Hiya Funkygishh (talk) 13:29, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Funkygishh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

I would recommend you read Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest before creating any new articles. Deb (talk) 17:57, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Peltsman for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peltsman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peltsman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. agtx 18:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Stefan-Pierre Tomlin for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stefan-Pierre Tomlin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan-Pierre Tomlin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FiendYT 05:00, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Elisheva Levy

edit

Hello, Funkygishh. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Elisheva Levy, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Elisheva Levy to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Owlsmcgee (talk) 03:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

The same issue with Robert Sheffield (gallerist). It has no sources at all, and for living people there not only need to be clear sources, they need to be WP:INLINECITED. This has 'external links' which means 'friendly suggestions for further reading' - did you actually mean this as your sources? Please ping/message me if I can be of any help. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
I've moved the unreferenced biographies of living people to draftspace [1]. Please resubmit via WP:AFC. Boleyn (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
You've moved unreferenced/unclearly referenced biographies of living people, like Georgina Adam, back from draftspace without addressing the issue or engaging in discussion. Please see WP:BURDEN and WP:Communication is required. Please add clear sources. Boleyn (talk) 16:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

WP:ANI

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 12:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Swarm 19:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply