Information icon Hello, EditorSTW. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 01:04, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

October 2016

edit

Hello editorSTW, I see that you have been continuing to edit Draft:Save the Water despite your conflict of interest. I made some edits to it a few days ago removing all the trademark symbols and see that you have added them back in. I was trying to be helpful - if you read WP:TMRULES you will see that these are not acceptable on wikipedia, and your draft will not be accepted as an article with them in it, so I would suggest you remove them. They are also a giveaway that the article has been created by an edited with a conflict of interest and will likely make your article heavily scrutinised for any kind of promotional language, and unsourced content, so you might like to consider working on those as further well. Melcous (talk) 21:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Save the Water (November 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Naraht was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Naraht (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! EditorSTW, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Naraht (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Save the Water (May 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:59, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Save the Water (May 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seraphim System was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Seraphim System (talk) 10:52, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Save the Water concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Save the Water, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Save the Water

edit
 

Hello, EditorSTW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Save the Water".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:28, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply