Welcome!

edit

Hello, HeartTicker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --HeartTicker (talk) 23:50, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

HeartTicker, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi HeartTicker! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi HeartTicker! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:54, Tuesday, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The adventures of Uncle Sam: in search after his lost honor

edit
 

The article The adventures of Uncle Sam: in search after his lost honor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NB.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BU Rob13 (talk) 06:35, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please add sources for this article and for the statements you have added at Uncle Sam and Samuel Wilson.
@BU Rob13: I reverted that PROD and edited the article, WP:AGF, but now am having second thoughts as I can find no substantial coverage of the book in Google books or elsewhere online. I will re-prod it now. PamD 07:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
I didn't add that, all I added was a link.--HeartTicker (talk) 20:00, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Adventures of Uncle Sam, in Search After His Lost Honor

edit
 

The article The Adventures of Uncle Sam, in Search After His Lost Honor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 07:35, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, HeartTicker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Information

edit

I am owner of a restaurant I need your help please email me loveguru7863@protonmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.225.56.128 (talk) 14:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Chiranjiv L. Makwana moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Chiranjiv L. Makwana, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NagalimNE (talk) 06:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Makwana Chiranjiv for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Makwana Chiranjiv is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makwana Chiranjiv until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jupitus Smart 14:47, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Theories of punishment" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Theories of punishment and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 7#Theories of punishment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:12, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply