Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Manu Ríos, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Taking Out The Trash (talk) 21:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Felix (rapper), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 01:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Redstar0005. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. I have noticed that some of your recent contributions to Felix (rapper) have been generally nonconstructive or false. Please find a reliable source for your information before stating it and stop deleting things. If you think I made a mistake, you can talk to me on my talk page. Redstar0005 talk to me! 12:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@JanjohansensPlease stop making unsourced claims and make sure you understand how to edit before editing again. Please refrain from editing Felix until then. Thanks! Redstar0005 talk to me! 12:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Felix (rapper), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 🎄🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎄 (🔔📝) 16:03, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Felix (rapper), you may be blocked from editing. 🎄🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎄 (🔔📝) 08:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit

  Your edit to Felix (rapper) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Schrödinger's jellyfish 00:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Minor edits

edit

Hi, Janjohansens! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you have marked some of your edits, such as this one at Rob Jetten as "minor edits". On Wikipedia, "minor edit" has a specific definition that doesn't just mean a "small edit". Rather, a "minor edit" "is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute" (per WP:MINOR). Often, "minor edits" refer to edits that solely focus on formatting or fixing spelling errors. That is, "any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it concerns a single word." Try to keep this in mind as you create your edit summaries moving forward. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

April 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Spf121188. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ludvig Aberg without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Don't remove information, like name pronunciations, without explaining why. SPF121188 (talk this way) (my edits) 17:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Mariagarciacs per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mariagarciacs. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 18:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Thomás Keenan

edit
 

The article Thomás Keenan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability under WP:NSPORT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:03, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Thomás Keenan for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomás Keenan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomás Keenan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:33, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply