Your submission at Articles for creation: John Cooke (February 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamietw was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Jamietw (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Elemont.aide, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamietw (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Elemont.aide. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 20:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Cooke (February 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Onel5969 (talk) 15:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Okay

edit

I've polished up your article on John Cooke (Colorado politician), and approved it. You'll note that it's not quite like it was before; I've trimmed out a lot of extraneous content that wasn't about Mr Cooke himself. That said, it's a decent stub, and elected officials at that level are considered notable by default. DS (talk) 14:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply