Emrys02
Welcome!
edit
|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:04, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rolando Royal Edition icon.png
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Rolando Royal Edition icon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Emrys02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I never vandalized a wiki page??Emrys02 (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I agree that your edits are not vandalism. However you have repeatedly added personal opinion into articles. You need to understand that Wikipedia does not allow personal opinion to be inserted into articles. We base our information on verifiable information from reliable sources. I suggest you read these links and demonstrate an understanding of them in your next unblock request.HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 22:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Emrys02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Okay, I looked through my edit history and discovered that you are right, I had completely forgotten about those (very silly) edits in particular at the time. I understand what I did wrong and sincerely promise to not repeat my mistakes.Emrys02 (talk) 15:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please provide proof that Danny Devito played Mario in Birdemic. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Emrys02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ninja, there is no proof of this, I was just shitposting at the time. This was several years ago and I had actually forgotten all about it, prompting the rather adamant and premature response in my initial request. I will do better in future and promise to take steps to contribute to Wikipedia productively. For instance, the Rolando page needs cleaning up a bit, and the edits I made before on it were only reverted because my entire account was blocked, so it's understandable that some genuine attempts to change were caught in the crossfire. I would greatly appreciate a second chance and an opportunity to display this growth further.
Decline reason:
No answer on "Last Chance condition, with zero tolerance for "shit posting", vandalism, WP:OR, and probably any disruption at all. " -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:46, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- @Sergecross73: as blocking admin. I'm inclined to lend some WP:ROPE - the timespan is suitable and the editor is acceptably straightforward about their previous actions. Nosebagbear (talk) 01:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'm weary of the editor - virtually edit they made in 2019 were unconstructive, but if you wish to give them another shot, I won't stand in your way. Sergecross73 msg me 02:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- I understand that and hope I can earn your trust back in future. Emrys02 (talk) 15:32, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- No more "shit?" No more personal opinions? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- None whatsoever. Emrys02 (talk) 00:42, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Will ask blocking admin. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Leaning unblock. However, it would be a WP:LASTCHANCE with zero tolerance for "shit posting", vandalism, WP:OR, and probably any disruption at all. Think very carefully about whether you can edit under a "your next mistake will be your last" unblock condition right now. It would be very hard to return from a second indefinite block. You might want to withdraw this unblock request and try again later. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- As I mentioned before, I won't object if you or anyone else decides to unblock him, though I agree, this would probably be a last chance. Any more hoax nonsense and it's over. Sergecross73 msg me 16:34, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Leaning unblock. However, it would be a WP:LASTCHANCE with zero tolerance for "shit posting", vandalism, WP:OR, and probably any disruption at all. Think very carefully about whether you can edit under a "your next mistake will be your last" unblock condition right now. It would be very hard to return from a second indefinite block. You might want to withdraw this unblock request and try again later. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Will ask blocking admin. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- None whatsoever. Emrys02 (talk) 00:42, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- No more "shit?" No more personal opinions? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- I understand that and hope I can earn your trust back in future. Emrys02 (talk) 15:32, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'm weary of the editor - virtually edit they made in 2019 were unconstructive, but if you wish to give them another shot, I won't stand in your way. Sergecross73 msg me 02:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)