Archives: 1 | 2

thank you edit

I really appreciate that acknowledgement. I have spent much more time than I can afford trying to improve some of these articles. --Gilabrand 14:20, 21 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hibernation edit

Is your hibernation over? IZAK 08:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

kind of, will be back on the saddle soonish. you ready for this? ;) frummer

Speedy deletion of Eyal Hertzog edit

 

A tag has been placed on Eyal Hertzog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 16:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Thoof edit

 

A tag has been placed on Thoof requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornixtalk 04:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Holocaust123.JPG edit

 

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Image:Holocaust123.JPG, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at [[Talk:Image:Holocaust123.JPG|its talk page]]. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Lisa Donovan edit

I have nominated Lisa Donovan, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Donovan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. RogueNinjatalk 08:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can you please take a look there please. Thanks.  Sunderland06  18:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Fair use rationale for Image:Novaright.PNG edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Novaright.PNG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Allegations of Israeli Apartheid? edit

currently there is a vote going on in removing allegations of an israeli apartheid. i would appreciate your opinion on this matter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Allegations_of_Israeli_apartheid_%288th_nomination%29Wikifan12345 (talk) 23:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seven Laws of Noah edit

This article is not a featured article, so cannot be reviewed at WP:FAR; I've removed the listing. If your intent was to list it at WP:FAC and if you need help in moving the page and re-listing it correctly, pls let me know. I suggest a peer review first, as the article does not look FAC ready and would not be likely to pass without further work on citations, prose, and listiness at least. (Tips for a successful peer review can be found at WP:FCDW/March 17, 2008). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:John bait 08.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:John bait 08.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter edit

This newsletter was automatically delivered by ShepBot because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) on 04:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Allegations of apartheid deletion notification edit

Some time ago, you participated in a deletion discussion concerning Allegations of Israeli apartheid. I thought you might like to know that the parent article, Allegations of apartheid, was recently nominated for deletion. Given that many of the issues that have been raised are essentially the same as those on the article on which you commented earlier, you may have a view on whether Allegations of apartheid should be kept or deleted. If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination). -- ChrisO (talk) 18:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter edit

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 02:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Judaism Newsletter edit

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique[approves|this|message] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:03, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Judaism Newsletter edit

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique[approves|this|message] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:14, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tag at Palin article edit

Would you please remove the "Toolong" tag that you placed at the top of the Palin article? The article is not too long, as discussed at the talk page.[1]Ferrylodge (talk) 20:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Israel edit

Hi FrummerThanThou! As part of the memberlist 'cleanup' process on WikiProject Israel, I am sending you this message to ask whether you still wish to be active on the project (not having edited Israel-related articles in a reasonably long time). The project appreciates your past contributions and would like to see you editing its articles again :) Also, I personally urge you to watch the project and talk page in order to be involved in project discussions. On the other hand, if you no longer have an interest in this project, please let me know. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 18:29, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Messianic Judaism related deletion edit

An article who voted on in the past concerning to delete it or not, has been recreated and nommed for deletion see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignatz Lichtenstein 3rd nom --Joseph3333 (talk) 21:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron edit

  Hello, FrummerThanThou. Based on the templates on your talk page, please consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. You can join >> here <<.

Ikip (talk) 17:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:LisaNova.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:LisaNova.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:Shugart.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Shugart.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:Yacht123.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Yacht123.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of World Jewry edit

I have nominated World Jewry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ryan Delaney talk 00:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

== File:File:Yisroel Dovid Weiss.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:File:Yisroel Dovid Weiss.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. File:Yisroel Dovid Weiss.jpg Thecheese999 (talk) 05:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC) --Thecheese999 (talk) 05:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC) ==Reply

File:File:Yisroel Dovid Weiss.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:File:Yisroel Dovid Weiss.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. File:Yisroel Dovid Weiss.jpg Thecheese999 (talk) 05:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC) --Thecheese999 (talk) 05:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


File copyright problem with File:Schiff2.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Schiff2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 11:05, 3 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Mary G. Enig edit

I have nominated Mary G. Enig, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary G. Enig. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Orange Mike | Talk 03:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Holocaust123.JPG edit

Hi - I have a question about File:Holocaust123.JPG, which you uploaded in 2006. What do you know about its provenance - where it was taken, when it was taken, and by whom? And do we know anything about the deceased shown in it? It's currently used as the lead image in The Holocaust, but this choice is being discussed at length at Talk:The Holocaust. I think it needs some specific identifying data to satisfy WP:IMAGE. Many thanks, Lfh (talk) 12:23, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello FrummerThanThou! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Eyal Hertzog - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Coopers poynt family school edit

hi its sad to see kids like this it touched my heart god bless who ever its reading this amen when u look for god none of this things happen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.117.205.130 (talk) 20:25, 26 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Good article listed at Redirects for discussion edit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Good article. Since you had some involvement with the Good article redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Magioladitis (talk) 22:58, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Enschedefire2.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Enschedefire2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.--Martin H. (talk) 16:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:AlexanderBarkashov.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:AlexanderBarkashov.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.--Martin H. (talk) 16:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Russiannenazis.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Russiannenazis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.--Martin H. (talk) 16:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems edit

See above for the cleanup and see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yisroel Dovid Weiss.jpg for a problem. It looks like you uploaded many files with false licensing claims, it would be very nice if you can now, years after mistake, undertake some efforts to clean up the mess. Thanks. --Martin H. (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Enschedefire2.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Enschedefire2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:12, 11 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 19:12, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Zoep edit

 

The article Zoep has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software. No references. Tagged for notability since September 2009.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lead too short edit

 Template:Lead too short has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mkativerata (talk) 20:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

contact edit

p — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.153.227.126 (talk) 09:24, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello FrummerThanThou

We would like to use your picture from your site (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kingdom_5KR.jpg) for a book we are making!

Can you let me know if there are any costs for using you picture? We can also mention your name as owner of the picture. Do you have an idea of the resolution of the picture?

I’m looking forward to your reply!

Viola 37.153.227.126 (talk) 09:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

There is a new WikiProject you may be interested in edit

  This is a form letter sent out to members of WikiProject Lead section cleanup.

I am contacting you because you are listed as a participant of the now defunct WikiProject Lead section cleanup. I have created a new WikiProject, WikiProject Lede Improvement Team (name subject to change), that likely has the same goals as the project that you signed up for was supposed to have. If improving the lede sections of articles is something you are still interested in, please stop by and add yourself as a participant. As well, if you have any thoughts regarding your previous experience with lede section cleanup, please stop by and share them. Thank you,  DiscantX 08:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:EyeWiki.JPG edit

 

The file File:EyeWiki.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:EliezerWaldenberg.jpg edit

 

The file File:EliezerWaldenberg.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome Back edit

Hey Frummer,

Although we have never edited before, welcome back to Wikipedia!

p.s. This RSN may interest you:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Another_unreliable_Haaretz_article155.246.151.38 (talk) 00:34, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:EliezerWaldenberg.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EliezerWaldenberg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:29, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Zoho.com edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zoho.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Oaktree b (talk) 21:28, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey edit

Did you create youtube.fandom.com (Youtube wiki, now Wikitubia)? TommyOrVarnt (talk) 13:54, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I checked the Global Fandom but there is no user account. I fix this in The Wiki Wiki Fandom about Wikitubia. 47.234.198.142 (talk) 05:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply