Welcome!

Hello, Haste1066, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for helping us build a great free encyclopedia. We have five basic principles, but other than that, we advise that you be bold and edit. If you ever have any questions or need help, feel free to leave a message at the help desk, and other Wikipedia editors will be happy to assist you.

Thanks again and congratulations on becoming a Wikipedian!

P.S. New discussion threads for you will appear at the bottom of this page.

Conflict of interest

edit

Since you contributed File:John Borling and Wife.JPG, an intimate portrait of Borling and his wife, which you claim as your own work, I presume that you are closely related to Borling. You should read and understand Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy (as well as the policy on autobiographies, if that applies). Writing about yourself or subjects close to you is strongly discouraged due to the difficulty of mainting a neutral point of view. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Library work

edit

On my user talk page you wrote "I work for a military Library and we do this for any notable officers we have texts or artifacts of. for a military Library and we do this for any notable officers we have texts or artifacts of." I note that General Borling is the only topic about which you've written. What other subjects has your library covered? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 01:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Haste1066, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi Haste1066! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Louise Elisabeth Robertson

edit

Hi, I'm Megalibrarygirl. Haste1066, thanks for creating Louise Elisabeth Robertson!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I did a search for sources on this author and didn't come up with any reviews of her work. I am also having trouble finding additional sources to expand the article. If you have additional references from reliable sources, please add them or this article will face deletion. The author may be WP:TOOSOON.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Aunt Bessie's Pork Chitterlings

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aunt Bessie's Pork Chitterlings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2601:188:180:11F0:A1F5:62DB:9D7F:C96B (talk) 15:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion nomination of "Aunt Bessie's Chitterlings"

edit
 

Aunt Bessie's Chitterlings, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. . Lakeside Out!-LakesideMinersClick Here To Talk To Me! 17:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of CSaaS

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CSaaS, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Refspam and paid editing

edit

You've been adding refspam to articles since January. Please stop. If you are being compensated to edit Wikipedia, or you have any other sort of conflict of interest, you must declare it. If you are being compensated, you are legally required to disclose that as a condition for having a Wikipedia account; see WP:PAID for more details. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Louise Elisabeth Robertson for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louise Elisabeth Robertson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Elisabeth Robertson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply