Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Got questions? We have answers! Welcome to Wikipedia, join us at the Teahouse edit

 
Hello! GoodFacts, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

Ahnoneemoos (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ugo Lord edit

I have declined this submission once more. You can see the full explanation in the decline template, located at the top of the submission (click here). I am unsure whether you have simply been unfortunate enough to choose sources that hardly mention the subject at all, or whether this submission is an attempt to credit the subject with accolades he does not possess. Regardless, the submission does not meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria and it cannot be accepted. Unless you can fundamentally re-write and fundamentally re-source this submission, please do not continue to submit it for review. By my calculations is has been declined 9 times already. If you continue to re-submit this draft without fully addressing the underlying concerns then your behavior may be viewed as disruptive. Pol430 talk to me 23:05, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I mean no disrespect. I'm new here and I've been trying to best comply with Wiki policies. I've edited his page several times, removing things and adding things. I started off with direct articles but then told they were not notable enough. Then YouTube clips of his appearances on different shows, then told that YouTube is not a verifiable source. So then I tried providing links to the show's websites then received your comment. I've just been trying to create a good article. I will give up for now and come back later. Thanks for taking the time to review it. GoodFacts (talk) 23:52, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re: Your AFC edit

Welcome to Wikipedia! Everyone was "new" on day. Please make a list of at least 4-5 articles where the subject is the primary topic of discussion. I'll try to help you ! --Tito Dutta (talk) 23:47, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply