User talk:Glen/Archive7

This page has been archived please do not edit it. If you'd like to discuss one of the topics below, do so by clicking here

I AM INNOCENT!

I've been Autoblocked. You were blocked by Nlu for the following reason (see our blocking policy): Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Hessticles". The reason given for Hessticles's block is: "inappropriate user name, vandalism". Your IP address is 205.188.116.6. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.188.116.6 (talk • contribs) 25 September 2006.

Reply (my revert in Fuck)

Hi Glen, I was trying to clean up the vandalism of User:Vrrayman1892. (Along with his previous attack socks [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], and [8]), and one later one, [9]. The tag was in place immediately before he went on his rampage, so my revert reinstated it. Looking back through the changes, the tag was apparently added in this edit; if that edit was vandalism, and I inadvertantly reinstated it, then you have my sincere apology. -- Jim Douglas 13:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

In this case, I wasn't consciously adding the tag, just working on the assumption that whatever Randall did was vandalism. Apparently he's well-known around here; this was my first experience with the person. I innocently sent him a standard vandalism warning, so he singled me out for special attention. Thanks for the pointer to WP:RFP. -- Jim Douglas 14:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Your Opinion

This link: http://www.ntpowerhouse.com/ - spam or not? Check this out [10]. The guy who insists that adding this link to the Bodybuilding article will make it more of a world view, instead of American-centric, is named after a dog that used to be featured on this page (Yembi the security dog)[11] - bad evidence I know, but it's there. I'm pretty sure he's just spamming as he has no other edits on Wikipedia, but now he's wasting time with an AMA request. I've never seen anyone go to such lengths to have one link inserted into one article! I'm not trying to sway anyone's decision, but if you can have a look and post your neutral thoughts it might save some people some time. Thanks. Yankees76 16:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Iranian horse

Hi Glen, I've deleted the copyrighted contents, please don't remove that article again, you could add copyright violation tag to that article. In fact, I didn't save that article on my computer, so you made me prepare it again!. Also I want you to help find more information about Iranian horses...

Sasanjan 19:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 25th.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 39	25 September 2006	About the Signpost

Erik Möller declared winner in Board of Trustees election	Wikimania 2007 to be held in Taipei
Arbitration clerk Tony Sidaway resigns	Report from the Dutch Wikipedia
News and notes	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

RFCU request

Hey Glen, just a small reminder; with future requests, make sure you remove the tag at the bottom of the RFCU requests when you list them on the main page. 1 Cheers, and keep up the good work, Daniel.Bryant 09:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Bot warnings

Hello! I do agree with the message you deleted. Regarding the incident you mentioned, I didn't realise I had archived a current bot warning until after I had hit save, and then I noticed that someone else had blocked the IP in question, and so decided that it really wasn't worth going back to reinstate it. Best wishes, and keep up your vigilance: we need it! --RobertG ♬ talk 17:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Terryeo's latest

Glen, I thought that you would like to take a look at this: [12] He seems to be doing the same types of stuff on policy pages as he did on Scientology pages. --Fahrenheit451 03:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

GreekWarrior

Hi Glen, thanks for taking care of the GreekWarrior issue. Sorry I hadn't seen your reports on ANI and RCU before I filed mine. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

AWB

Sorry to disturb you (backlog of emails, I see :D), but I was just wondering if you had AWB, and had spell-check working on it. If you do, and could spare however-long-it-takes to check a four-paragraph article, could you drop me a note on my talk page so I can give you the article? Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 09:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Not on this PC mate, sorry... Glen 09:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Horizonte Medio

Thanks Glen. Turned out to be one of those times where the best thing to do is do nothing ;) Happy reading. Thε Halo ^Θ 09:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Thanks!

Cheers, Blainetologist 14:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! And let's hope that category keeps growing.--Konstable 14:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Need help with vandal

Hey Glen S,

Please help me block the user at IP address 82.198.250.11. I'm not sure how. Check out the two incidents of vandalism (today 27 Sept) at the article on Michael Palmer. I see you have already given him the final warning. Now it needs to happen.

Thanks ahead of time if you can help me. I'll check back later and revert the Michael Palmer article later this afternoon if it hasn't been done.Christian Roess 16:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Talk:American Library Association revert

Did you mean to do this revert of a talk page archiving? --Alecmconroy 01:33, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with that vandal!

Thanks for your help Glen :)

Glad to have your help here in the Wikipedia community. Many here work hard on articles and pieces because we care deeply about these subjects. It's hard to communicate that care and passion to others when vandals interfere. Take care, Christian Roess 01:58, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Appreciate your message. I will definitely consult you again when future vandalism problem arise!!!Christian Roess 01:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

User:성혀니 - and your "STOP!" outburst at fellow admins

I thought your bark Stop blocking this user! at the other admins who were simply following policy was a little uncalled for - especially the instructions I given on his talk page regarding the steps involved in getting the name change were:

“ (1) Add {{unblock-un|new username}} to your user talk page. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page. (2) Soon, an admin may come to unblock you. (3) You will have 24 hours after the unblock to file a request on Wikipedia:Changing username before you may be re-blocked. ”

As he's still editing now well after this 24 hour window was due to shut shows if anything they were following policy correctly, and perhaps you could have been a tad more civil. Just my $0.02 Glen 08:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

This guy is a obviously an eager and productive editor. He shouldn't be punished just because there's a backlog at Wikipedia:Changing usernames in processing his already forwarded request. --  Netsnipe  ►  08:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Glen S! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. —Xyrael / 15:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry it took me so long. A few days back I did an approval run on 1.2.2, but unfortunately they don't seem to have gone through. I think it'd be good to have a second pair of eyes - would you mind taking a look? Thanks very much. —Xyrael / 15:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Quite honestly, I have very little idea what is going on. Anything you need me to do? Thanks. —Xyrael / 17:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I've realised that there are quite a few mistakes with my recent run, involving the approved list not being updated. Any ideas; have you been seeing similar situations? —Xyrael / 17:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, things really are porked, but I'm a vegetarian ;) —Xyrael / 15:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Argh! I don't get it :( —Xyrael / 18:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Mmm, I was referring to the striked out text :) —Xyrael / 19:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Heh, okay 8) —Xyrael / 08:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

thanks

Hi Glen, pleased to meet you! That was nice of you to leave a message on my talk page during this difficult time. Thank you very much! --Kyoko 18:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Large portions of the parabens article have been erased.

Hello, There are two different editors which are both erasing entire sections of this article. Please oversee the history page and article.

I am a new user that does not know what to do in this situation. I think removing large sections of the parabens article may be vandalism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Parabens&diff=78477710&oldid=78447944 Thank You. --63.17.32.188 19:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

I added the info about precautionary principle and a lot of other sentences. All info was erased. My first experince with Wikipedia was not a very friendly one. I will pass on joining Wikipedia for now. --63.17.32.188 19:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

The article on parabens is all one sided POV pushing. The information about the precutionary principle is gone. Can I add it back in or not?

Wikipedia is about a neutral point of view. The parabens article is anything but. --63.17.32.188 19:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Hi Glen, I came across this conversation you're having pertaining to me and the parabens article. For additional information, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry and also the explanation I gave at the article's talk page. If you have concerns about my edits, please let me know. --Ed (Edgar181) 20:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Please look at the article's history - on no occasion did I make more than three reverts. Please remove the warning on my talk page. Please talk to me if you have concerns about my edits, rather than giving boilerplate warnings. --Ed (Edgar181) 20:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Precautionary Principle section for Inclusion in the parabens article.

"Hello",

Its me again, the 63 user. I think the info about 'precautionary principle' belongs in the parabens article because it represents a current shift or movement away from parabens along with other type ingredients. A lot of people reject this movement. Others embrace it. Shopping at a health food store is a good idea. Now even Walmart has a large organic section. Anyways, there are two users who disagree with me about. If I add this info one of them will eventually erase it. If not today then next week. I am happy with my contributions but sad it got erased because others disagree. If you agree you can add this info back in. I will let you be mediate this POV dispute. Also, I would like to add a some more sentences that were erased for the article to explain all sides of the issues regarding parabens. The current article is completely bias right now. This is more than obvious. --Frown Smiles 00:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

"Hello", It just me again, the 63 American user. I have updated the parabens article. Someone wrongfully changed the name of the article from Parabens to Paraben. Since Parabens represent a group of ingredients I think it should be changed back to Parabens. Thanks for telling me to be bold in my writings. I added two short paragraphs that are Wikipedic and relavant. There is a current shift away from parabens worldwide. The fact remains parabens are a concern which I explained accurrately about the ongoing current event. More than 90% of cosmetics sold at the health food stores in the United States of America are Paraben Free. --63.17.87.240 17:54, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Blocking of 67.167.61.249

I reported this user at WP:AIV just as you were blocking him, but don't know if, not being an admin, I'm allowed to remove the report myself from that page once it's been posted. Can I? --Rrburke 03:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

I do it all the time. Go ahead. MER-C 08:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Seriously, dude

Why do I keep missing you on IRC... Bastiq▼e ^demandez 13:40, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Autoblock

Please remove my block so that I can continue editing the stub on G.H. Ojha.
Thanks
SUSHRUTA —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SUSHRUTA (talk • contribs) 22:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Re:Wait a tic

Well I spotted those edits in recent changes, and I was like "KoS deleted his own page?". However, Someone (The Anome) had an impersonator(The MOO vandal) that I dealt with before and saw the I, and then I saw the user creation logs and saw that you were responsable, so by then I pretty much kissed my Wiki-ass goodbye. "Shit, I'm banned. I messed with the admins." I'm mildly familiar with the Multiple Account to Prevent Impersonation rules, although I was a bit late to remove it by the time I saw you had caught the edits.

Is it really applicable to have someone else impersonate someone in order to get the impersonator account blocked? I'm confused, this seems like something KoS mighta done himself.

Eh. Whatever.

Logical2u 01:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Can I confide in you?

I have a wee confession. I, Steve, have a crush on you. KOS | talk 01:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Finally, now we can stop talking about it behind your back!--§hanel 01:40, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

LOL, that's the hardest I've laughed on RC patrol in a while. I had "know" idea. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 02:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

IRC

You just ditched us in #wikipedia, did you? :D Daniel.Bryant 02:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

The only ...

Go right ahead! I already saw that and your response ... :-) it's in good hands. Antandrus (talk) 03:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Just a note..

I do not appreciate you being capricious on my behalf. KOS | talk 04:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC) I'll re-write my original comment: I do not appreciate the way you attempted to be witty on my behalf.

No it's fine Glen, I'm well aware of your playful nature, and yes I was smiling slightly. I'm more disappointed in the use of WP:POINT, on my behalf. Though it appears everyone else had a nice laugh. Really it's no big deal, please put the matter out of your mind and do not feel bad. KOS | talk 04:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Glen/Archive7

I award you the Daniel.Bryant Blue Star of Thanks for your kind support for my candiacy at the Esperanza elections of September 2006. Although I didn't make the council, I have every faith in the three wonderful new Councillors, and I again thank you for your support. Daniel.Bryant 10:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Unblock of User:GreekWarrior

I have unblocked User:GreekWarrior per their request to bring their case before arbcom. Naconkantari 01:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Mrpete

I've already blocked him. My tolerance level for vandalism is pretty low right now. -- Steel 01:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

BTW, Glen, you've got some leftover Mrpete vandalism at the top of this page. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 02:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

sleep Reganald sleep!!

Reganald? Who is Reganald? Bastiq▼e ^demandez 02:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

User:▄▄█▀▀ █▬█ █ ▀█▀!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That has to be the most awesome username I've ever seen. ;-) —Khoikhoi 07:21, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Plus, I can only imagine what it would look like as a signature. BTW, I think HOW DID YOU DO THAT? (talk · contribs) is the same guy...when you block usernames does the IP get blocked as well? —Khoikhoi 07:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Reply

Along those lines but i dont have logs so I cant remember exactly what he said. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 10:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

IP block

User talk:82.198.250.14 is RFU-ing. As the blocking admin, I'll let you handle it. Daniel.Bryant 10:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

JayFox161 (talk · contribs · page moves · current autoblocks · block log)

JayFox161(Autoblocks • block log) Collateral damage from AOL user block, please help clear --152.163.100.198 19:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello Glen,

I thought about using my account to edits pages but I still prefer to not use any account. Having an account is like someone is watching your every move. This is equivalent to having your phone tapped! Without an account I can do edits without big brother following me. I have made edits to Potassium sorbate and other articles today. It feels more comfortable without an account. Well... I have finsihed editing the parabens article. I rephrased about 3 sentences and contributed about 3 sentences that have been shortened by another editor to the parabens article. The article is in great shape now. After the storm I now see the sunshine. I have learned and grown from my experinces. I understand Wikipedic sentences must not include too many flowerly type words. My frown is now upside down so to speak>>> //(:_._:)\\ Frown Smiles 23:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 2nd.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 40	2 October 2006	About the Signpost

New speedy deletion criteria added	News and notes
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

A Suggestion

Hey Glen.

Look at the Jay Cutler and Ronnie Coleman pages. I added a grid that shows their title history. Tell me what you think and where you think an appropriate place would be. Should this be something we should do if they get 1st in a contest?

Bizkit 21 2002 03:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

GreekWarrior

Just a heads-up: GreekWarrior, whose community ban you implemented the other day, is appealing against the ban at Arbcom. Thought you might want to be informed. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:16, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Usernameblock

[13]
How do you get to those so fast? -- Steel 14:07, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

They show up in Special:Recentchanges and on the recent changes IRC feed. MER-C 14:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Close! See Steel's talk for my reply. This actually shows the newusers 10-15 seconds before they show in the vandalism-en-wp channel, and before they show at Special:Newusers too :) Glen 14:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm getting timed out while trying to connect. I'll check it later. -- Steel 14:20, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I'm in. Wha exactly happens? -- Steel 14:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Done!

And you would be?

That was already dealt with. --Backhander 16:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Backhander doesn't know when to quit. I'd rather not deal with a guy looking for a flame war right now, there are better things to do on Wikipedia. He claims he can block me and is misquoting me, it like he's looking for trouble... Logical2u 16:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Done!

FYI

I cited a comment, so any other passing editor could see for themself what happened, but because i am nice here it is for you again:

I said "several" not "seven". There is a difference.

Also there are people behind IP addresses and they also count as people, hence attacking them is a personal attack.

Telling someone to leave is very impolite and a borderline personal attack. Saying that he is pathetic IS a personal attack and as such here you go.

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. --Backhander 17:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Srebrenica article again

Please investigate possible immediate responses regarding the IP address 68.126.253.36 Someone using this IP address is gutting the Srebrenica article from this IP address that has never been used before on wikipedia. Thank you. Fairview360 00:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Holiday

Well, I'm off, so I'll talk to you in 10 days time. Make sure you keep a watch on my talk page (and see the header of my talk page, it may be insightful to both you and other users). Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 12:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Done!

User:AspieDirector

Perhaps merging this article into the autism Wiki might be an idea? It is a pretty interesting subject (I have seen all his videos). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AspieDirector (talk • contribs) 8 October 2006.

Done!

Re: Our wee friend.

Seems as if Wiki-karma DOES exist... I'll probably get something nasty in the end as well, if that's the case. Logical2u 22:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Thank you for writing!

Glen, thank you so much for taking the time to answer my question. Xiner 14:04, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Done!

Alrite, I've another question. Why do some templates use {{...}} for linking? Thanks a lot. Xiner 23:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

LOL

Hahaha...I just went to my talk page, and I literally got blinded by the light. I was like O SHIT vandalISM!

I guess it wasn't. Anyway, it's pretty cool. Thanks a lot, Glen. Nishkid64 21:32, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Although I am a color freak...and red-green colorblind (maybe that's why I like all these colors), I'm not a fan of pink. Anyway, it looks pretty cool as it is. I just have one comment about it. Where's the toolbox or the navigation links? P.S. Did you make this? Nishkid64 21:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Wow, that's amazing! I added it to my monobook.js, but it seems that some of the links such as "monobook.js" and "monobook.css" on the side link to yours instead of my own. How can I fix that? Nishkid64 22:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Yay! Thanks for fixing. I realized I got too much color here (and lack of search button), so I reverted back to the normal Wikipedia page in the .css. Thanks for everything. This is very very very useful. =) Nishkid64 23:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

I think I'm good for now. I removed the css, but kept the monobook and now I got all that I need. (I think). Thanks again. Nishkid64 23:24, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Wait...what am I ctrl+R'ing?? I've been using the monobook that you had the whole time. (I've been vandal-fighting haha...it's awesome). Nishkid64 23:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I have all the tabs. (I ctrl+R a long time ago). I'll get on IRC. What channel are you on? Nishkid64 00:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm still a newb with this IRC stuff. It says "I need to be identified to join the server". Any clue what that means? Nishkid64 00:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Done!

RfA thanks from StuffOfInterest

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which finished with a tally of 52/6/1 (~90%). It was an interesting process which gave me a chance to learn a bit about myself and about the community. My intention now is to slowly ease into using those additional buttons on my page. No use being over eager and mucking up the works. The support of all those who went over my record and/or rallied to my defense after the big oppose vote was instumental to the success of this review. Again, thank you! --StuffOfInterest 11:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 9th.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 41	9 October 2006	About the Signpost

Interview with Board member Erik Möller	Wall Street Journal associates Wikipedia with Grupthink
Account used to create paid corporate entries shut down	Report from the Portuguese Wikipedia
News and notes	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 16:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

User name rename

You are now known as Glen on Commons :) Bastiq▼e ^demandez 17:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Re:speedy deletion page

Quick question regarding the tag that you removed. The page was tagged for removal due to the fact that there was a privacy concern regarding some of the info that existed on the page. Most of the info was posted by the owner of the account anyway. Would you be able to remove the page? (there was an agreement with an administrator that this will fit the special cases proviso). Thanks. Removepagerequest 19:06, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Edits to Vermilion River County No. 24, Alberta

You have rightfully identified one of my edits as unusefull (it was one made by mistake). You have then reverted all my edits to that article, which were expanding the article on par with the other ones in that category. While I understand and appreciate your efforts, I suggest you pay more attention when reverting multiple edits. It's also a good ideea to assume good faith before labeling something as vandalism. Thanks for your understanding. --Qyd 13:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

DOMINAT3

Please block this user. He vandalized France after repeated warnings for vandalizing Star Trek. It's aparently a pure-vandal account. --SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 12:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

• Also, he just removed all the warnings from his talk page. --SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 12:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

• My first barnstar! Thanks for the warm-and-fuzzy. --SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 14:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Conductive education

I PRODed this article due to length and possible copyright issues. It looks like a scholastic paper copy and pasted into WP, complete with notations. It looks way too long and in-depth for WP. Can I get you to put a second pair of eyes on it and see what you think? Thanks! --SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 15:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Approved for VP; username changed

Hi there, Glen, you may remember that you approved me to use VandalProof about two months ago (if you don't, here's a link to prove it]). We had trouble with my login, likely because of the umlaut in my name. I have since had my username changed (see this link) and am hoping this will solve our problems. I see that, for whatever reason, my old username was removed from the list; I'm wondering if you'd be able to add my new username directly, since I've already been approved. If not, of course I'll just add myself to the awaiting approval list and try again. Thanks for your help. Heimstern Läufer 17:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

User page

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. much abliged Hu12 20:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Borrow

I saw that Nishkid64 had a cool flash animation: User:Nishkid64/StatusChange2|OMG

I liked it so I asked him to borrow it before I used it but he saud I should ask you. So, in case you are a little slow (just kidding, no harm intended) I will state it out: may I botrow your your flash-work for my page?

Thanks!

Also, since I'm a new user, and you seem to have expertiece in the area, could you give me a cool signature and anything else you feel like! Of course you don't have to, but it would be appreciated! Thank you!

sorry forgot about this... Randfan 21:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you so much!  :) Randfan 22:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks a bunch. I also liked the fact that i have no missing chuncks of Da.Tomato.Dude and little bite-marks all over myself. :) What you said/typed was really useful, and I shall now go on with my imperfect ways (ex: On to clean my room! Wait, first, i have to find the floor. Gee, I've never seen that before...). Again, thanks! *SMILYS FOR ALL*--Da.Tomato.Dude 01:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

ARCH!! MORE QUESTIONS!

More questions. So, how do you insert another page? (I'm sorry that I wasn't clear the last time, I was too busy looking for my floor) I understand your intricate description of links (look! My spiffy talk is now all linkified!), but how do you get a new page? I felt that my userboxes were overflowing and deleted like 9/10 of them... Thanks again. *SMILYS FOR ALL*--Da.Tomato.Dude 02:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

PS:

Ehe, i have this huge-gigantic-abdominable smily on my userpage, could i make it smaller? --Da.Tomato.Dude 02:33, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Have a barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I've ran intro your reverts so many times lately, keep up the good work! Michaelas10 (T|C) 23:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Hmm...

Good point. I'll take a look. You have no idea how much I wish folks would read the tutorials before contributing, or to at least look at another article to get an idea of the formatting. Thanks much, pal. Friday draws near.  :) - Lucky 6.9 23:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

I hear ya. Take a look at the comments on my talk page. Everyone wants to be on Wikipedia but no one's willing to read what it takes to get here. Best I can claim is stuff I've done on pages I've created, but nothing autobiographical. We persist.  :) - Lucky 6.9 00:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanx

Hi Glen, thanks for reverting the blanking on my page. Best of luck, The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 00:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. I didn't mean to be rude but it took time to write that and I was afraid it wouldn't be added.

Jean Case

Can you please review my revisions and discussion on the Jean Case page that you tagged for deletion? I am happy to make additional changes if you think they are warranted, but I removed many links and made the page more factual and straightforward biographical information.

As a comparison, Kate Carr, the head of a brain cancer organization, has a page that's very similar, that wasn't tagged for deletion. What is the difference? I would say that Jean Case is a more notable figure as a philanthropist and former business executive, and the format of her bio is very similar.

Thanks.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mmiller20910 (talk • contribs) 11 October 15:55 (UTC).

Help

I am new here, just wondering how you get the links to go to other pages and how you create other pages. -Da.Tomato.Dude

XD Thanks

Tehe. Gotta Love Library Computers and the idiots who forget to log out! w00tness for me! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kalarn (talk • contribs) October 13, 2006.

unhelpful

Hi,

I received a message concerning my edit of the acupuncture article and was wondering why it was considered unhelpful. My change was well written and included no factual errors. The current article is very misleading and does not reveal the current lack of evidence for acupuncture. The writer clearly believes that this technique based on invisible energy fields is a valid alternative to scientific medicine for people who have real illnesses and need actual care. Only one of the scientific theories he lists is actually a scientific theory (the one I left in) The rest have absolutely no basis in biology. They simply use scientific terminology to confuse people into thinking that an actual biochemists or microbiologists agree with it. Under criticism he states "TCM theory predates use of the scientific method, and has received various criticisms on that basis" Do you believe this? It is not criticized because it is old but because it makes no sense and has no evidence to support it. The fact that it was proposed long before humans possessed any real knowledge of chemistry, biology and physiology, tissue organization, organs and organ functionality, the circulatory system and endocrine systems, the function of the brain, the existence of cells and genetics, and countless other discoveries made over centuries and tested repeatedly using logical experimentation and empirical analysis does not enhance its credibility. However, I do realize that some of my statements did not appear neutral. What does it take to change an article?

Disputes, revised.

That upon Ann Coulter's ignorance was something that needed to be placed in at some place without a whole essay upon her rather flawed beliefs on Canada. If a person is known for this kind of thing it should not be hidden, as it is seen that you do allow for other media figure's known flawed beliefs such as Mel Gibson's strong anti-semitism. I know a vast number of Canadians who have taken an offense from her opinions and it should be mentioned in some place. This is now the third incident that I have seen something removed that is a simple piece of trivia that a person might benefit from knowing. I have seen many similar tidbits on other topics that have been allowed to stay, so this is leading me to believe that there are impartial moderators on this site that simply delete information when they don't like the image it portrays, even if it is more unbiased.

Well I suppose I can try to find those laughably bad panel interviews I saw with her online.

Amrita Rao

I don't think it's a content dispute when someone is posting something that is patent nonsense. Repeatedly, being banned, and coming back from another IP. But ... since the poor fellow has stopped trying to write himself into Amrita Rao's life, we'll let it lie. Zora 01:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

African Bodybuilding

Yembi returned, put the link back, deleted the warnings I left for him on his talk page and left you a nice little message on the Talk:Bodybuilding page. Enjoy. Yankees76 15:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

in wiktionary search for "transwiki: abgusht"

Re:Apologies... but I know how you feel!

Dag, yo! That sucks. Someone definitely needs to fix this for both of us! Well, I guess I should just go ahead with going the old-fashioned way. I figure I should be approved again by some other moderator (though who knows how long that'll take, with how long the list is now. :S) Well, thanks for trying, and I hope all is well. See you around. Heimstern Läufer 20:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the welcome message on my talk page. Now that we've all confirmed that I am neither perfect nor unbold, I'll get started on my Wikipediaism! :) --Fudgegirl1995 21:24, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Reversion of Stephen Campbell

Hello. Can you please explain this reversion of the Stephen Campbell article. I made an error in moving the page which I hope to soon correct, but this appears unrelated. Thanks. Khatru2 22:37, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Those extra lines were vandalism that I had reverted. Khatru2 22:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

For dealing with that spammer, I couldn't have kept up with the reverting for much longer on this connection! :D Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:49, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

RE: delpage

Nah, those ones I specifically requested to be un-deleted, and don't feel like having them re-deleted now.

But thanks for the offer! GeorgeMoney (talk) 22:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I changed the notice on the page. And about the local js file, i'll give you instructions to do it. This is assuming you're on firefox, windows, and your default program files directory is c:\program files:

Go to "C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\chrome". Then create a file called "wikipedia.manifest" (assuming you have it set to show file extentions). In your .manifest file, put: content wikipedia file://c:/mydir/wikipediastuff/. Then put your monobook in your directory that you set in the manifest, and go to your monobook and put <script src="chrome://wikipedia/content/monobook.js"></script>. Some good things about having it local is changes go immediately, you don't have to hard-reload, just normal reload. And you don't flood recentchanges making edits to your monobook, and it loads faster.

Hope this helps! GeorgeMoney (talk) 23:11, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, i'm such an idiot! I forgot to put the document.write in the above code. Well, i'm glad you got it to work! GeorgeMoney (talk) 01:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

If you want to include more js files, you can add the document.write code that you put on my talkpage in your on-wiki monobook, or you can even add it to your chrome monobook. And on css, it works for css too, but chrome css files you have to restart the browser to see any changes (so with chrome js you only have to do a normal reload, but with chrome css it requires restarting firefox). If you do want to use CSS put in your monobook.css @import "chrome://wikipedia/content/monobook.css"; . GeorgeMoney (talk) 02:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Correct. GeorgeMoney (talk) 02:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for your Anti-Vandalism Barnstar! Proud to be a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit. —Sengkang 15:58, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

The template you're using

I'm not sure which template you used to warn 80.47.28.222 (talk · contribs), but I think you might want to take a look at it; the text is corrupted. Unless you wanted to call yourself a "twat". -Patstuart 17:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my page!

Thank you for reverting my userpage from vandalism faster than me! Have a nice day! J.J.Sagnella 18:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

GLEN!

Glen, you stole my block.

I was trying to do the "revert all" of that guy who linkspammed, but I got some message and I clicked okay, and then it gave me some prompt box, and I didn't know what to type so it aborted. Help, please? Nishkid64 23:49, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Hahaha. It was asking me a password? I thought it was asking me something else, so I was like typing numbers. Thanks, Glen. Nishkid64 23:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Re:Doctor Strange

May I know why me edits were reverted? Have you considered reading what I've removed or have you simply reveted without even taking a look? I suggest you read what I've just reverted. Get out of the auto-mode. 200.162.200.64 00:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Cool :) 200.162.200.64 01:01, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

G6P revert

I forgot to log in, but I edited the G6P page to remove the unnecessarily large infobox full of empty fields, but it got auto-reverted and I received a warning. I'll log in this time and do it again, but my edit was certainly not unhelpful. Thanks. 70.161.65.167 00:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Co mi zrobisz, jak mnie złapiesz?

Hi! Can u please take a look on this article? Why infobox isn't working? Szczur Zosia 11:46, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Mihai cartoaje

You replied after me but it should be noted the claims about mediation are not false. I went searching and found that the mediation cases did exist and in both cases he pulled out, the second of which wad closed because he was being uncooperative. –– Lid^(Talk) 13:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Just a note I am not involved in the dispute in any way, but after noticing his "attempts at intimidation" being timid to a high degree I did some back checking and his other claims seems to be attempts at drumming up support against these other editors. –– Lid^(Talk) 13:20, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Read my summaries

Pardon my rudeness, but I was not expirimenting in vandalism. I assume you are referring to my Tulsa, Oklahoma edit. I removed that section with the intention of shortening it. And for your information, I am not new, I know your so-called rules, so any edits I make are with the intention of adding to, or in general bettering an article. Roygene 16:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Roygene 16:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Redirects...

Okay, the redirect you created I can see is somewhat verifiable, though it seems uncommon. But, Spanish? I checked google] and quickly scanned a few dozen references online and none seem related at all, even the Urban Dictionary, which lets face it has every plausible definition (and implausible for that matter) has no refderecne to it (it did have Dutch) Where did it originate? Glen S 01:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh, well I got most of them from the talk page, I just figured the other people didn't have time to put it up yet. Spanish was mentioned by User:Kd5mdk and seconded by User:207.200.116.198. While I certainly wouldn't replace any existing article with such a redirect, since it was unused I figure that anyone looking that up would be redirected here, until anything better came along to be used with the term. I guess I should have looked it up first, but generally that's more something one does with making full articles or making major changes to major articles, right, not just redirects? In those cases, I thought it would make sense to direct any conceivable reference to the best chance of it's proper reference, even in cases of slang. Just not creating articles purely based on slang. Still, since you found nothing, no harm in it's loss I guess. Tyciol 18:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Pyrosummit.Admin

I honestly don't see why you blocked his username; it doesn't seem unacceptable or a breaking of wiki policy. His name is simply based on the title of the forums he made at http://www.pyrosummit.com .

-V - Sunday October 15, 2006, 12:18:04 PM

Vikedal 18:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Lorenzo Perosi

William Shakespeare ... widely regarded as the greatest writer of the English language,

Giuseppe Verdi ... the most influential composer of the (sic) 19th century Italian opera.

Leonardo da Vinci ... widely considered to be one of the greatest painters of all time and a universal genius.

Explain to me how those three examples (and there are many others) are allowed to stay on Wiki.

Secondly, I'd be curious to know how you obtained your expertise in Italian music at the turn of the last century, so much so that you "know" that Perosi was "not" the most popular (not one of the most popular, the most popular) sacred composer in Italy at that time.

Received via email from LorenzoPerosi1898 15 October, 2006

Reply

You said:

"Explain to me how those three examples (and there are many others) are allowed to stay on Wiki."

Easy:

• William Shakespeare ... widely regarded as the greatest writer of the English language,^{Shakespeare, William - Encyclopædia Britannica}

• Giuseppe Verdi ... the most influential composer of the (sic) 19th century Italian opera.^{Giuseppe Verdi - Encyclopædia Britannica}

• Leonardo da Vinci ... widely considered to be one of the greatest painters of all time and a universal genius.^{Leonardo da Vinci - - Encyclopædia Britannica}

The difference, which is being repeatedly pointed out to you is the above statements are verifiable by respected sources I would use Britannica to verify your claim of Perosi being "the most popular Italian composer of sacred music at the turn of the twentieth century" however they dont even have an article on him. Perhaps that tells you something?

You said:

"Secondly, I'd be curious to know how you obtained your expertise in Italian music at the turn of the last century, so much so that you "know" that Perosi was "not" the most popular (not one of the most popular, the most popular) sacred composer in Italy at that time."

I dont need to be an expert, all I need to do is find the verifiable opinions of the experts. Your opinion means nothing here (and nor does mine) - expressing your opinion that he is the most (anything) is a breach of WP:NPOV and WP:NOR.

Understand? Find a verifiable third party source that asserts he is the most popular, as in, #1, above all others, cite it and add it. Problem solved. :) Glen 08:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Aren't you over-reacting a bit?

Just because some vandal messed up your userpage, now you've got to block the only IP Address I can use? By blocking him you're just feeding into what he wants. --BLuToRsE 12:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

It's 70.91.248.249 --BLuToRsE 12:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Wait, you are kidding right?! Have you seen the amount of warnings that IP has on its talk page? Or did you miss the blanking of Lake Forest High School and the addition of pee pee poo poo stinky doo doo. PEACE BOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.

Note I would never simply block an IP for blanking anyone's user page (least of all mine), but that was also followed (on top of the vandalism above) with another disruptive edit, the addition of Category:LGBT Wikipedians to my user page?

I'd thank you to do a little research before telling an administrator that he is over-reacting. At the end of the day if there had been any productive edits coming from that anon then that would have made a difference. However, as you can clearly see here - thats far from the case. Glen 12:51, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

PS: I blocked anon only so it shouldnt have affected you anyway?

The computers at LFHS are a bit glitchy, and it takes a REALLY long time to log in, so it's more convinient not to. But yeah, there is a lot of vandalism from that range. I thought you were simply blocking it for the "Settle Down Bucko" message. --BLuToRsE 22:47, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

User:LorenzoPerosi1898

You're very welcome. His inept (and false) attempt to label you a sockpuppet master certainly rose to the level of vandalism in my opinion. I initially blocked him for a week, but reduced it to 48 hours on further review. Let me know if you get further problems from him after he returns from the block. Best, Gwernol 14:56, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Re:B-day

Thanks, Glen. I guess some fruit is good for you. :-p (I hate fruit lol; maybe that's why I'm gonna die of a heart attack) Nishkid64 19:46, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Sock accusations

I think you would have noticed by now, but just in case you haven't LorenzoPerosi1898 (talk • contribs) is accusing you of sockpuppetry and vandalism on his talk page as well as in emails (which I gather he is sending around to many others).--Konst.able 21:47, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

This has to be a joke. I couldn't find a sockpuppet connection to Glen and Grover cleveland if my life depended on it. Their editing trends are completely different, and if they were the same preson, why would Glen bother posting on the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents board as Grover cleveland asking for LorenzoPerosi1898 to be blocked when he could just do it himself, as Glen? Aside from a few minor instances where their paths crossed - one acting as editor, the other as an admin, there is zero evidence to support this ludicrous claim. This a senseless waste of Wikipedia resources. If there's any help I can give Glen - let me know! Yankees76 22:07, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism by 24.181.67.188

Hi, Glen. I notice you left a warning at 24.181.67.188's talk page. If you check the User contributions, you'll see this user is still continuously vandalizing by putting nonsense on pages, and is reverting back when removed. Rizzleboffin 23:03, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

134.7.248.137 vandalism

Hi Glen. 134.7.248.137 is the IP number for the whole of Curtin University, a large university in Western Australia. I think that you should ban this IP, as people at this university are using this IP to vandalise anonymously. I'm assuming that if you banned the IP, people at Curtin would still be able edit Wiki if the logged in from their own accounts.The Kasparov of Sheshbesh 05:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Georg Forster

As the article is Today's featured article, I have unprotected it again and am watching it closely. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 10:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Glen, can you take a look at these user contributions?

[14] He (maliciously, I think) added copyvio tags to that image. I'm not quite sure how to revert it. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 10:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Excellent! I wasn't sure if you were still around. I haven't done much with images, and I didn't know how to fix it. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 10:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

BTW...I actually reported Totalpower to WP:AIV because he appeared to be connecting through an open proxy. (Every ' in his edited documents was backslashed). -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 10:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, just one more followup, partly for my own education. This IP was part of that same copyvio nonsense: [15] I reported him to both WP:OP and WP:AIV. I suspect the admin who reviewed it in WP:AIV declined to block because he hadn't been warned...but it was my understanding that open proxies are blocked on sight...normal vandalism warning rules don't apply. Or am I mistaken? -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 11:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Culverin

You can unblock him if you want, I think that enough time has elapsed. And thanks for the message on my talk page. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 14:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 16th.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 42	16 October 2006	About the Signpost

Wikipedia partially unblocked in mainland China	$100 million copyright fund stems discussion
Floyd Landis adopts "the Wikipedia defense" as appeal strategy	News and notes: Logo votes begin, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Mediators needed!

Hiya! I'm contacting you because you're listed on Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal as "willing to accept assigned cases" if you find it interesting. Well, we've got a bit of a backlog, and I was wondering if you'd look over the current list of new cases (I've copied it here for convenience) and tell me if you'd take any of them? I'd really appreciate it! :D

• 2006-10-07 Advocates for Children in Therapy
• 2006-10-07 Joe Sharkey
• 2006-10-08 BSA
• 2006-10-08 Nicole Kidman
• 2006-10-09 Hinduism
• 2006-10-09 Vittorio Emanuele, Prince of Naples
• 2006-10-10 Udit Raj
• 2006-10-12 Sweetest Day
• 2006-10-13 Scott Davis and Miami,Queensland
• 2006-10-13 Unification Church
• 2006-10-14 Personal attacks
• 2006-10-14 U.S. Roads naming fallout
• 2006-10-16 Deletions by user Kdbuffalo
• 2006-10-16 Turkmenistan
• 2006-10-16 Vigile.net as a source

I think you might be interested in the Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-08-05 LTTE case also. There's no mediator, though they've been discussing things for a while, so the case is marked as "open" and not in the above list. Thanks again! ~Kylu (u|t) 22:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

NZ Knights

Behold. In all its power!

The NZ Knights cant lose with a new spooning tactic. I would like to see Archie Thompson withstand the power of the wooden spoon.

'Culverin? ^Talk 07:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

lol! Glen 07:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Bwahahahahaha....

People? You mean, "Sheeple" 09:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Your fans :)

I didn't know if you wanted me to reply here or not, but thanks for semi-protecting my page! I'm just glad he was blocked. Serves him right for messing with us (and everybody esle at Wikipedia ^^). Keep up the great work as well and happy editing! Sasuke-kun27 18:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Un-protection Request

Hey, how's it going? I think I'm ready to have my page un-protected. I don't think that the vandal will be bothering me any time soon. If he does come back and vandalize again, even though you'd think that these vandals will learn after the first time they're blocked, I'll give you the privilege of blocking him yourself (if you want to, of course ^^). Happy Editing! Sasuke-kun27 19:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar!

Thank you; I appreciate that. I really ought to make a real user page one of these days so I have a place to keep it.

I've been thinking that there must be an easier way to revert vandalism and post warnings. Can I assume that you recommend WP:VandalProof? -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 19:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

User:LorenzoPerosi1898

Glen,

I am opening a WP:RFCU in this case as I believe that we need to establish one way or the other if there is any basis for User:LorenzoPerosi1898's accusations. I do not believe a word of what this user is saying, and I firmly hope that the CheckUser shows that you are nothing to do with User:Grover cleveland. If the check user shows this, I will personally push for a community ban on User:LorenzoPerosi1898 as I believe this sort of accusation cannot be allowed to stand. Best, Gwernol 20:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Fine, there here's the evidence you're all clamoring for. You kept asking for it:

I received this e-mail from GlenSWiki@email.com:

You fucking homophobe! you think you can even TRY to get me booted from here? i'll fry your ass you cocksucker!!!

I received this e-mail from CleveGrove@mail.com:

You fucking homophobe! you think you can even TRY to get me booted from here? i'll fry your ass you cocksucker!!!

Coincidence? For further evidence (which I knew you'd want), I spent three hours last night trying to guess what password such a vitriolic individual might use. I tried many, and indeed, "fuckperosi" is the password for both GlenSWiki@email.com and CleveGrove@mail.com Needless to say, both cleared their mailboxes, outgoing and incoming, hoping to erase any evidence. However, I have the timestamps ... In closing, you can all demote Don Lorenzo Perosi till the end of time. He's been dead fifty years -- how do you expect to succeed in doing so? LorenzoPerosi1898 20:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Glen, I've opened the RFCU at [16]. Good luck, Gwernol 20:23, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

That's your evidence? I was expecting something with matching IP addresses at the very least. If you have the emails still, you should have IP addresses - a simple check would reveal right away if Glen was doing this or not. Yankees76 20:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Glen, you're very welcome. Looks like the user opened up a couple of free email accounts, emailed himself the "worst" email he could think of from both and is trying to use that as proof. I sincerely hope the CheckUsers decide to take the RFCU. Clearing this up quickly and efficiently will allow everyone to move on from this sorry incident. Good luck, Gwernol 20:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh my, that's pretty hilarious. He might have put a little more effort into covering his tracks... Gwernol 20:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, I thought he was smart enough to realize he was on the edge of WP:3RR but he just reverted for a fourth time today, so has been blocked again for a lenient 24 hours (considering his history). Gwernol 21:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh

Lol, yeah, that was me, i was making a new userbox and something went wrong, I wasn't logged in for some reason. Tanks!!!!!--Whytecypress 23:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Along with me?! You are Timmy12 too?

It's nuts! Thank you for letting me know. I thought there were procedures or something but I guess not. Mattisse(talk) 00:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Pshnonubs05

Whaddaya think about this one's unblock request? Maybe reduce from indef? Looks like it's been about three days, so far; if they're still around, it must not be a throwaway account, at least. Luna Santin 06:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you Glen for moving my comment. Harold Kewell 08:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Incorrectly Blocked User!

Glen I believe you did see the information about the user Harry Kewell 14 being blocked for impersonating himself while you were posting the messege regarding Jimbo Wales. If you did not I would appriciate it if you had a look on my page and my talk page and possibly there is some further information on Harry Kewell 14 talk page.

Kind Regards Harold Kewell 09:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Follow Up!

