Schlosser). It is OK to delete the article referenced above. Thank you. Jlfranzasu (talk) 00:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply