Twinbros02

Your submission at Articles for creation: IBMMainframer (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IBMMainframer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IBMMainframer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Amkgp 💬 10:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, IBMMainframer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ Amkgp 💬 10:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Twinbros02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Firstly SORRY for my mistakes. As i am new bie to Wikipedia, I didn't do anything intentionally. I thought i can have access to create a Wekipedia page for my website something like other company have page on wikipedia. that is the reason i kept my user name as my website name also i added my website details. Now i understood that i should not use it for my website promotion. i will make sure this will not happen in future. I am working as an Mainframe programmer with 8 years of experience. i will use this account to update mainframe related information on Wikipedia. So Please unblock my account. thanks

Decline reason:

Please only open one unblock request at a time. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:14, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm willing to assume good faith on your part, but I'd like to clarify that citing your own website when contributing to other articles on Wikipedia will likely be interpreted as a further attempt to promote the business. Can you confirm that you understand this and that you'll refrain from citing your own website when making further contributions? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Twinbros02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes. Now i understood that i should not use it for my website promotion. i will make sure this will not happen in future.also I confirm you that i don't use my account for other articles updates on wikipedia. thanks

Decline reason:

Duplicate request _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:58, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

IBMMainframer (talk) 07:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Could you clarify what you mean by I confirm you that i don't use my account for other articles updates? I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:15, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) The answer/reasons given are quite misleading and confusing. It seems that the account may be used for WP:PROMOTION in future. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Courtesy ping @Rosguill and Jimfbleak: ~ Amkgp 💬 05:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Twinbros02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry for confusion caused. I am trying to convey that I do not use this account for any promotional activity in future on Wikipedia. thanks

Accept reason:

Accepting unblock on the condition that they will not make edits related to IBMMainframer _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

IBMMainframer (talk) 03:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

~ Amkgp thanks for ping, Rosguill I have no objection to an unblock as long as the user is clear that any attempt to write about this topic, whether they consider it promotion or not, will get them blocked again Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Twinbros2, can you confirm that you understand Jimfbleak's warning and that you are able to comply with this restriction if unblocked? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

@Rosguill: - the user has had some logging in issues. I think I've caught the problem so hopefully we should have a reply soon Nosebagbear (talk) 16:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

@Rosguill: - Please consider this as my confirmation for Jimfbleak's warning.

globally renamed IBMMainframer to Twinbros02

globally renamed IBMMainframer to Twinbros02 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)