InMooseWeTrust
Hello World
August 2009 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of linguistic example sentences, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of linguistic example sentences was changed by InMooseWeTrust (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-08-01T01:54:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo was changed by InMooseWeTrust (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-08-01T01:58:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Answer edit
I've answered your question at File talk:Kem prokudin.jpg; it's actually rather interesting. DS (talk) 23:03, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Russian federal subjects edit
Hi there! Thanks for your interest in this project, but I have reverted your edits to the project page because the project is currently inactive. However, if you are truly interested in this topic, please check out WP:RUSSIA, into which the old project was merged. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 17, 2010; 19:58 (UTC)
Interwiki links edit
Hi. I've noticed you've edited the interlanguage links for Internet in many language versions of Wikipedia, switching rm and ro as well as ug and uk. Please note that every Wikipedia can decide itself, in which way they order those links, and that most projects use the language code to determine the sort order, so your changes are incorrect in all those projects (they've been reverted in some, e.g. bs and de, the latter one by me). Note that many bots put those links into the right order every time they edit anyway, so usually no manual corrections should be necessary. Besides, it appears that you've left the interwiki link to each Wikipedia itself in most or all of these edits. If you put a link like [[en:Internet]] into Internet in en.wp, the markup [[en:Internet]] gets visible at the end of the article, so it's a mistake to put these selflinks. Please respect those facts for the future, thank you. Have a nice day. --YMS (talk) 17:24, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference edit
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:48, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Personal information edit
Re: User:InMooseWeTrust/Anthony Bologna. We don't publish the personal addresses and contact information of an individual in an encyclopedia. I have removed the inappropriate material. Do not replace it. Please read WP:BLP and WP:BLP1E. Acroterion (talk) 12:32, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:InMooseWeTrust/Anthony Bologna edit
User:InMooseWeTrust/Anthony Bologna, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:InMooseWeTrust/Anthony Bologna and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:InMooseWeTrust/Anthony Bologna during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 12:37, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of InMooseWeTrust/Reading lists/Religion edit
A tag has been placed on InMooseWeTrust/Reading lists/Religion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- I've moved this to userspace where it belongs: User:InMooseWeTrust/Reading lists/Religion. INeverCry 18:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello World
August 2009 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of linguistic example sentences, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of linguistic example sentences was changed by InMooseWeTrust (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-08-01T01:54:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo was changed by InMooseWeTrust (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-08-01T01:58:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Answer edit
I've answered your question at File talk:Kem prokudin.jpg; it's actually rather interesting. DS (talk) 23:03, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Russian federal subjects edit
Hi there! Thanks for your interest in this project, but I have reverted your edits to the project page because the project is currently inactive. However, if you are truly interested in this topic, please check out WP:RUSSIA, into which the old project was merged. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 17, 2010; 19:58 (UTC)
Interwiki links edit
Hi. I've noticed you've edited the interlanguage links for Internet in many language versions of Wikipedia, switching rm and ro as well as ug and uk. Please note that every Wikipedia can decide itself, in which way they order those links, and that most projects use the language code to determine the sort order, so your changes are incorrect in all those projects (they've been reverted in some, e.g. bs and de, the latter one by me). Note that many bots put those links into the right order every time they edit anyway, so usually no manual corrections should be necessary. Besides, it appears that you've left the interwiki link to each Wikipedia itself in most or all of these edits. If you put a link like [[en:Internet]] into Internet in en.wp, the markup [[en:Internet]] gets visible at the end of the article, so it's a mistake to put these selflinks. Please respect those facts for the future, thank you. Have a nice day. --YMS (talk) 17:24, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference edit
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:48, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Personal information edit
Re: User:InMooseWeTrust/Anthony Bologna. We don't publish the personal addresses and contact information of an individual in an encyclopedia. I have removed the inappropriate material. Do not replace it. Please read WP:BLP and WP:BLP1E. Acroterion (talk) 12:32, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:InMooseWeTrust/Anthony Bologna edit
User:InMooseWeTrust/Anthony Bologna, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:InMooseWeTrust/Anthony Bologna and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:InMooseWeTrust/Anthony Bologna during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 12:37, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of InMooseWeTrust/Reading lists/Religion edit
A tag has been placed on InMooseWeTrust/Reading lists/Religion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- I've moved this to userspace where it belongs: User:InMooseWeTrust/Reading lists/Religion. INeverCry 18:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Kushal edit
Nomoshkar!--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- তোমারও নমস্কার! InMooseWeTrust (talk) 14:59, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Did you look at my India reading list? And I would like to contribute more but I'm dealing with a lot of personal problems at the moment. I have to admit, I also prefer Uncyclopedia over Wikipedia. And if you go on that site, look up the articles on Boris Yeltsin and Bangladesh to see examples of my humor writing. InMooseWeTrust (talk) 03:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 8 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Bilderberg meetings, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Galicia and Lombardi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Aspirant states of India annotated.png edit
A tag has been placed on File:Aspirant states of India annotated.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, InMooseWeTrust. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)