Golfodisalerno

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paestum archaeological museum (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paestum archaeological museum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 11:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Golfodisalerno! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 11:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paestum archaeological museum (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paestum archaeological museum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:40, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Paestum archaeological museum has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Paestum archaeological museum. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:National Archaeological Museum of Paestum has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:National Archaeological Museum of Paestum. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 00:53, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Salerno have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Salerno was changed by Golfodisalerno (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891648 on 2023-10-13T12:59:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Salerno. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. If you think this is a mistake, visit my talk page. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 13:22, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft:List of tourist attractions in Salerno Paestum Amalfi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Theroadislong (talk) 09:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gulf of Salerno, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits here were totally inappropriate for an encyclopaedia and more like travel brochure content, please stop. Theroadislong (talk) 09:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Gulf of Salerno. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 13:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for essay-writing

Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia.

I noticed that you created the article List of tourist attractions in Salerno Paestum Amalfi. This is currently written like an essay or other piece of personal writing. Wikipedia is not the right place to publish that kind of content.

Creating an article from scratch is really difficult and usually not recommended for newcomers. That's because it requires you to have working knowledge of lots of different policies and guidelines, and it may be a very frustrating experience. For some guidance, I'd recommend that you read through WP:YFA and work on existing articles to learn more about what kind of content is appropriate for Wikipedia. If you'd like help with the article I mentioned above, please do let me know. However, I don't think it's an appropriate subject for an article, and none of the content currently there is appropriate for Wikipedia; see WP:NPOV, WP:OR, and WP:MOS. Actualcpscm ^{scrutinize, talk} 21:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Dear Actualcpscm,

I wish to thank you for your suggestions.

Effectively, creating an article from scratch is really difficult.

Is for this exact reason that I'm coping the template of "List of tourist attractions in Rome" that seems didn't have any trouble.

Is correct? Golfodisalerno (talk) 21:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

The problem with your article was that it was almost exclusively original research and your own opinions, neither of which is appropriate for Wikipedia. The article you mention 1. cites sources for the claims it makes and 2. does not use WP:PUFFERY and similar inappropriate language. I hope this helps! Actualcpscm ^{scrutinize, talk} 13:04, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

I wish again to thank you.

I will study deeply the template of "List of tourist attractions in Rome" at the light of your helpful suggestions. Golfodisalerno (talk) 17:19, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:List of tourist attractions in Salerno Paestum Amalfi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of tourist attractions in Salerno Paestum Amalfi. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Golfodisalerno

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Golfodisalerno requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 07:57, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Lungomare Trieste moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lungomare Trieste. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is almost entirely unsourced, and is written in a promotional tone quite unsuitable for an encyclopaedia. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lungomare Trieste (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lungomare Trieste and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Editing concerns

Hello. I can see you are doing what you think is best to improve articles about the region that you've named your Wikipedia account after. I can also see that you've started editing on English Wikipedia after a few years of occasional editing on Wikivoyage and it.wiki etc.

Although I am sure you're trying to edit in Good Faith, I am concerned that you are rushing into making edits without fully appreciating how we work here. So I am asking you to slow down, look at edit summaries when someone reverts you to understand why that happened, and not repeat the same edit immediately afterwards. You do right (as I see you already have done in the past) to ask questions of an editor why they may have reverted an edit. That is a good way to learn.

Please do not simply add an external link to a section heading and expect that to remain in place. You can link to quality downloadable books via a 'Further reading' section, or use specific pages of a larger book as part of an inline citation by citing author, title, publisher, year or publication and page number(s). See WP:REFBEGIN. Do not, (as you did here) link to an information page on a commercial tourism website - that's spamming us with low quality content. Find better published sources to support factual statements please, and avoid just adding a WP:BAREURL if you could, please. You are welcome to cite published guidebooks, even if written in Italian. But please specify page numbers so other can more easily verify any factual statements you have added.

I sense that you seem to be on an urgent mission to promote the area you live or work in, and so I need to ask if you have a Conflict of Interest by, perhaps, being employed by a tourism company or local cultural organisation? There's nothing wrong in being so connected - but we need clarity as to your editing motives. If you are, then please follow instructions at WP:COI to declare on your Userpage any such connections. If you are being paid to create content here, then please follow our obligatory instructions at WP:PAID to declare such employment.

If you need further guidance, feel free to ask at the Teahouse. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 14:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your substantial intervention which I really appreciate.

I confirm your feeling, I have an urgent mission to promote the area where I live, but I have no conflict of interest, I am not employed in a tourist company nor in a local cultural organization.

Simply the area where I live has a tremendous need to be known to the rest of the world and no one is doing it.

It needs to be known because it has enormous tourist potential that is very little exploited, especially in the English language.

As an unemployed person, I have the hope that helping to promote the area in which I live can improve its economic conditions and therefore, perhaps, improve mine too. Golfodisalerno (talk) 10:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

That is NOT inline with Wikipedia guidelines, please STOP now. Theroadislong (talk) 11:24, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

I' ve stopped every action on Wikipedia. I understand that some similar (identical) articles can stay with no troubles and mine not. I understand. Golfodisalerno (talk) 12:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Please see other stuff exists. Each article or draft is judged on its own merits. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to get by us- this does not justify the existence of more inappropriate articles; otherwise nothing could ever be removed from Wikipedia. We can only address what we know about. We have millions of articles but only a few thousand regular editors to address problematic articles.

If you would like to help us, you could work to identify other inappropriate articles you have seen so action can be taken. We need the help. 331dot (talk) 12:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

"Simply the area where I live has a tremendous need to be known to the rest of the world" is a promotional purpose and not permitted on Wikipedia. Our only interest is in summarizing independent reliable sources about topics deemed notable by WIkipedia. Anything else is a side benefit and not our goal. 331dot (talk) 12:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

"Simply the area where I live has a tremendous need to be known to the rest of the world" was to explainy action as not employed in a tourist company nor in a local cultural organization. Golfodisalerno (talk) 20:19, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

There must be many well-written published tourism guidebooks and other academic resources in local libraries which you could use to add valuable content to articles on this area (rather than links to poor quality sources or Google maps)? Perhaps I could simply ask you to take a little more time and treat this as a serious encyclopaedia, based on really good sources of historic and cultural information? If you can do that, then your contributions will be worthwhile. But just promoting an area in the rather haphazard way you have is not that helpful. Take you time and learn to contribute more carefully and effectively, if you can. Many thanks, Nick Moyes (talk) 11:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for suggestion. I appreciate. Golfodisalerno (talk) 17:17, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Archaeological Museum of Paestum has been accepted

National Archaeological Museum of Paestum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lungomare Trieste

Hello, Golfodisalerno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lungomare Trieste".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 03:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)