No offense but I believe I know what happend regarding the situation at hand, it's pretty straight forward. Most times the user in question was not on my I.P. Why would I joke on such a serious matter.

Kind Regards Harold Kewell 09:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Harry Kewell 14

Sorry about my other messege I did not get your pervious messege when writting it. Any way the user Harry Kewell 14 was blocked regarding impersonation of Harry Kewell the English and Australian football player. The thing is he is the real football player and that means he was blocked for impersonating himself.

Kind regards Harold Kewell 09:25, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Wrong Birthday

I did get your messege regarding the following up and also the wrong birthday. Just F.Y.I. the birthday Harry isn't the greatest with computers and often has a reputation to make typos and didn't often look at his user page the birthday date was probabley one of those typos.

Kind regards Harold Kewell 09:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Re:Block

Which one did you mean? The new Harry or the guy alleging to be "Tawker's bot"?--Konst.able^Talk 10:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Bad evil sockpuppet master rogue admin removing defamation warning notices :P--Konst.able^Talk 10:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks :)--Konst.able^Talk 11:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

PI ETA Consulting Company

Thanks for the headsup. Btw, don't subst {{Deleted}} or else DumbBot can't see it and we can't redelete the mainspace-polluting template after the threat has passed. Just add a long comment tag to it to prevent its appearance in Special:Shortpages. Kinda like I did here. - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

WP:RFA/Cynical

Thank you for contributing to my RFA. Unfortunately it failed (final tally 26/17/3). As a result of the concerns raised in my RFA, I intend to undergo coaching, get involved in the welcoming committee and try to further improve the quality of my contributions to AFD and RFA. All the best. Cynical 14:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Template:ScientologySeries

Sorry, I just saw that you were not the one sneaking in template changes without prior discussion, but someone before you. That page had been subject to vandalism and WP:POV violations to an extent that I decided to switch from "Reader" to "Editor" and shot the wrong guy. Sorry. Makoshack 16:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

lol that's ok, I do try not to "sneak" in my vandalising! One question; where the hell am I meant to reply to you??! No, all I did was tidy it, I made zero additions nor subtractions Glen 16:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: PI ETA Consulting Company

Glen S wrote:

Just an FYI: After 3 attempts this user was finally blocked, however, shortly thereafter tried again as User:PI ETA Consulting Company which I had already blocked for their username before I saw the above. They're now back again as User:PE Con Co, however, I have taken these measures already. Glen 13:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks – Gurch 19:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Heads up on POV user

Hi Glen. The Laura Betterly article was majorly revised yesterday in an extremely POV way. I have added the original content back, but have encorporated the new data which is npov into the article. I hope this editor quickly learns wikipedia policy so we don't get into edit wars.--Fahrenheit451 01:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks :)

Thanks for the barnstar - it's nice to get your work noticed once in a while :-) Here's a little prezzy back --Casper2k3 04:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Re:Hey...

Huh? Are you talking about the indefblock notice I put on the userpage that you subsequently deleted? And whose phone number is it lol? Nishkid64 02:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. Sorry, I just have a habit of tagging indefblock to pages that haven't already been tagged. It's just a pet peeve of mine to see a indef blocked user but no notice. And what do you mean about the "administrators phone numbers"? Nishkid64 03:09, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Fred's an admin?? Lol...maybe that's why I was confused. I thought it was just some guy advertising his phone number. Nishkid64 03:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• FYI, I just put in and already had processed a username change for that telephone number vandal to a generic name, thanks for the deletes was just going to do them! — xaosflux ^Talk 04:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the heads up, I'll be on the lookout for anyothers. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Erm...you could have just removed the convo if you wanted. What's with the deletion? Nishkid64 04:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

K no problem, it was just weird to see a deletion log for my user talk page. Nishkid64 04:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

CheckUser result

Glen, I'm exceptionally glad this was resolved. I have indef blocked User:LorenzoPerosi1898 since it is now obvious that this user has been falsifying evidence to discredit you, Grover cleveland and other editors in good standing. I'm sorry you had to put up with Lorenzo's nonsense whne you were properly executing your duties as an admin. Best, Gwernol 04:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

You're very welcome. I'm so glad there was nothing to the allegations he made, as I always suspected would be the case. He was not a classic troll, but rather an editor who was so blinded by his belief in his own position that he was willing to spin any lie, however vicious and unfounded to support his belief system. Wikipedia is better off without such people. Good luck, Gwernol 04:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

In the meantime, you might want to confiscate the email addresses posted above. I've already taken control of clevegrove@mail.com - which you might be interested to know, was only created on October 18. Interesting how he spent 3 hours (the night before) hacking an email address that hadn't even been created yet. If anyone wants, I'd be happy to hand the address over now that the case is settled. Yankees76 05:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh yes he did - at least with the clevegrove one, "your" address doesn't seem to work for me. I'm glad everything turned out okay though. Cheers! Yankees76 05:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Changing username

Did you put the name you wanted changed somewhere for the 'crat processing that to find it? — xaosflux ^Talk 04:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Busy?

I understand if you are, however if you aren't, and have access to IRC, I'd love to have a chat about some things. (I'm back, by the way, and thanks for dealing with Culverin). Daniel.Bryant 07:05, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey Glen!

Boy! That was quick! I tried to create User:Nikos_Silver and User:Niko_Silver on my own, and then post the {{doppelganger}}, but you blocked my IP! Kindly unblock me, and paste it yourself clearing those other intimidating templates! Sorry if I did something wrong. (Did I?) PS. I had to log in through my cell-phone to get a non blocked IP! •NikoSilver• 12:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Ha, thanks (still on the cell for now). Can I remove the tags from the talk? Also, do I need to create the account properly, or can I just do it as NikoSilver? (for the second one) •NikoSilver• 13:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Sure ya can - they were blocked to protect you after all! Yes, definitely create them as you, then we can see and wont block them :) Glen 13:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Done and done. •NikoSilver• 13:07, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Re my last 'experience', maybe you'd be interested in this: Wikipedia_talk:Sock_puppetry#Re:_doppelganger. Kindly comment! •NikoSilver• 13:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Blocking User:131.247.221.52

Hello. I see you blocked this user a few days ago. Well, his block has expired and aparently he hasn't learned a thing. I reverted one of his vandalisms and he proceeded to vandalize my talk page.[17] Thanks for your work!--WilliamThweatt 12:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

That was fast! Thanks again.--WilliamThweatt 15:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Two Horned

That's the third 3RR violation on the same page in 4 days. Two Horned still doesn't seem to recognize that he has violated 3RR. He needs time to re-evaluate his editing approach. Jayjg ^(talk) 14:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, your response to him put it better than I did. Jayjg ^(talk) 14:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello User:Glen_S. About my block request, before blocking me, you should watch a little bit more carefully what's happening with Hkelkar and his numerous alter-egos in the Koenraad_Elst page: a one and same person uses different identies to evade 3RR. And I'm the one blocked. Try to be balanced. Okay, I know you don't care. You're just here to apply blindly 3RR violation without checking what's happening with a user like Hkelkar . Just try to count how many blocking requests this user tries to achieve under different identities. Just try. I could also use many identies to evade 3RR. I never do. Thanks. TwoHorned 15:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC).

Very strange. No explanation, sorry. Jayjg ^(talk) 15:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I see. His block expired 15 minutes before he made the comment. Jayjg ^(talk) 15:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, frankly, it's not very strange. What I am telling you both is I that Hkelkar is the same guy than Netaji (a well established puppet master user -see the warning on his user page-), which is probably the same guy than other I was talking with obn the Koenraad_Elst page. I am also telling you that Hkelkar does war-blocking under various identities. For cry out loud when will you understand ? TwoHorned 16:05, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

For catching the vandalism on my talk page. Much appreciated. --Kbdank71 15:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

I am an AOL user and you have blocked me saying i'm a Tdog?

Dear Glen,

I am an AOL user, and so share an IP number with lots of random people and you have blocked me saying i'm a Tdog or something like that?

Could you please unblock me and add the Fiat Linea seden to the list of Fiats cars.

thank you Xljesus 16:00, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

User:RPJ

You left a message on this guy's talk page about looking into his block, and asked Shell about it. I read your question and Shell's comment, and declined his unblock request; I think Shell has it right, and you seem to have moved on to other things. Hope I didn't step on your toes. Mangojuice^talk 17:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank You

For offering your opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Klausutis (third nomination). The article was deleted. "The quality of mercy is not strain'd . . . It is enthroned in the hearts of kings, It is an attribute to God himself; And earthly power doth then show likest God's, When mercy seasons justice." ~ Wm. Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice, Act IV Scene 1. Morton devonshire 22:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Ann Coulter

Hi, I went and reverted the vandal IP's edits because they were accurate on that article, I also added a valid source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.247.196.110 (talk • contribs)

Don't you mean because they were not accurate? --Sasuke-kun27 23:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For exemplary action and keeping a cool head in a difficult situation. Doing the right thing there rid us of a pest. Well done. Guinnog 23:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Not at all, it is a small recognition of the integrity and level-headedness with which you dealt with the incident. --Guinnog 00:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Billy Madison

Hello.

Thank you for the welcome message. I was wondering if you could help me with a problem. Earlier today (Oct 21st) I edited the 'Billy Madison' page. At the time I was not a registered user. I made significant changes to the plot section because I felt that it was poorly written and confusing, as well as innacurate. However, when I returned to look at the page again, I noticced that it had been reverted to its previous incarnation because the user who had changed it believd I had added unneccessary spoilers. I changed the page back to what I had written.

However, I don't want to get involved in any editing war or anything like that. Is there a way I can get in contact with the user who edited the page so I can discuss it with him?

Thank you. Dr. Deathface 05:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

I hate to ask, but how to you leave a descriptive edit summary thingy? Dr. Deathface 05:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

thanks heaps. if i knew how do give you an award or whatever, i would. Dr. Deathface 05:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Question

I need you to do something for me (don't worry, it's not controversial or ). Any chance you could duck into #Wikipedia for a minute or two? - it will only take that long. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 09:50, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Can you delete the redirect from the move? Daniel.Bryant 12:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Autobot

So what the fuck is Autobot, anyway? Reply to this talk page, and not this IP's because it's AOL and I won't get your response anyway. Cheers yo... --207.200.116.201 10:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, not really so much a bot per se. More an IRC automated blocking script. Blocks when detecting preset words. Been working on it awhile and is getting more and more efficient. Best thing is it goes even while I sleep... Why so curious? Glen 10:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Just thought it was an interesting name. I hadn't seen it before, so I thought I'd ask. --207.200.116.201 10:46, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Cool... well Im the only one who actually has mine declaring its existance in the block summary... but Im sure you'll hear a lot more about them in coming weeks :) Have a cool weekend Glen... on SKIS!!!!!!! 10:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

You too man. And for the record, Luna really DID give me the hiccups. This didn't start til he blocked my pagemove name. Karma I suppose, but more like on rollerblades...  :-) --207.200.116.201 10:51, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Luna says a glass on water, but I reckon stand on your head. Don't do both or you'll drown! Glen 10:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

PS; You sign your posts correctly, impressed!

PPS; I always thought skis had two "i"s?! Learn something new everyday...

Surprising as it may be, I actually spellcheck my vandalism before implementing it. Tell Luna his idea worked. No more hiccups, yay!!! --207.200.116.201 11:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Daniel.Bryant wants one more db-author...

...just kidding. Thanks for all your deleting!

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For deleting an absolute mountain of my subpages on request, I award you this Tireless Contrubutor Barnstar. Daniel.Bryant 14:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry!

I appologize for any vandalism. How do I use the "sandbox"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.40.241 (talk • contribs) 16 October, 2006

---

SORRY

soory glen i didnt know we wernt alloud to tlak to each other i tryed to make changes i though were apropriate to a page but i still got told of for vandilisind how do u use the sandbox

The Thunda From Downunda 04:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Howdy Glen

Thanks for your quick feedback on my Kevin Roberts entry. Which is also my absolute first entry. I am loving this so far. Much to learn. I have also Wikipedia-"email" you and of course I don't know if it will get to your outside world email account or wikipedia email account?

Thanks – Kempton 17:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC) "ideas are the currency of the future" - Kevin Roberts 16:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Re User:85.160.87.235

Thanks for your help with User:85.160.87.235! Reverting individual edits takes ages. :) --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 16:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Happy to help ...

and many thanks for the barnstar! Now, let me find somewhere nice for it to go ... Regards, Mr Stephen 16:55, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

IWonderWhatWentWrong

...has been blocked indefinitely. That's really tacky to request an unblock and then immediately start vandalizing. NawlinWiki 17:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Zach

Sorry Glen i didn't know how to use this and i wanted to see if it actually worked. My apoligies again.

Please message back to give me more information on how wikipedia works. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Johnnoble (talk • contribs) 19:41, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry Glen mate if this gets a bit personal but i was wondering how wikipedia has got so much information on it. Is it purely done by people who use the site or is it done by the creators of the sites. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Johnnoble (talk • contribs) 19:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC) (UTC)

Thanks for the information.

'Jay-Ceez' Noble 20:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

See i'm learning already. lol.

U2

'Jay-Ceez' Noble 20:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

I was just about to start a new article but i can't see how. I want to make it for the BBC series Big cat week. Can you help me?

Thanks for the help

Thanks for the help Glen. You help on formating Kevin Roberts was much appreciated.

Cheers, Kempton "Ideas are the currency of the future." - Kevin Roberts 00:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

RE: Islam Remark

Okay, now I realize it wasen't you who wrote that. I don't know how it pretains to me, however. Anyhow don't feel bad, the majority of Wikipedia users can't read Arabic anyway. :) --HP 50g 00:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

I have translated it using an online translator and it does mean "death to Islam"--Konst.able^Talk 05:47, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

ok

Ok no problem. Just had to get that off my chest. I've been harrassed beyond belief on here this last week! Annamisa 05:23, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

3RR defiance

You may want to read the response from a user you blocked for 3RR, and do what you feel is needed/warranted. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 11:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

thanks for protecting Homophobia

it needs it. r b-j 14:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)