Welcome! edit

Hello, Good Tamarous, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Clement K. Sylvester, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wgolf (talk) 16:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Clement K. Sylvester edit

 

The article Clement K. Sylvester has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 16:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2015 edit

  Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did with Clement K. Sylvester, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Saduat Yai edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saduat Yai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO   A&E 17:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • I've deleted both articles as neither of them made a credible claim of significance. I strongly suggest you review some of the links in the welcome message at the top of this page before you create any more articles. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Clement K. Sylvester edit

 

The article Clement K. Sylvester has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2015 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Wgolf (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Machar Kounyuk United FC for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Machar Kounyuk United FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machar Kounyuk United FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • I think it is really a shame that instead of trying to learn how to do things propoerly you are just creating more articles of low quality. Facebook is not a reliable source. Literally anybody can create a Facebook page for any reason. I would again urge you to actually read and understand some of the pages linked in the welcome message above, otherwise the articles you create are just going to keep getting deleted, so what's the point? Beeblebrox (talk) 18:09, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
It is also clear that you are editing while logged out, using a few different IP addresses. Taken together, the disruptive behavior you have been engaging in is enough to warrant an immediate block from editing. Please stop removing deletion tags, altering valid markup, and other disruption or both this account and all the IP addresses you have been using will be blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:26, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clement K. Sylvester (May 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Good Tamarous, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2015 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for the persistent addition of improperly sourced material, as well as what appears to be a general lack of editing competence. Note that this block is based both on the contributions of this account and of the various IP addresses that are rather obviously being used by the same person or persons to edit the same material in the same fashion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Beeblebrox (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)Reply