Welcome!

edit

Hello, FabienR33, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:42, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fabien Remblier (May 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, FabienR33! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fabien Remblier (September 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fabien Remblier (January 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 03:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi
Thank you for the explanation.
I don't understand why you think the article does not have proper referencing.
Every important step of the article is sourced and linked to press articles.
Could you explain where on for which part you need more source exactly ?
Thanks FabienR33 (talk) 08:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fabien Remblier (April 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
GoingBatty (talk) 20:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

COI notice

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 17:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fabien Remblier (April 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 17:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi

All external news sources are about Remblier, not just passing mentions or press releases as you said. There are also direct mentions of edited books and awards. So I don't understand why the submission is declined.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fabien Remblier (June 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lewolka were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Lewolka (talk) 13:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi
All sources are reliable sources and talk specifically about the subject. There are no links to just "mentions".
All sources are independent and are from French press (such as Premiere Magazine (https://www.premiere.fr/), La Croix(https://www.la-croix.com/), Le Parisien (https://www.leparisien.fr/) which is one of the oldest journals in France, Mediakwest (https://mediakwest.com/) and many others...) so they are reliable. 37.171.231.142 (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Fabien Remblier

edit

  Hello, FabienR33. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fabien Remblier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply