Welcome!

edit

Hello, Eksusha, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Fancy Bear, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Widefox; talk 13:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Fancy Bear, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". and Ingenic Semiconductor Widefox; talk 13:07, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Eksusha! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:02, Wednesday, August 19, 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

One America News Network

edit

I've noticed that you've tried removing some sourced content from One America News Network. You're going about it wrong. You need to start a discussion at Talk:One America News Network, explain your reasoning for removing that content and its sources, and get consensus from other editors to make the change. Schazjmd (talk) 19:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I admire your attempts to add a balanced perspective to One America News Network. I tried that too some time ago, but it's owned by a few leftist, woke nutjobs who have formed an admin cabal to support one another and prevent any reasonable, balanced POV. I've had enough. I'm out. Wikipedia is eating its own, and its failure is only a matter of time. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 07:52, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Doug Weller. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to One America News Network seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 19:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jeppiz (talk) 20:10, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2020

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at XCore Architecture. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. drt1245 (talk) 15:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply