Jellyfish
Beware of jellyfish! You are on my user talk page. Please leave any new messages at the bottom, and remember to sign your messages by using four tildes (~~~~). |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
A cup of tea for you! edit
No Jelly in your T. Hypick (talk) 05:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |
Tagging pages for speedy deletion edit
Hello, Schrödinger's jellyfish,
If you believe a User page should be moved to a Sandbox or Draft space, than do that rather than tagging the page for deletion. I have only created my personal page to expose people to this new concept I try to create (and not for my own benefit), if you think I made a mistake just let me know before asking for a speedy deletion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Syndicated_Development Liviuolos (talk)
- Hi, Liviuolos - your user page, as it stands, meets the criteria for U5 of the speedy deletion criteria. Your user page (at the time of nomination) is not the place to write a pseudo-article about yourself - I recommend reading what your user page should not look like. Your contributions thus far appear to be promotional in nature. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Is this better now? Thanks! Liviuolos (talk) 03:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, yes, that looks a lot better! Please excuse my delayed response. Regarding the draft you're writing - it's worth noting that this looks like original research, which we don't allow here. For a topic to get an article, it first has to be notable enough, and receive significant coverage in independent secondary sources that are reliable. An article and any claims in it must be supported by accurate inline citations to those aforementioned sources.
- Before you dive headfirst into creating an article, though, I'd give some of the recommended newcomer tasks like copy editing a try. Remember you can always ask for help either on your talk page with
{{help me}}
or at the Teahouse. Happy editing! I also recommend checking out any available tutorials. Though I'm unsure how to link to it, I've seen plenty of people doing the Wikipedia Adventure. Phönedinger's jellyfish II (talk) 18:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- By the way, I don't have any book yet, but I am developing that concept which with my own bias I think is worth spreading :)... But I want to develop it in Wiki, exactly because it has to be a common thinking, not my own biased opinion... Liviuolos (talk) 03:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Philipbrochard edit
I'm concerned. A personal attack, a lot of additions of unsourced material, claiming that "However, the majority of the scholars (jumhur) are of the opinion that Walima is ..." sourced to[ this. I'm not sure if that's even an RS, must check. Doug Weller talk 07:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm mixed on that being a RS - authors are named, but a lot of the things I try to look for in a RS are pretty unclear. While he does respond at his talk page, responses seem to come a bit after they're sent. Hoping the next reply from him (especially with PA's happening) is understanding like the reply to the contentious topics notice was. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 07:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
hi jellyfish i have given reliable sources please let me know what went wrong and give me guidance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aptearnav (talk • contribs)
- Hi again, Aptearnav! From what you've added to the Apte page, it looks like you're trying to make it a proper page on the surname. If you want to create an article like Smith (surname), I highly recommend going through the tutorial posted at the top of your talk page and creating a draft article there. I've brought Apte up to speed with an article like Gosling (surname). Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also, in the future, you can use the "new section" button at the top right side of the page to leave a new message on someone's talk page. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- hi Aptearnav (talk) 06:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- i would like to know as to why my edit where ive added more notable people was deleted because the page you mentioned about gosling has more that 10 notable people Aptearnav (talk) 06:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, you're welcome to re-add those people, but you seriously need to cut down on your descriptions of them.
- Compare your additions to the article:
- Vaman Shivram Apte (1858 – 9 August 1892[1]) was an Indian lexicographer and a professor of Sanskrit at Pune's Fergusson College.
- Vinay Apte (17 June 1951 – 7 December 2013) was an Indian film and television actor.
- Shanta Apte (1916–1964) was an Indian actress-singer who worked in Marathi and Hindi cinema.[1]
- Prakash Apte Prakash G Apte was a professor at Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IIM Bangalore).[1] He is also a former Director of the institute.[2]
- Urmila Balawant Apte Urmila Balavant Apte is the Indian Founder of the BhartiyaStree Shakti organisation in 1988 which is dedicated to the empowerment of women.
- To the Gosling article, or current Apte disambiguation page, where there's only a simple biographical description (excerpt from the current revision):
- Devdas Apte (born 1934), Indian politician
- Hari Narayan Apte (1864–1919), Marathi writer
- Madhav Apte (1932–2019), Indian cricketer
- Narayan Apte (1911–1949), convicted for assassination of M K Gandhi
- Narayan Hari Apte (1889–1971), Marathi author and script-writer
- I hope this helps. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 06:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- thank you im sorry for all the mistakes i made because i am new to wikipedia i would also like to know that there are some surname pages that have history and origin given unfortunately i dont have a lot of sources but i do have book written in 1914 and a genealogical website of apte surname so please let me know if you have any suggestions Aptearnav (talk) 06:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- No need to apologize! It's better to be bold, do something wrong, learn from it, and improve than to never try to improve anything. I'd check out the Teahouse, a place where more experienced editors can answer any questions you may have. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 06:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- i was wondering if i can make a new page named "Apte clan" where i can write about its origin , genealogy and history and notable historable people in the 17th and 18th century who were in the maratha empire or if i can added this information in the current page with more sources? Aptearnav (talk) 08:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! Unfortunately, I can't really provide more specific advice on creating a new page as I haven't had the chance to create one. Help:Your first article is a great place to start, as is asking questions over at the Teahouse, or Wikiproject India. The hosts there are wonderful & knowledgeable. Jellyfish (mobile) (talk) 18:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- i was wondering if i can make a new page named "Apte clan" where i can write about its origin , genealogy and history and notable historable people in the 17th and 18th century who were in the maratha empire or if i can added this information in the current page with more sources? Aptearnav (talk) 08:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- No need to apologize! It's better to be bold, do something wrong, learn from it, and improve than to never try to improve anything. I'd check out the Teahouse, a place where more experienced editors can answer any questions you may have. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 06:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- thank you im sorry for all the mistakes i made because i am new to wikipedia i would also like to know that there are some surname pages that have history and origin given unfortunately i dont have a lot of sources but i do have book written in 1914 and a genealogical website of apte surname so please let me know if you have any suggestions Aptearnav (talk) 06:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- i would like to know as to why my edit where ive added more notable people was deleted because the page you mentioned about gosling has more that 10 notable people Aptearnav (talk) 06:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Your revert edit
Not to be a dick or anything, since we all make a bad revert every once in a while, but you may want to pay closer attention in the future: it was explained, and the content being removed was completely unrelated to the rest of the stuff in the article. jp×g🗯️ 03:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- You're not being a dick! That was absolutely my mistake. I must have misread, sorry! Jellyfish (mobile) (talk) 17:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)