This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I removed the IP's latest request on BLP grounds, and removed your response as well when I did so. I didn't want to remove your comment without reaching out, however, so if you have an issue with the removal I can readd it and selectively redact the IP's message. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:09, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for your help in catching another GeraldFord1980 sock. I've been watching your work anonymously from my IP address, and you've inspired me to become a Wikipedia editor myself. I doubt I'll ever been as good as you, but I sure am going to try. Kudos on a job well done.InformalDude (talk) 20:45, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I don't understand what is the specific reason for your rollback of my edits on the Vishnu page on 14:48, 4 August 2021โ. The edits are clearly Wiki page internal linkage. โWikiLinuz (talk) 18:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
@FormalDude: But, the specific words like "supreme being" or "avatar" or "cosmic" have very specific meaning in Hinduism. I don't see these as over internal linking. I can understand why this might be an issue in cases where the matter is trivial, but I don't see that in this case. โWikiLinuz (talk) 19:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
@WikiLinuz, that's a good point, I guess I didn't look closely enough, sorry. There were a couple words that were linked twice, and policy is to only the link the word the first time it appears in article article, and not link it for any subsequent appearances. I'll restore your edits though.
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
help me to make an sony cyber shot w800 real page please โย Preceding unsigned comment added by AndLikeThings (talk โข contribs) 22:41, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
@AndLikeThings: Sure, I'd be happy to try and help. You can get started at Draft:Cyber-shot DSC-W800. That is a draft page so it can be edited freely without risk of deletion, and eventually can be submitted as an article for creation.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Purple Barnstar
For not letting yourself get pushed around when editors try to intimidate. Your unwavering commitment to the project is an inspiration. Keep up the good work.--Shibbolethink(โโ) 02:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
/* G */ Submitting Grid Dynamics for an article to be created
Latest comment: 2 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
Hi FormalDude,
I am aware of the conflict of interest issue, but I am confused.
I submitted the article to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies/F-L so that a third party can write it (and also because my writing skills would fail me in every attempt). But the submission itself was marked as a conflict of interest?
Hi! I only put that message there in order to familiarize you with Wikipedia COI policies. So far you seem to have done a great job following them.
I removed your request for article creation because all requests must contain reliable, independent, third party sources, and press releases, the company's website, social media sites, and blogs are not reliable, independent sources. I'd like to see at least one strong reliable independent source for the company before accepting an article for creation request on it. ย ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐น๐ธ 19:47, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
It is difficult to find an independent source, seeing as most news about us are our own PRs. However, I am sure Forrester is a reliable and independent source. However, their article about us is locked behind a pricy paywall. Regardless, my question to you is if this is a strong source that you are looking for? Thanks again for your help AGridDynamicsMarketingSpecialist (talk) 20:46, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
@AGridDynamicsMarketingSpecialist: Yes, it does look like Forrester is reliable and independent. It has been used in other articles as a reliable source. A source being behind a paywall is not necessarily a reason not to use it. I would approve your new article for creation request if you submit it with that source. Happy to help! ย ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐น๐ธ 20:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
I was there myself not too long ago, so I definitely know what you mean! Thanks for being accepting of Wikipedia's processes and policies, which I know can sometimes be tedious (to say the least). ย ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐น๐ธ 21:04, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
edit request
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, thanks for the request, are you coming to me because I evaluated a previous edit request of yours? If so, what article was it for?
I've responded to the two edit requests you listed above, unfortunately I was not able to accept them since they did not have any new information. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 04:06, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
responded, and placed the reasons anyway. 49.228.224.219 (talk) 04:19, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Warning
Latest comment: 2 years ago28 comments3 people in discussion
Hi @FormalDude:, Hope you are safe there. If any new IP or Registered user had add any company website or other links to the external links section if presented on BLP on their first edit then what and which level of warning should we consider. Damak15 (talk) 09:59, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
FormalDude, For example if any new user add www.facebook.com in external links section on BLP then we would consider it as a spam1. Please give exact answerDamak15 (talk) 10:22, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
If they did it on their second edits then which level of warning should we considerย ? As they didn't receive any other warning level.Damak15 (talk) 11:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
It'd be helpful if you could tell me the username of the editor in question.
We would only bump the warning up from spam1 if they had already been warned before on their talk page recently. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 11:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
No username beacuse I have read WP:WARN and i want to be more clarify so i ask you these question is just example. It means we should give spam1, if they did it on 2nd edit as well but they didn't receive any level of warning. Thank youย !Damak15 (talk) 11:21, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
If I'm understanding your question correctly, Damak15, generally, you should give level one warnings if there are no warnings posted on their talk page. There can be exceptions to this, such as if the vandalism is so serious it can not possibly be good faithed. (talk page stalker)Justiyaya 11:36, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
I've noticed that none of your edits are automated, consider installing twinkle or redwarn for easy reverting and warning. Justiyaya 11:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Justiyaya: Hope you are fine. This is my question If any new IP or Registered user had add any company website or other links to the external links section if presented on BLP on their first edit then what and which level of warning should we consider.Damak15 (talk) 11:43, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Justiyaya:, Spam level 1 or vandalism1.Damak15 (talk) 11:48, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Damak15 Sorry about the late reply, but in this situation use Spam level 1 Justiyaya 12:02, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Justiyaya No worries. If they did it on second or tenth edit then which level should we use. Damak15 (talk) 12:08, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Damak15 If there are no warnings posted on the talk page of the user, always start with a level one warning, then, every time you deside to warn the user, increase the level of the warning. Justiyaya 12:18, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Justiyaya, Lastly, If there is an vandalism in WP:MOS. In WP:MOS what type of vandalism we see.Damak15 (talk) 12:23, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Damak15: (My previous responce was probably too harsh) I don't really understand your question, are you referring to vandalism in WP:MOS, MOS violations are generally not considered vandalism Justiyaya 14:32, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Justiyaya: Sorry for my late response. If we don't follow the MOS rules, then it should be consider vandalism or not. Please clarify with strong reason.Damak15 (talk) 15:19, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Damak15 MOS violations are (in most cases) not vandalism Justiyaya 15:22, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Justiyaya:, In your point of view, please tell me the cases where there is a vandalism. Damak15 (talk) 15:26, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Justiyaya: and @FormalDude:, Thank you for your guidance. I will see the link you had provided. Bye for today.Damak15 (talk) 15:34, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Sources for Lalitaditya Muktapida
Latest comment: 2 years ago14 comments2 people in discussion
I added sources on Lalitaditya Muktapida. Ekdothinchaar (talk) 18:41, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Ekdothinchaar: We need a specific source that states the maximum land area in square kilometers occupied by Muktapida and in what year if it is to be included in the article. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 18:46, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Why are my replies not showing up? Ekdothinchaar (talk) 19:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
I found the problem- it was that I cannot paste text. Ekdothinchaar (talk) 19:23, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Let me type some good sources, Ekdothinchaar (talk) 19:23, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
โAl-Hind: The Making of Indo-Islamic Worldโ By Andrรฉ Wink
Annals of Tang Dynasty
Tarangini 4 of Rajatarangini by Kalhan
Profile of Lalitaditya Muktapida from Britannica.com
Exploits of Lalitaditya Muktapida
M.A. Stein. Kalhanaโs Rajtarangini A Chronicle of The Kings of Kashmir (Reprint 1979), Motilal Banarsidass 41-U.A, Bungalow Road, Delhi, 110007. Ekdothinchaar (talk) 19:32, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
So what is the maximum land area in square kilometers occupied, and where does the source state that? โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 19:41, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Full text of โRajatarangini of Kalhana - English - Jogesh Chandra Dutt Volumes 1 & 2โ
Kalhana (1147-1149); Rajatarangini.
Sheldon Pollock (2006). The Language of the Gods in the World of Men: Sanskrit, Culture, and Power in Premodern India, pp. 241-242.
Sunil Fotedar (June 1984). The Kashmir Series: Glimpses of Kashmiri Culture - Vivekananda Kendra, Kanyakumari (p. 57).
Book IV (p. 67-74)
Rajatarangini of Kalhana: Kings of Kashmira/Book V,p. 111
Kalhana, Rajatarangini, IV.367
The Sixteen Kingdom Chinese Book
Culture and Political History of Kashmir, Volume 1, P.N.K. Bamzai Ekdothinchaar (talk) 21:16, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
That's all very nice, but I don't have access to those sources and there do not have access to the information you want added to the article. Again, you'll need to state specifically the maximum land area (in square kilometers) occupied by Muktapida and in what year as supported by a reliable source. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 21:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Sorry for not answering your question, these state that Lalitaditya Muktapidaโs empire was 8 million square miles. Which in kilometers is 12874752 square miles, and when rounding is 13 million square kilometers. Ekdothinchaar (talk) 21:26, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Now I will cite where I found my information Ekdothinchaar (talk) 21:41, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Method for alerting users about DS
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hi FormalDude, I've been bumping into your edits in a few places and I appreciate your good work. I saw you recently alerted some editors to discretionary sanctions, but all 3 were already technically "aware". I encourage you to check out the awareness criteria in full but here's my method:
Check the user's talk page history with a search for the tag "discretionary sanctions alert". It's particularly important not to alert someone who has received an alert in the same topic area within the last year.
For users who are very active in the topic area but who haven't received an alert, I also check their contributions with the same tag search to see if they've alerted others. Doing so also satisfies the awareness criteria.
For users who don't match 1 or 2, but who are regulars at arbitration-related areas, I might check their Wikipedia namespace edits to see if they participated in any enforcement cases in the topic area recently (I have only rarely done this step).
It takes a little bit of time, but is, I think, worth it to avoid confronting other users with redundant bureaucracy. As an aside, the whole DS awareness/alert system is deeply broken, and I'm hopeful a fix is forthcoming. 20:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, @Firefangledfeathers! I didn't know what all counted as satisfying the awareness criteria exactly, I thought they had to be notified on their talk page, so I appreciate your explanation. I see where the users were notified now except for User:CycoMa, I'm still not seeing where they were already aware. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 20:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
You're welcome. I hope this doesn't put you off of alerting in general. I've seen an ArbE case get turned down b/c the user wasn't technically aware and it's bizarre. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 20:35, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Oh, I'm sorry! I haven't ever edited anything before. I'll look into that and change it. I'm his daughter and just thought it would be fun to add, and correct when the divorce was. Pieceratops (talk) 00:58, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, @Pieceratops, no worries! We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. I put some helpful information on your talk page that explains more. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or go to The Teahouse! โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 01:17, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 7
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Webull, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SEC.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi,
I'm not sure I understand your reply to my request for editing Ahmed Yassin's page.
My request was basic: The page describes Yassin's village as having been "ethnically cleansed." This is not factually correct and the source was not reliable.
One's position on Middle East politics is irrelevant here; factual representation of data is. The term "ethnically cleansed" has a very specific meaning and the situation
that led to the exile of residents from that village simply does not meet the criteria nor definition of ethnic cleansing. Wikipedia is a place for facts, not opinions.
Using a politically charged and inaccurate term does no good to either side in the Israeli-Arab dispute.
For the person who is pro-Palestinian, its inaccuracy destroys the credibility of any claim of unfair treatment, as the focus becomes shifted toward the misrepresentation, not the overall condition of the event.
For the person who is pro-Israel, its inaccuracy is yet another thorn in the side of truth.
For the person who is neutral, its inaccuracy is offensive simply because it is yellow journalism.
Rewriting this sentence to state the facts--"The village was emptied by the IDF during the 1948 war*"--preserves the integrity of all three of the above parties, none of whom benefit from editorializing the situation.
It should be noted that there is ample historical evidence that, while al-Jura was, indeed, slated for destruction by the IDF post-capture of the town, its residents had already vacated completely. Common and well-known practice by the Egyptian and Jordanian armies was to evacuate the residents with promises of their being permitted to return after the ethnic cleansing of the Jews had been completed by the victorious Arab armies.
I would urge you, no matter which of the three aforementioned groups you ally with, to reread the sentence as written. Then, study the available historical facts, read the accepted definition of the term "ethnic cleansing," and decide whether you are, in fact, inserting bias, unintentionally or otherwise. TO not do so reflects poorly not only on the pro-Palestinian, pro-Israel, and neutral parties but on your credibility as well.
Sincerely,
David Feder
DPBF58 (talk) 21:38, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi @DPBF58, thanks for reaching out. It sounds like you know a lot about this issue! I'm happy to clarify my response to your edit request at Talk:Ahmed Yassin.
Next Linked Data for Libraries LD4 Wikidata Affinity Group call: Wikidata Edit-a-thons highlighting Boston Rock City Edit-a-thon, Wikidata Comics Edit-a-thon, and Wiki-Relays [1], Aug 10th.
LD4 Wikibase Working Hour - Next steps after installing a Wikibase instance -- creating users, items, and properties. Friday, August 27th, 2021 / 1PM (time zone converter). Registration: Please fill in ZOOM Registration Link to register
Wikimania 2021, August 13 to 17, online event. On this page you can find a summary of sessions and community gatherings related to Wikidata and Wikibase.
Mismatch Finder: Finishing work on importing mismatches and moved on to building the API for retrieving mismatches from the mismatch store.
Added tags for all edits done through the UI to more easily distinguish them from edits made through tools and other means (phab:T236893)
Moved regular expression checking for constraints from the SPARQL endpoint to a dedicated service to make it faster and put less stress on the SPARQL endpoint (phab:T176312)
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://senate.utah.gov/about-the-senate, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. โ Diannaa (talk) 12:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
@Diannaa: Thank you, I promise to be more diligent going forward. P.S. I have a poster in my room of the Lennon wall picture on your talk page! โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 19:06, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Is it the same photo? That's coolย :)โ Diannaa (talk) 19:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Mismatch Finder: We are making good progress on the tool. We made it possible to retrieve mismatches that are in the store part of the tool via an API.
Regular expressions in constraints are now no longer checked via the Query Service. The checks have been completely moved over to a dedicated service for regular expression checking. (phab:T204031)
Edits made via the user interface (as opposed to with tools, bots, etc.) are now tagged as such to make them easier to filter (example - edits made to labels, descriptions and aliases on mobile are still missing but will follow soon)
Working on allowing to restrict constraints to certain entity types (phab:T269724)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello,
You removed my summary of the film "Plan B" due to a lack of reliable sourcing. I was a bit confused as to what that meant, as I don't think I directly sourced any quotes or anything similar from the film in said summary. What should I change?
@Jarrjack: Sorry for the confusion. I took another look at your edit and it is too long and wordy. Per WP:FILMPLOT, summaries should only be 400-700 words. Try to condense it down if you can please. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 16:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cup bop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cup bop, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, FormalDude!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:08, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
@Theroadislong: Thanks for the quick review. Would you mind elaborating your view a little more? Do you think this article is not notable, or is it currently too promotional? I can see that it possibly has some unintended WP:PUFFERY, which I will clean up. Just so you know I am not affiliated with this subject in any way, other than being a person who has patronized it in the past. Appreciate any more feedback you can provide. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 08:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cup bop. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:17, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cup bop. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Re: User Sakura emad
Latest comment: 2 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion
Actually, I do assume good faith. I don't think she's malicious. It doesn't change the fact that she's making errors and creating avoidable problems. 136.49.32.166 (talk) 22:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Your responses make it seem like you are assuming bad faith. Just talk to them civilly the same way you're talking with me. No need for the all caps and excessive exclamations. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 22:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
No, I just detest people who keep mentioning "official Wikipedia policy" when they themselves don't follow them. 136.49.32.166 (talk) 22:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Well you'll need to hide your detestation of other editors on Wikipedia better in order to maintain civil discourse. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 22:37, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
One similar edit in common is not grounds for a SPI. You're pushing your luck and bordering on harassing this user with these accusations. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒtalk 20:48, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Milt's Stop & Eat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milt's Stop & Eat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The next Wikibase live session is at 16:00 UTC on Thursday 26th August 2021 (18:00 Berlin time). You're welcome to come and share your work around Wikibase.
BiCIKL Hackathon at the Meise Botanic Garden, September 20 - 24. Theme: adding articles/items about โHidden women in scienceโ on Wikipedia/Wikidata. If you're interested to participate, please write to maarten.trekelsplantentuinmeise.be
50 cool new things you can now do with KBโs collection highlights - In this series of 5 articles we show the added value of putting images and metadata of digitised collection highlights of the KB, national library of the Netherlands, into the Wikimedia infrastructure. By putting our collection highlights into Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia, dozens of new functionalities have been added. As a result of Wikifying this collection in 2020, you can now do things with these highlights that were not possible before. Article by OlafJanssen, DanielleJWiki and 1Veertje_(KB)
The "Wikidata Quickstatements" translator which lets users transfer metadata about citation sources fromZotero into Wikidata, no longer needs to be manually installed. Existing manually-installed versions should update automatically, like other translators.
Edits to labels, descriptions and aliases on mobile are now also tagged as edits made via the user interface. All edits made via the user interface are now tagged as such. (phab:T286775)
ArticlePlaceholder pages will now indicate that they are generated by the ArticlePlaceholder thanks to a patch by Luca (phab:T124191)
Working on making it possible to restrict constraints to certain entity types (phab:T269724)
Adding a new constraint type to ensure Items have a label in a certain language (phab:T195178)