ImmaBeeBe

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Camping Episode has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Camping Episode was changed by ImmaBeeBe (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960644 on 2017-04-02T19:10:31+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, ImmaBeeBe! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rollingcontributor and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! RoCo^(talk) 22:25, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to List of television shows considered the worst. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 06:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

No original research please

See wp:no original research. Content needs to be sourced by wp:reliable sources. Avoid adding your own analysis or opinion. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

ImmaBeeBe, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ImmaBeeBe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Goldfish (cracker) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Goldfish (cracker) was changed by ImmaBeeBe (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957277 on 2017-04-05T06:56:05+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

False positives

Hi ImmaBeeBe, hope you're having a great time here! I've noticed some of your good edits being reverted by Cluebot, which are not vandalism. This is mostly a result of not providing edit summaries. Although your edits are constructive, Cluebot may perceive it as vandalism due to the lack of edit summaries. Also, it is a good practice to provide edit summaries to as many edits as possible. You may remove Cluebot's messages from your talk page and report the false positives. Feel free to ask me if you need any help. Thank you! RoCo^(talk) 09:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, ImmaBeeBe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Criticism of Family Guy have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  DP76764 (Talk) 20:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chef (South Park). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 15:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Satan, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 15:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop

Please stop adding Category:Overweight fictional characters to articles. There have been several which you have categorized as overweight and it's a bit silly, as it isn't mentioned in the article and not particularly accurate. I'd advise against continuing to add things to this category. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Homer Simpson. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Overweight fictional characters has been nominated for discussion

Category:Overweight fictional characters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

May 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 04:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)