Welcome to Wikipedia!

edit
 Welcome Heycoco!
Hello Heycoco. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Soapyduck, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
    Introduction to Wikipedia
    The five pillars of Wikipedia
    Editing tutorial
    How to edit a page
    Simplified Manual of Style
    The basics of Wikicode
    How to develop an article
    How to create an article
    Help pages
    What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
    Do be bold
    Do assume good faith
    Do be civil
    Do keep cool!
    Do maintain a neutral point of view
    Don't spam
    Don't infringe copyright
    Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
    Don't commit vandalism
    Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
    Ask a question
or you can:
    Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
    Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
    Fight vandalism
    Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
    Help contribute to articles
    Perform maintenance tasks
           
    Become a member of a project that interests you
    Help design new templates
    Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost
    Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the   button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Soapforduck(Say what?)(Did what?(Leave me a message) 18:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heycoco (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have made edits, and I would appreciate it if you could review them. If there are any misleading or incorrect edits, I understand that my account cannot be unblocked. However, please review my edits and then decide whether to unblock my account or not. I have been using Wikimedia's products since 2019 and have been using Wikipedia since 2020, although I did not create an account until yesterday today I created an account then I made edits but you blocked my account. I have made edits recently, but my account was blocked without a review of whether my edits were right or wrong. Heycoco (talk) 18:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Many of your edits were blanket reverts of constructive edits with no summaries. You were welcoming accounts that had never made an edit. Can you explain how this, for example, was a reasonable revert? Or this? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Request for unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heycoco (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

give my a last chance, you don't give me any warning just blocked my account give me the chance if you think.. give me a chance if I made mistake then block my account permanently Heycoco (talk

Decline reason:

Please respond to the questions posed to you above. 331dot (talk) 19:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

request for unblocking

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heycoco (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear reviewing administrator,

I am writing to request the removal of my block from Wikipedia. I understand the concerns that led to this action, and I would like to address them comprehensively.

Understanding of the Block Reason:

  I acknowledge that my previous actions led to the disruption or damage of the Wikipedia community. Specifically, I understand that my behavior was not aligned with Wikipedia’s standards and policies, which include maintaining a collaborative and respectful environment. I apologize for any inconvenience or disruption I may have caused.

Commitment to Improved Behavior:

  Moving forward, I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines. I have thoroughly reviewed the relevant policies, including those on vandalism, edit warring, and proper citation of sources. I understand the importance of contributing positively and respectfully to discussions and edits.

Future Contributions:

  I am eager to make useful and constructive contributions to Wikipedia. I have identified several areas where I can add valuable content, including topics within my field of expertise. I am committed to collaborating with other editors in a respectful and constructive manner to enhance the quality of articles.

I understand that the purpose of the block is to prevent further disruption, and I assure you that I have learned from this experience. I am dedicated to contributing in a manner that aligns with Wikipedia’s mission and community guidelines.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely, Heycoco (talk) 19:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated unblock requests are not considered. GPTZero score: 100%. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 21:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Heycoco (talk) 19:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

LLM generated unblock requests are unlikely to be successful. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Request for unblocking

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heycoco (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am writing to request the removal of my block from Wikipedia. So, I get what concerns brought about this, and I want to cover it thoroughly. *Block Reason Understanding : I accept that my past behaviour has disrupted or damaged the Wikipedia community. I am referring to my violation of Wikipedia standards and policies, which prohibit fostering an environment that is collaborative and respectful. I apologize for any inconvience or disturbance I have caused. *Taking-The Next Step To Better Behavior In the future, I will do my best to follow the rules of Wikipedia. I have reviewed vandalism and edit warring, and cannot find something shorter. I know that I need to be both good and proper when I communicate on a subject, edits. *Future Contributions: I am excited to contribute usefully and helpfully to Wikipedia. I have spotted some areas where my voice could add value (even in and around my own silo ) I have a commitment to work with other editors in a manner of respect and constructive to improve the quality of articles. # I know the block is in order to stop the further disruption, and I can promise you that lesson has been well and truly learnt. Personally, I have always tried to make my contributions in line with the goal of Wikipedia and following the rules and values of the community.Cryptography blogs are not.Wikipedia is not a collection of blog posts or exits Cryptography Blogs are not even the worst. Sincerely, Heycoco (talk)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please check my request Heycoco (talk) 19:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply