Gwondana2000

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cryphonectria may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• According to [Murr] And.et And.]Cryphonectria P.was first discovered
• The infektion takes place by Asco,and Konidiaspora<though bark wounds.Symptoms;in the early stage;Clear yellow-brown spots appear

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Gwondana2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

I'm afraid that most of the stub articles you are creating and the additions you are making to existing articles are practically incomprehensible because of the poor grammar, spelling, punctuation and style. I have deleted some of these articles because there is no context, and in many cases no references.

Please read the guidelines on how to create an article so that you can at least add categories and references. Other contributors may then be willing to help you put your contributions into good English. In the meantime, you might like to consider using Wikipedia:Articles for creation in order to obtain feedback.Deb (talk) 18:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mundulea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{Benth.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

New articles

It is very obvious that English is not your first language. The articles you are creating are essentially useless and have to be redone. Could you please look at other similar articles before creating a new one. If you look at others, then you will have an idea how an article should be. Bgwhite (talk) 08:39, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Article Space Signing

Please do not sign (~~~~) In the Article Namespace, As you did on Glaucium corniculatum, as it is disruptive, thank you. Francinum (Talk) (Contrib) 19:16, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Alibertia edulis

Hi, I'm Gderrin. Gwondana2000, thanks for creating Alibertia edulis!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for writing this article. I have added a taxobox as was requested but some of the information needs to be properly referenced.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Gderrin (talk) 08:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Gwondana2000/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wia (talk) 14:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! wia (talk) 14:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Gwondana2000/sandbox

Hello, Gwondana2000. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Myosoton Aquaticum

Hello, Gwondana2000. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Myosoton Aquaticum, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. East Anglian Regional (talk) 10:52, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Myosoton Aquaticum

The article Myosoton Aquaticum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I looked at the tags for speedy deletion and none suggested about a plant or 'page needs so much cleanup that readers will probably not understand it.' Furthermore, the page is so messy and does not have any citations/souces to verify the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. East Anglian Regional (talk) 10:55, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your article, Cerastium pumilum

Hi Gwondana2000, your recent article, Cerastium pumilum has no references. While trying to find some on a search engine, I came sites that had its common name as "Dwarf Mouse-ear", not "Dwarf Chickweed". And having Googled "Dwarf Chickweed", I came across sites that said that that was the common name of Moenchia erecta. Now I'm not an expert on plants, but can I ask why this is? Thank you for this in advance.  Seagull123  Φ  20:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

References

Crumenulopsis Sororia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Crumenulopsis Sororia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 12:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Crumenulopsis Sororia

Hello, Gwondana2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Crumenulopsis Sororia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crumenulopsis sororia has been accepted

Crumenulopsis sororia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2020 (UTC)