FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8

FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

On the square

Thank you for the userboxes, I'll go add it to my collection. WegianWarrior (talk) 06:29, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ed Milliband. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Thryduulf (talk) 23:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ed Miliband, you may be blocked from editing. ekips39❦talk 23:37, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thryduulf (talk) 23:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Editor war. --Bamyers99 (talk) 15:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or sock puppetry.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 18:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 00:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

L-o-n-g ...... username

Hello 'FCKGW-...',
As you can see, I have shortened your username, hope you don't mind. In my opinion, it is just too long (29 non-word characters!), and how can we remember it? It looks like a Windows activation key or similar. (There may be longer, but easier to remember usernames ). If it were words i.e. "Randy from Boise", it would be much easier. I was usually called '220', when I was IP editing, and am either that or 'Borg' now. I would suggest changing it to something shorter and easier to remember, User:RHQQ2 has a 'ring' to it , and seems to be available! See Wikipedia:Changing username for more info. You can even Usurp a username in certain circumstances, if the one you want is already registered.

Note that how your 'sig' appears can be different from your exact username. (can be longer or shorter, different colours, fonts etc).
• Example, I am User:220 of Borg, but my sig is 220 of ^Borg. You customise it in your preferences at Special:Preferences. See also WP:CUSTOMSIG for more info.

I appreciated the 'thanks' for my edit too. 220 of ^Borg 01:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Cleveland Bay

Do you have a reliable source to back what u r saying? Coltsfan (talk) 01:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

I've looked at your editing history and there's a mixture of good edits and straight out vandalism. However this was beyond the pale. You may be unblocked if you can convince another administrator that you will not do anything like that ever again. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SciTECO

The article SciTECO has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG: BEFORE did not produce demonstrably independent and reliable sources offering significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^T 13:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)