Evileyes 247
Welcome
edit
 Getting Started Getting help
 The Commmunity |
 Policies and Guidelines
 Things to do | |
April 2009
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Verve Communications, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Articles on companies require notability and context. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
help desk reply
edit |
Hello Evileyes 247. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you! ZooFari 22:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC) |
| You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template. |
Speedy deletion of Verve communications
edit
A tag has been placed on Verve communications requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 14:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Verve communications. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Verve communications
edit I have nominated Verve communications, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verve communications. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Morbidthoughts (talk) 16:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Verve communications has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://vervecommunications.blogspot.com//). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
i did not know that. i have edited it now. --123.236.185.160 (talk) 06:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Evileyes 247 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
my computer is blocked from editing, i dont have that username that is shown for the block. can you please unblock this, thanks
Decline reason:
Clearing an autoblock
Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:
- If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache. - Try to edit the Sandbox.
- If you are still blocked, copy the {{unblock-ip|...}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section. This is usually hidden within the "What do I do now?" section. If so, just click the "[show]" link to the right hand side to show this text.
- Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.
If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. Sandstein 10:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Evileyes 247 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 125.17.114.226 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Esteemonline". The reason given for Esteemonline's block is: "{{spamusernameblock}}".
- Blocking administrator: Orangemike (talk • blocks)
Decline reason: Sorry, but I believe it is likely you are the same user who registered "Esteemonline" and edited inapproprpiately from that account. So this autoblock is serving its purpose, to enforce blocks. Please note that while I'm not going to block you at this time, your other account demonstrates a conflict of interest you have towards Esteem online, and if you do not abide by WP:BESTCOI in the future, you may find yourself blocked on this account too.
This autoblock should expire in about 24 hours; you can resume editing then. Mangojuicetalk 17:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
about the above unblock request
editAre you the same person who operated the prior, now blocked account? It appears that your editing and the editing of that other account are very similar. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 13:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
no, esteemonline is not my account, i dont even know whose it is. --Evileyes 247 14:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- I don't believe that. Your edits are too similar. Mangojuicetalk 17:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
what difference does it make if you believe it or not? am telling you thts not my ID. what else do u want me to prove?? --Evileyes 247 20:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)